Headhunter wrote:For those who are interested in not fake stats, Champ was targeted 86 times in 2006 and gave up 40 receptions. Five completions were over 25 yards, including receptions by Hines Ward, Arnaz Battle, Darrell Jackson, Derrick Mason and Samie Parker. Talk about a throwback with some of these names.
Still a great season, but that 4 reception stat is a joke.
No. That stat you just spewed is a joke, and I will expose it when you give me your answer in my question from the previous post.
Everyone reading this thread is now dumber. Thanks.
Your anger at your fake stat being exposed has made you pretty much incoherent in the last page.
It's not my stat. And it's laughable to think that some random goons in a basement pretending to tally statistics get your full support. Why are there 100s of different stat recording websites? They've all got different results. Why do you trust that one place over any other?
You're right, it's Mike Tirico's (I said Jaws, but I guess it was actually Tirico) stat. In 11 years, no other source has ever claimed it.
Who are these hundreds of stat recording websites with different results? Give me one other site that charts these like FO did for Champ's season. PFF data only goes back to 2007.
Headhunter wrote:For those who are interested in not fake stats, Champ was targeted 86 times in 2006 and gave up 40 receptions. Five completions were over 25 yards, including receptions by Hines Ward, Arnaz Battle, Darrell Jackson, Derrick Mason and Samie Parker. Talk about a throwback with some of these names.
Still a great season, but that 4 reception stat is a joke.
No. That stat you just spewed is a joke, and I will expose it when you give me your answer in my question from the previous post.
Everyone reading this thread is now dumber. Thanks.
Your anger at your fake stat being exposed has made you pretty much incoherent in the last page.
It's not my stat. And it's laughable to think that some random goons in a basement pretending to tally statistics get your full support. Why are there 100s of different stat recording websites? They've all got different results. Why do you trust that one place over any other?
You're right, it's Mike Tirico's (I said Jaws, but I guess it was actually Tirico) stat. In 11 years, no other source has ever claimed it.
Who are these hundreds of stat recording websites with different results? Give me one other site that charts these like FO did for Champ's season. PFF data only goes back to 2007.
They chart catches allowed by defining the receivers' primary defenders. Obviously there's no one size fits all with man-to-mans, zones, matchup zones, deep off-man etc. What exactly are you looking for?
So tell me how the fake stat you were caught peddling was "charted"?
You know, all you had to do was say "Oh okay, I heard the stat somewhere and thought it was true. I guess it isn't. He did have a great season though" but you're so hilariously stubborn that you'd rather just dig yourself into the deepest hole you possibly can and try to rant your way out of it. It's amazing to watch.
Also, why did you lie about it being a stat officially recorded by the Broncos? It was only cited one time, by Mike Tirico before a preseason football game. Nobody else has ever claimed it.
Jason wrote:I just went to that wesbite, and you literally have to buy in to see their stats.
Number one bull shit.
Oh hey, you found your slant! Now you can build the rest of your sinking ship argument off a point of contention you were desperate to find. You won't be able to defend your original fake stat of course, but it's better to shift the focus away from that.
Headhunter wrote:
Lmao. Just eyeballing here, almost none of these record the stats we're talking about. What did you search in Google?
"Google, please find some dumb ass NFL statistic websites similar to the ones Head likes to peddle as the end-all statistic website".
Why did you post a fake stat and get butthurt about being called out on it?
You can trust a random website that makes you give them money to see their phony stat recordings, I definitely favor a team's statistic over a non-credible football site. Nobody else knows the assignment for that player on every play other than the team that posts the stat.
But I will gladly watch 06 for myself and get back to you.
Headhunter wrote:
Lmao. Just eyeballing here, almost none of these record the stats we're talking about. What did you search in Google?
"Google, please find some dumb ass NFL statistic websites similar to the ones Head likes to peddle as the end-all statistic website".
Why did you post a fake stat and get butthurt about being called out on it?
You can trust a random website that makes you give them money to see their phony stat recordings, I definitely favor a team's statistic over a non-credible football site. Nobody else knows the assignment for that player on every play other than the team that posts the stat.
But I will gladly watch 06 for myself and get back to you.
Again, it's not a team statistic and they never posted it anywhere. You are lying about that and you've not even made an attempt to defend it.
Last edited by Headhunter on Sun Aug 26, 2018 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yes, an article written by the guy who charted every target and recorded it in Football Prospectus.
Your fake stat was a 10 second bit before a preseason football broadcast, never cited anywhere else at any other point in time other than mouth breathers like you on the internet who will believe anything.
By the way, when you hilariously trudge through every target vs. Champ on your white knight journey, be sure to note what kind of coverage shell is being played, man vs. zone etc. You demanded accountability from my sources, I demand accountability from you. Fair?
