Headhunter wrote:By the way, when you hilariously trudge through every target vs. Champ on your white knight journey, be sure to note what kind of coverage shell is being played, man vs. zone etc. You demanded accountability from my sources, I demand accountability from you. Fair?
Absolutely. I am not biased.
Also, I finally took to google and am encountering the forums you've been reading. It's like you copy & pasted some of the shit and posted them here. lol
Headhunter wrote:By the way, when you hilariously trudge through every target vs. Champ on your white knight journey, be sure to note what kind of coverage shell is being played, man vs. zone etc. You demanded accountability from my sources, I demand accountability from you. Fair?
Absolutely. I am not biased.
Also, I finally took to google and am encountering the forums you've been reading. It's like you copy & pasted some of the shit and posted them here. lol
Didn't read a single forum. I did cite the Schatz article. It's hilarious that you're digging through message boards on this white knight journey though. You go, girl!
But please continue to flail desperately like a pathetic child and tell lies. It's worked out so well for you so far.
In PFP 2007, you'll see Bailey listed with 86 passes. Some of those are double coverages, etc. He actually had 83 passes where he was listed in the DEFENDER1 column. Oddly, not one of those 83 passes had another defender listed in the DEFENDER2 column.
Why does it say 2007?
A little common sense here. They're published in the offseason. In the 2006 offseason, they couldn't very well publish a book worth of stats for a season that hasn't happened yet, could they?
In PFP 2007, you'll see Bailey listed with 86 passes. Some of those are double coverages, etc. He actually had 83 passes where he was listed in the DEFENDER1 column. Oddly, not one of those 83 passes had another defender listed in the DEFENDER2 column.
Why does it say 2007?
A little common sense here. They're published in the offseason. In the 2006 offseason, they couldn't very well publish a book worth of stats for a season that hasn't happened yet, could they?
Mmmkay. That's pretty retarded. But I'll just concede there.
In the same article they said Bailey gave up a bunch of yards and catches to the Steelers in week 8. We played the Colts in week 8...
In PFP 2007, you'll see Bailey listed with 86 passes. Some of those are double coverages, etc. He actually had 83 passes where he was listed in the DEFENDER1 column. Oddly, not one of those 83 passes had another defender listed in the DEFENDER2 column.
Why does it say 2007?
A little common sense here. They're published in the offseason. In the 2006 offseason, they couldn't very well publish a book worth of stats for a season that hasn't happened yet, could they?
Mmmkay. That's pretty retarded. But I'll just concede there.
In the same article they said Bailey gave up a bunch of yards and catches to the Steelers in week 8. We played the Colts in week 8...
How is it retarded? PFP is a preview of the upcoming season compiling stats from the previous season for reference, published during the summer.
And no it doesn't. It does say "The zero-yard Harrison catch was one of five from Week 8 where we have Bailey marked as the defender in coverage." That being Marvin Harrison. Of the Colts. That's the only place in the article where "Week 8" is mentioned.
If Bailey had that absurd a stat line, it would lead his every article and have been the headline of his HOF induction. Among the many places it would be mentioned.
showa58taro wrote:If Bailey had that absurd a stat line, it would lead his every article and have been the headline of his HOF induction. Among the many places it would be mentioned.
