Re: NFL 2018: From the Draft to the Super Bowl
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:58 pm
Come on. Please Oakland. Just one win. Is that too much to ask.
For Maniacs, By The Maniacs
http://horrormoviefans.com/forums/
And there ya go! Great game.showa58taro wrote:Come on. Please Oakland. Just one win. Is that too much to ask.
Lmao!Reign in Blood wrote:You beat the Browns. It's like the biggest virgin fucking a fat chick in the ass. Hoozah
After 3 winnable Gamess turned to losses mainly through second half ineptitude and a lack of pass rush, I’ll take anything I can.Reign in Blood wrote:You beat the Browns. It's like the biggest virgin fucking a fat chick in the ass. Hoozah
Getting rid of Mack was a bad move. If the Bengals got rid of Geno Atkins, you know I'd be blowing up the board and probably arrested for the things I would say!showa58taro wrote:After 3 winnable Gamess turned to losses mainly through second half ineptitude and a lack of pass rush, I’ll take anything I can.Reign in Blood wrote:You beat the Browns. It's like the biggest virgin fucking a fat chick in the ass. Hoozah
Raiders made contract mistakes before. I get ya. But take the Bengals for example......without Burfict (and they have so much talent) they are a bottom defense. With him.....no matter what year.....they are a defense to be reckoned with. Lights out kind of play. One player can make a huge difference. I probably would have agreed with ya a few years ago. But I've seen boneheaded Burfict take over games. Mack is that kind of player.Foo wrote:So how much would you have given Mack? From what I read he was holding out for a record contract. You gonna blow up the salary cap to give him whatever he wants?
It's not like they traded him just for the sake of having fun.
Not questioning his talent. Cap space is finite though. To give him more money means to give other positions less. At some point, you have to determine if he is worth cutting or not signing a couple other above average players and replacing them with average or below.Jmac Attack wrote:Raiders made contract mistakes before. I get ya. But take the Bengals for example......without Burfict (and they have so much talent) they are a bottom defense. With him.....no matter what year.....they are a defense to be reckoned with. Lights out kind of play. One player can make a huge difference. I probably would have agreed with ya a few years ago. But I've seen boneheaded Burfict take over games. Mack is that kind of player.Foo wrote:So how much would you have given Mack? From what I read he was holding out for a record contract. You gonna blow up the salary cap to give him whatever he wants?
It's not like they traded him just for the sake of having fun.
Or we take matters into our own hands.Headhunter wrote:Kamara and Gurley have scored a million touchdowns that has to slow down at some point.
Yes.Reign in Blood wrote:Or we take matters into our own hands.Headhunter wrote:Kamara and Gurley have scored a million touchdowns that has to slow down at some point.
Reign in Blood wrote:Or we take matters into our own hands.Headhunter wrote:Kamara and Gurley have scored a million touchdowns that has to slow down at some point.