Page 56 of 90

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:39 pm
by Reign in Blood
D, throwing down the cloud of Grinch on Halloween. I dig it.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:40 pm
by showa58taro
Jigsaw wrote:Hell House LLC was solid all-around.
LLC as in a corporation?

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:42 pm
by showa58taro
Reign in Blood wrote:D, throwing down the cloud of Grinch on Halloween. I dig it.
Did seem a bit grumpy. His heart needs to grow three sizes this day.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:43 pm
by Reign in Blood
showa58taro wrote:
Reign in Blood wrote:D, throwing down the cloud of Grinch on Halloween. I dig it.
Did seem a bit grumpy. His heart needs to grow three sizes this day.
At least 2 today. 3 by All Saints Day, that miserable fuck needs time.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:44 pm
by showa58taro
Reign in Blood wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Reign in Blood wrote:D, throwing down the cloud of Grinch on Halloween. I dig it.
Did seem a bit grumpy. His heart needs to grow three sizes this day.
At least 2 today. 3 by All Saints Day, that miserable fuck needs time.
True dat.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:45 pm
by Jigsaw
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Hell House LLC was solid all-around.
LLC as in a corporation?
I would indeed guess so, as it's the name of the company which, in the film, runs annual haunted houses during the Halloween season.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:47 pm
by showa58taro
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Hell House LLC was solid all-around.
LLC as in a corporation?
I would indeed guess so, as it's the name of the company which, in the film, runs annual haunted houses during the Halloween season.
What liability were they limiting? Haunted houses don’t strike me as financed by debt excessively.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:50 pm
by Jigsaw
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Hell House LLC was solid all-around.
LLC as in a corporation?
I would indeed guess so, as it's the name of the company which, in the film, runs annual haunted houses during the Halloween season.
What liability were they limiting? Haunted houses don’t strike me as financed by debt excessively.
Can't answer that, homeboy. Sorry. :P

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:51 pm
by showa58taro
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Hell House LLC was solid all-around.
LLC as in a corporation?
I would indeed guess so, as it's the name of the company which, in the film, runs annual haunted houses during the Halloween season.
What liability were they limiting? Haunted houses don’t strike me as financed by debt excessively.
Can't answer that, homeboy. Sorry. :P
Are you suggesting corporate organizational structure to minimize tax was not core to this horror film? Well that is sad.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:52 pm
by Jigsaw
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Hell House LLC was solid all-around.
LLC as in a corporation?
I would indeed guess so, as it's the name of the company which, in the film, runs annual haunted houses during the Halloween season.
What liability were they limiting? Haunted houses don’t strike me as financed by debt excessively.
Can't answer that, homeboy. Sorry. :P
Are you suggesting corporate organizational structure to minimize tax was not core to this horror film? Well that is sad.
I know, it lost a potential fan in you.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:53 pm
by showa58taro
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Hell House LLC was solid all-around.
LLC as in a corporation?
I would indeed guess so, as it's the name of the company which, in the film, runs annual haunted houses during the Halloween season.
What liability were they limiting? Haunted houses don’t strike me as financed by debt excessively.
Can't answer that, homeboy. Sorry. :P
Are you suggesting corporate organizational structure to minimize tax was not core to this horror film? Well that is sad.
I know, it lost a potential fan in you.
I should pioneer my brand of corporativist horror.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:54 pm
by Jigsaw
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Hell House LLC was solid all-around.
LLC as in a corporation?
I would indeed guess so, as it's the name of the company which, in the film, runs annual haunted houses during the Halloween season.
What liability were they limiting? Haunted houses don’t strike me as financed by debt excessively.
Can't answer that, homeboy. Sorry. :P
Are you suggesting corporate organizational structure to minimize tax was not core to this horror film? Well that is sad.
I know, it lost a potential fan in you.
I should pioneer my brand of corporativist horror.
I'd watch those - put them on NetFlix to further screw Jason over. :P

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:55 pm
by showa58taro
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Hell House LLC was solid all-around.
LLC as in a corporation?
I would indeed guess so, as it's the name of the company which, in the film, runs annual haunted houses during the Halloween season.
What liability were they limiting? Haunted houses don’t strike me as financed by debt excessively.
Can't answer that, homeboy. Sorry. :P
Are you suggesting corporate organizational structure to minimize tax was not core to this horror film? Well that is sad.
I know, it lost a potential fan in you.
I should pioneer my brand of corporativist horror.
I'd watch those - put them on NetFlix to further screw Jason over. :P
LMAO! I love it.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:57 pm
by flyingspider
DancesWithWerewolves wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
flyingspider wrote:To be quite honest, I might have watched some of these mid to late 70's movies on television, but that was 40 years ago, and who remembers that?? That is why they are bolded, I am counting them as a first watch.
Seems fair. :)

Wha? Not really. There have been SO many over the years that I haven't seen since I was a kid that I revisited but couldn't count because I had already seen it. No.
Obviously you remember what you watched...I on the other hand, do not.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 6:07 pm
by DancesWithWerewolves
showa58taro wrote:
Reign in Blood wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Reign in Blood wrote:D, throwing down the cloud of Grinch on Halloween. I dig it.
Did seem a bit grumpy. His heart needs to grow three sizes this day.
At least 2 today. 3 by All Saints Day, that miserable fuck needs time.
True dat.
Yeah, fucakall to rules, right? Whatevs.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 6:09 pm
by showa58taro
DancesWithWerewolves wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Reign in Blood wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Reign in Blood wrote:D, throwing down the cloud of Grinch on Halloween. I dig it.
Did seem a bit grumpy. His heart needs to grow three sizes this day.
At least 2 today. 3 by All Saints Day, that miserable fuck needs time.
True dat.
Yeah, fucakall to rules, right? Whatevs.
Rules are meant to be broken, baby.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 6:10 pm
by Jigsaw
DancesWithWerewolves wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Reign in Blood wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Reign in Blood wrote:D, throwing down the cloud of Grinch on Halloween. I dig it.
Did seem a bit grumpy. His heart needs to grow three sizes this day.
At least 2 today. 3 by All Saints Day, that miserable fuck needs time.
True dat.
Yeah, fucakall to rules, right? Whatevs.
It's not about rules, it's about logic.

If someone does not recall seeing a movie, even if it was vaguely possible that they have at some point, then to count it as a re-watch doesn't make sense. Unless you can recall seeing a movie/have other proof you've seen it, you can't in good conscious count it as a movie you've seen before.

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 6:11 pm
by Tiggnutz
Over the Line!!!

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 6:12 pm
by Tiggnutz
The Babysitter was great I enjoyed the shit outta that :D

Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 6:12 pm
by DancesWithWerewolves
Jigsaw wrote:
DancesWithWerewolves wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Reign in Blood wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Reign in Blood wrote:D, throwing down the cloud of Grinch on Halloween. I dig it.
Did seem a bit grumpy. His heart needs to grow three sizes this day.
At least 2 today. 3 by All Saints Day, that miserable fuck needs time.
True dat.
Yeah, fucakall to rules, right? Whatevs.
It's not about rules, it's about logic.

If someone does not recall seeing a movie, even if it was vaguely possible that they have at some point, then to count it as a re-watch doesn't make sense. Unless you can recall seeing a movie/have other proof you've seen it, you can't in good conscious count it as a movie you've seen before.
It does make sense if it rings a bell to count it as a rewatch. I've been disappointed by having to count past ones that way, but I did it.