HorrorMovieFans.com

And

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... mike-flynn

Jason wrote:Lol. CNN.

fuck that guy. and fuck those on the right that feel the same way when it's about left voters. because someone does not agree with you does not make them stupid.

This Russia stuff will last until 2018 if the Dems win back any of the houses and 2020 if they don't it is kinda sad

Tiggnutz wrote:This Russia stuff will last until 2018 if the Dems win back any of the houses and 2020 if they don't it is kinda sad

Have you looked at the seats up for grabs in the Senate? Basically, a massive win for Democrats would be not losing seats.

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:Lol. CNN.

fuck that guy. and fuck those on the right that feel the same way when it's about left voters. because someone does not agree with you does not make them stupid.

I believe he was talking about the CNN audience, as they are being fed the shit he admits peddling.

Foo wrote:

Tiggnutz wrote:This Russia stuff will last until 2018 if the Dems win back any of the houses and 2020 if they don't it is kinda sad

Have you looked at the seats up for grabs in the Senate? Basically, a massive win for Democrats would be not losing seats.

Thus their strategy

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:Lol. CNN.

fuck that guy. and fuck those on the right that feel the same way when it's about left voters. because someone does not agree with you does not make them stupid.

I believe he was talking about the CNN audience, as they are being fed the shit he admits peddling.

"would it be fair to question the intellect of the american voter?"

"oh no. they're stupid as shit." <-- that seems to be about voters, not cnn viewers?

his whole thing was about how trump is garbage. and he won the vote. i thought that's what this was about? if he's railing against trump. i don't know how you got from there, to him being critical of their audience?

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:Lol. CNN.

fuck that guy. and fuck those on the right that feel the same way when it's about left voters. because someone does not agree with you does not make them stupid.

I believe he was talking about the CNN audience, as they are being fed the shit he admits peddling.

"would it be fair to question the intellect of the american voter?"

"oh no. they're stupid as shit." <-- that seems to be about voters, not cnn viewers?

his whole thing was about how trump is garbage. and he won the vote. i thought that's what this was about? if he's railing against trump. i don't know how you got from there, to him being critical of their audience?

When they are producing Russia conspiracy fake news, it is targeting the people who watch their network. They know their own demographics and what they tune in and stay for.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:Lol. CNN.

fuck that guy. and fuck those on the right that feel the same way when it's about left voters. because someone does not agree with you does not make them stupid.

I believe he was talking about the CNN audience, as they are being fed the shit he admits peddling.

"would it be fair to question the intellect of the american voter?"

"oh no. they're stupid as shit." <-- that seems to be about voters, not cnn viewers?

his whole thing was about how trump is garbage. and he won the vote. i thought that's what this was about? if he's railing against trump. i don't know how you got from there, to him being critical of their audience?

When they are producing Russia conspiracy fake news, it is targeting the people who watch their network. They know their own demographics and what they tune in and stay for.

Didn't one of the Obamacare dick bags say roughly the same thing people are stupid.

Foo wrote:
When they are producing Russia conspiracy fake news, it is targeting the people who watch their network. They know their own demographics and what they tune in and stay for.

the guy doing the narration starts about "he doesn't have a high opinion of cnn's audience either", but then he's asked about voters, just after trashing trump and admitting that a lot of other people at cnn feel that way too. it feels odd to transition from that to suddenly being about the cnn audience.

did you watch this third video, specifically?

if it is meant to be about cnn's audience, then i'd like to hear the whole video, not just the little bit where he's clearly asked about american voters. not cnn watchers or audience or anything.

zombie wrote:if it is meant to be about cnn's audience, then i'd like to hear the whole video, not just the little bit where he's clearly asked about american voters. not cnn watchers or audience or anything.

Read between the lines, stop beating around the bush.

Reign in Blood wrote:

zombie wrote:if it is meant to be about cnn's audience, then i'd like to hear the whole video, not just the little bit where he's clearly asked about american voters. not cnn watchers or audience or anything.

Read between the lines, stop beating around the bush.

Reign in Blood wrote:

zombie wrote:if it is meant to be about cnn's audience, then i'd like to hear the whole video, not just the little bit where he's clearly asked about american voters. not cnn watchers or audience or anything.

Read between the lines, stop beating around the bush.

Everyone catches on eventually

Reign in Blood wrote:

zombie wrote:if it is meant to be about cnn's audience, then i'd like to hear the whole video, not just the little bit where he's clearly asked about american voters. not cnn watchers or audience or anything.

Read between the lines, stop beating around the bush.

Donald Jr: quite the dumb fuck! And I thought Eric was the slow one. Pretty clear Ivanka is the only Trump kid with any sense.

How can a person be this stupid

Trump Jr's e-mails about the Russian government offering dirt on Hillary were forwarded to Kushner and Manafort. Wonder who leaked them to the press.

Btw, yet another meeting/communication not disclosed on security clearance forms. :oops:

First: "Russia had no involvement in the election"
Then: "Russia was involved in the election, but we don't know that they were trying to influence it in Trump's favor"
Then: "They were trying to influence it in Trump's favor, but never met with the campaign to discuss influencing the election"
Now: "They did meet with the campaign to discuss influencing the election, but..."

Where do the goalposts move to now that we know members of the Trump campaign met who they assumed to be Russian government officials soliciting information to hurt a political opponent? Aka political contributions from a foreign government.

Stupid definitely applies. Send someone else to meet her dumbass

Donald Jr. being applauded for his transparency when The NY Times were going to publish the e-mails today and he knew it lmaooo

He did throw away his "fake news" card by posting it himself though.