HorrorMovieFans.com

Foo wrote:Zombie, do a meme where the NFL cocksuckers are on their knees and General Zod is on the Jumbotron. It will be glorious.

is it disrespectful, if i choose not to?

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:Zombie, do a meme where the NFL cocksuckers are on their knees and General Zod is on the Jumbotron. It will be glorious.

is it disrespectful, if i choose not to?

Nope. I feel good that you are asking these questions, though.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
Sure. You can find a doctor to say anything. How do you think all the opiod addicts are getting their prescriptions and all the medical marijuana users are getting their scripts? They love getting those checks from Medicaid.

Some.

Some.

then that is a problem that needs to be addressed, and possibly regulated, within the medical industry. doctors should not be incentivized. that should not be made a business, the same way as selling hotdogs or something.

then those some, in both cases, should not receive benefits.

Lol. You are gonna regulate? Out of curiosity, do you think all the people who receive medical marijuana are in medical need of it? Or do you think doctors are apt to prescribe it for other reasons?

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
Sure. You can find a doctor to say anything. How do you think all the opiod addicts are getting their prescriptions and all the medical marijuana users are getting their scripts? They love getting those checks from Medicaid.

Some.

Some.

then that is a problem that needs to be addressed, and possibly regulated, within the medical industry. doctors should not be incentivized. that should not be made a business, the same way as selling hotdogs or something.

then those some, in both cases, should not receive benefits.

Lol. You are gonna regulate? Out of curiosity, do you think all the people who receive medical marijuana are in medical need of it? Or do you think doctors are apt to prescribe it for other reasons?

no, it's not my place or profession to regulate. but how else would you keep the pharmaceutical industry from incentivizing doctors to prescribe as many pills and such as they can?

i think that some are in need of something, if not medical marijuana specifically. and i think that some doctors likely prescribe it for other reasons as well.

Z is right and Foo is wrong. Nuff said.

Good talk.

Reign in Blood wrote:Good talk.

Amen brotha.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
Sure. You can find a doctor to say anything. How do you think all the opiod addicts are getting their prescriptions and all the medical marijuana users are getting their scripts? They love getting those checks from Medicaid.

Some.

Some.

then that is a problem that needs to be addressed, and possibly regulated, within the medical industry. doctors should not be incentivized. that should not be made a business, the same way as selling hotdogs or something.

then those some, in both cases, should not receive benefits.

Lol. You are gonna regulate? Out of curiosity, do you think all the people who receive medical marijuana are in medical need of it? Or do you think doctors are apt to prescribe it for other reasons?

no, it's not my place or profession to regulate. but how else would you keep the pharmaceutical industry from incentivizing doctors to prescribe as many pills and such as they can?

i think that some are in need of something, if not medical marijuana specifically. and i think that some doctors likely prescribe it for other reasons as well.

The government pays a doctor far more to keep someone on disability than to return them to work. It is an unfortunate fact.

Foo wrote:
The government pays a doctor far more to keep someone on disability than to return them to work. It is an unfortunate fact.

if that is the case, then it is probably to make money off of that someone. doctors are incentivized by pharmaceutical companies and the like. government is probably also incentivized by those same companies.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
The government pays a doctor far more to keep someone on disability than to return them to work. It is an unfortunate fact.

if that is the case, then it is probably to make money off of that someone. doctors are incentivized by pharmaceutical companies and the like. government is probably also incentivized by those same companies.

Money talks. If you are a doctor, passing up a couple thousand a week in easy money is difficult. They schedule as many appointments as the government will pay for, and not one more. Keeping the people on disability keeps the gravy train rolling.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
The government pays a doctor far more to keep someone on disability than to return them to work. It is an unfortunate fact.

if that is the case, then it is probably to make money off of that someone. doctors are incentivized by pharmaceutical companies and the like. government is probably also incentivized by those same companies.

Money talks. If you are a doctor, passing up a couple thousand a week in easy money is difficult. They schedule as many appointments as the government will pay for, and not one more. Keeping the people on disability keeps the gravy train rolling.

money does talk. so it's okay that doctors are incentivized to push pills and lie to patients to keep them coming back.

Crazy liberals. The title says it all.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/whi ... df5e83afcd

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
The government pays a doctor far more to keep someone on disability than to return them to work. It is an unfortunate fact.

if that is the case, then it is probably to make money off of that someone. doctors are incentivized by pharmaceutical companies and the like. government is probably also incentivized by those same companies.

Money talks. If you are a doctor, passing up a couple thousand a week in easy money is difficult. They schedule as many appointments as the government will pay for, and not one more. Keeping the people on disability keeps the gravy train rolling.

money does talk. so it's okay that doctors are incentivized to push pills and lie to patients to keep them coming back.

I guess so. Nobody is upset about it.

Jason wrote:Crazy liberals. The title says it all.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/whi ... df5e83afcd

If you burned a flag in front of these liberals, they would get an erection so hard a cat couldn't scratch it. Sad.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
The government pays a doctor far more to keep someone on disability than to return them to work. It is an unfortunate fact.

if that is the case, then it is probably to make money off of that someone. doctors are incentivized by pharmaceutical companies and the like. government is probably also incentivized by those same companies.

Money talks. If you are a doctor, passing up a couple thousand a week in easy money is difficult. They schedule as many appointments as the government will pay for, and not one more. Keeping the people on disability keeps the gravy train rolling.

money does talk. so it's okay that doctors are incentivized to push pills and lie to patients to keep them coming back.

I guess so. Nobody is upset about it.

you blew off my concerns. i thought that's where you stood.

Jason wrote:Crazy liberals. The title says it all.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/whi ... df5e83afcd

telling people they shouldn't stand because it's supremacist in some way, is just as fucked as telling people they shouldn't kneel or sit because it's anti-american in some way.

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:Crazy liberals. The title says it all.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/whi ... df5e83afcd

telling people they shouldn't stand because it's supremacist in some way, is just as fucked as telling people they shouldn't kneel or sit because it's anti-american in some way.

That statement is as bad as the batshit crazy huffpost writer's article.

Kneeling is anti-American.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:Crazy liberals. The title says it all.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/whi ... df5e83afcd

telling people they shouldn't stand because it's supremacist in some way, is just as fucked as telling people they shouldn't kneel or sit because it's anti-american in some way.

That statement is as bad as the batshit crazy huffpost writer's article.

Kneeling is anti-American.

fuck off.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:Crazy liberals. The title says it all.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/whi ... df5e83afcd

telling people they shouldn't stand because it's supremacist in some way, is just as fucked as telling people they shouldn't kneel or sit because it's anti-american in some way.

That statement is as bad as the batshit crazy huffpost writer's article.

Kneeling is anti-American.

fuck off.

Now that you have found the edge of sanity, the walk back home to normalcy is relatively simple. :p

Foo wrote:
Now that you have found the edge of sanity, the walk back home to normalcy is relatively simple. :p

go ahead and pretend that i'm anti american and batshit crazy, because i don't agree with you. that's the conservative way.