For Maniacs, By The Maniacs
http://horrormoviefans.com/forums/
The point is to pander to black people. That is why he is selective with his outrage. Why else only highlight disproportionately large numbers when it fits the narrative?zombie wrote:no. the point is not to keep criminals from being convicted. at least that's how it looks to me.Foo wrote:
Do you think he believes it is unfair that men are disproportionately convicted of sexual assault?
Considering a big chunk of the liberal agenda centers on getting free shit, it is hard to believe that is not the goal. Again, look at healthcare. Actually raising the cost to give it to groups for free.showa58taro wrote:No, that’s not the point of liberalism.Foo wrote:I don't think it is stupid to want free shit. That is what modern liberalism is largely based upon. I have never called you stupid.
Why else would you make it a point to act like the number of blacks convicted of crimes is unjust? I want everyone treated the same under the law. However the numbers shake out, so be it. He feels differently.
And the point about crime isn’t the crimes themselves. It’s the situations that lead to crime and addressing them. Things like poverty, education, social equality, equality if opportunity. A black criminal shouldn’t be judged more leniently than a white criminal for the same crime. That would be stupid. Although I kotice the harsher average penalties for black criminals is also an actual issue.
do you think there is a case to make that women rape much more than is being reported or is being convicted, then? is there outrage to be had there?Foo wrote:The point is to pander to black people. That is why he is selective with his outrage. Why else only highlight disproportionately large numbers when it fits the narrative?zombie wrote:no. the point is not to keep criminals from being convicted. at least that's how it looks to me.Foo wrote:
Do you think he believes it is unfair that men are disproportionately convicted of sexual assault?
the single parent problem does need to be addressed, but even that has factors beyond the individuals that used to be a couple. it all should be worked on, absolutely.Foo wrote:Just like with black people. There are definitely problems in the black community, but they need to help themselves, not have some SJW fight for the system to change to accommodate bad behaviors.
Instead of whining about the system, how about addressing the single parent problem? A black couple getting married then getting pregnant is way too rare.
so, don't be an sjw for it. you're the one that brought it up here.Foo wrote:I think sexual assault as we are presently defining it is rampant by both men and women. Yet cases against women are rare by comparison.
Do I want to be a SJW for it? No, because it is making everyone look like pussies that they make a big ordeal over nonsense they could have easily handled at the time.
I have the Anti-SJW Equation.zombie wrote:so, don't be an sjw for it. you're the one that brought it up here.Foo wrote:I think sexual assault as we are presently defining it is rampant by both men and women. Yet cases against women are rare by comparison.
Do I want to be a SJW for it? No, because it is making everyone look like pussies that they make a big ordeal over nonsense they could have easily handled at the time.
Liberals are hell bent on destroying the family. How do I get that to stop? They have set the black community behind a generation.zombie wrote:the single parent problem does need to be addressed, but even that has factors beyond the individuals that used to be a couple. it all should be worked on, absolutely.Foo wrote:Just like with black people. There are definitely problems in the black community, but they need to help themselves, not have some SJW fight for the system to change to accommodate bad behaviors.
Instead of whining about the system, how about addressing the single parent problem? A black couple getting married then getting pregnant is way too rare.
you keep saying you're the anti something or have the anti something. but i've yet to see any indication of that, or to even understand what you even mean by that.Foo wrote:I have the Anti-SJW Equation.zombie wrote:so, don't be an sjw for it. you're the one that brought it up here.Foo wrote:I think sexual assault as we are presently defining it is rampant by both men and women. Yet cases against women are rare by comparison.
Do I want to be a SJW for it? No, because it is making everyone look like pussies that they make a big ordeal over nonsense they could have easily handled at the time.
how are liberals destroying the family? is there any culpability on conservatives at all?Foo wrote:Liberals are hell bent on destroying the family. How do I get that to stop? They have set the black community behind a generation.zombie wrote:the single parent problem does need to be addressed, but even that has factors beyond the individuals that used to be a couple. it all should be worked on, absolutely.Foo wrote:Just like with black people. There are definitely problems in the black community, but they need to help themselves, not have some SJW fight for the system to change to accommodate bad behaviors.
Instead of whining about the system, how about addressing the single parent problem? A black couple getting married then getting pregnant is way too rare.
That’s not liberalism. That’s your straw man of it.Foo wrote:Considering a big chunk of the liberal agenda centers on getting free shit, it is hard to believe that is not the goal. Again, look at healthcare. Actually raising the cost to give it to groups for free.showa58taro wrote:No, that’s not the point of liberalism.Foo wrote:I don't think it is stupid to want free shit. That is what modern liberalism is largely based upon. I have never called you stupid.
Why else would you make it a point to act like the number of blacks convicted of crimes is unjust? I want everyone treated the same under the law. However the numbers shake out, so be it. He feels differently.
And the point about crime isn’t the crimes themselves. It’s the situations that lead to crime and addressing them. Things like poverty, education, social equality, equality if opportunity. A black criminal shouldn’t be judged more leniently than a white criminal for the same crime. That would be stupid. Although I kotice the harsher average penalties for black criminals is also an actual issue.
I will share the equation, but use it responsibly!zombie wrote:you keep saying you're the anti something or have the anti something. but i've yet to see any indication of that, or to even understand what you even mean by that.Foo wrote:I have the Anti-SJW Equation.zombie wrote:so, don't be an sjw for it. you're the one that brought it up here.Foo wrote:I think sexual assault as we are presently defining it is rampant by both men and women. Yet cases against women are rare by comparison.
Do I want to be a SJW for it? No, because it is making everyone look like pussies that they make a big ordeal over nonsense they could have easily handled at the time.
Just because I work on the Anti-Zombie Equation does not mean I am anti-zombie. Batman works on contingencies to destroy other members of the Justice League all the time. Part of being my friend is knowing I am scheming your demise in case it becomes necessary. Is that weird?zombie wrote:as you've claimed in the past to be the anti-zombie, i'll take offense to that post.