zombie wrote:i hope that we can get to a place where there is inclusion and it doesn't have to be played up for marketing, or defended in the trades. i hope that it can just be, and let the films speak for themselves. we've had all male casts in films (or nearly all male, sometimes) why not have all women or all black or whatever too? the type of person you cast is not what makes a film good or bad. that comes in the acting and the direction. etc, not in the gender or the race of the actors involved.
We have all women/all black movies, too. Friday was awesome. All three of them. Bridesmaids was pretty damn funny.
agreed. we do. and we can have more and it shouldn't be a big deal.
So why does the media constantly want to talk about it? Tyler Perry made all black movies 50 fuckin' times and didn't announce to the world how inclusive in race he wanted to be. Just make movies with black people. You don't need to explain why whitey isn't involved. And don't slam whitey if he doesn't like it, BRIE...
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:34 pm
by Jason
zombie wrote:and captain marvel is a bad film because of how you view the actress to be, beyond the film? if that's cool, then it's cool for people to hate the mule because clint eastwood is a racist or whatever. anything else is a double standard. or you could just take the film on it's own merits. let the film speak for itself. (unless it means supporting a living criminal, cause i don't want you to throw that back at me. )
You gonna ask me this, knowing full well I've been shitting on Marvel for being boring for years, long before the political shit started becoming obvious? :p
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:35 pm
by zombie
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:the mule has a 70% on rt. and a 7.1/10 on imdb. looks to be faring pretty well.
It was at 8.3 when early reviews opened up and around 90-something on RT before Mule trolls dragged it down. I mentioned this double standard from RT regarding Captain Marvel to Headuardo, the other day.
Jason wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:the audience rating is 68%. is that worth manipulating to that level? or do you mean that they stopped allowing pre-opening comments for films? that's two different things.
It was as low as I believe 29% before it was temporarily removed from their site completely, then brought back with a higher score.
I'm sure that was a totally legit 29%.
Very likely not, but they went out of their way to hide the deleted reviews. Could've just said they removed trollee reviews and made a list of the ones they deleted. Pretty easy, and no controversy needed. The hypocrisy here is Rotten Tomatoes didn't remove any of those trollee comments for The Mule before it was ever released. Clint Eastwood has garnered a hateful cult following after supporting Romney in 2012 and saying millennials are fuckin' snowflakes. lol. It is hypocrisy, and a blatant double standard. But this goes on in the every day world of liberal manipulation in news media and Hollyweird.
i really don't want to rehash the whole captain marvel is being bought up argument again. forgive me.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:36 pm
by Jason
zombie wrote:i really don't want to rehash the whole captain marvel is being bought up argument again. forgive me.
Just highlighting mainstream leftist double standards as I always do.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:38 pm
by zombie
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:i hope that we can get to a place where there is inclusion and it doesn't have to be played up for marketing, or defended in the trades. i hope that it can just be, and let the films speak for themselves. we've had all male casts in films (or nearly all male, sometimes) why not have all women or all black or whatever too? the type of person you cast is not what makes a film good or bad. that comes in the acting and the direction. etc, not in the gender or the race of the actors involved.
We have all women/all black movies, too. Friday was awesome. All three of them. Bridesmaids was pretty damn funny.
agreed. we do. and we can have more and it shouldn't be a big deal.
So why does the media constantly want to talk about it? Tyler Perry made all black movies 50 fuckin' times and didn't announce to the world how inclusive in race he wanted to be. Just make movies with black people. You don't need to explain why whitey isn't involved. And don't slam whitey if he doesn't like it, BRIE...
why do they have to defend it too? why does casting an asian woman in star wars mean that she gets death threats? again, i hope that we can get to a point where casting a certain type of person (or type of people) doesn't become a huge deal.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:39 pm
by zombie
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:i really don't want to rehash the whole captain marvel is being bought up argument again. forgive me.
Just highlighting mainstream leftist double standards as I always do.
you definitely have a narrative that you like to push.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:41 pm
by Jason
zombie wrote:why do they have to defend it too? why does casting an asian woman in star wars mean that she gets death threats?
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:41 pm
by zombie
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:and captain marvel is a bad film because of how you view the actress to be, beyond the film? if that's cool, then it's cool for people to hate the mule because clint eastwood is a racist or whatever. anything else is a double standard. or you could just take the film on it's own merits. let the film speak for itself. (unless it means supporting a living criminal, cause i don't want you to throw that back at me. )
You gonna ask me this, knowing full well I've been shitting on Marvel for being boring for years, long before the political shit started becoming obvious? :p
well, then let's discuss the lack of quality in the film, rather than the actress' mouth or ass?
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:42 pm
by Jason
zombie wrote:
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:i really don't want to rehash the whole captain marvel is being bought up argument again. forgive me.
Just highlighting mainstream leftist double standards as I always do.
you definitely have a narrative that you like to push.
Publicly harassing those retards is a fun thing to do.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:42 pm
by zombie
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:why do they have to defend it too? why does casting an asian woman in star wars mean that she gets death threats?
i don't even know what this is?
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:44 pm
by Jason
zombie wrote:i don't even know what this is?
A quote from Ken Jeong in Hangover II that became a huge meme.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:44 pm
by zombie
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:i really don't want to rehash the whole captain marvel is being bought up argument again. forgive me.
Just highlighting mainstream leftist double standards as I always do.
you definitely have a narrative that you like to push.
Publicly harassing those retards is a fun thing to do.
you'll have to point me to the retards around here.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:46 pm
by Jason
zombie wrote:you'll have to point me to the retards around here.
Hopefully one of them will register here one day.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:46 pm
by zombie
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:i don't even know what this is?
A quote from Ken Jeong in Hangover II that became a huge meme.
oh okay. never saw it. and i guess missed the meme too.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:47 pm
by zombie
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:you'll have to point me to the retards around here.
Hopefully one of them will register here one day.
so not commenting or conversing to us, but to people that may come in the future. i guess that's one approach.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:56 pm
by DancesWithWerewolves
zombie wrote:
Jason wrote:
zombie wrote:i don't even know what this is?
A quote from Ken Jeong in Hangover II that became a huge meme.
oh okay. never saw it. and i guess missed the meme too.
You're not missing much. It's more of a retread of the first film than Escape from LA was to NY lol. I only loved the first Hangover.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 9:00 pm
by Jason
DancesWithWerewolves wrote:You're not missing much. It's more of a retread of the first film than Escape from LA was to NY lol. I only loved the first Hangover.
Same, but even that one wore off a tad with age.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 9:07 pm
by DancesWithWerewolves
Jason wrote:
DancesWithWerewolves wrote:You're not missing much. It's more of a retread of the first film than Escape from LA was to NY lol. I only loved the first Hangover.
Same, but even that one wore off a tad with age.
A tad, but I wonder if it wouldn't have it there were no sequels.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 9:31 pm
by Jason
Yeah. Sometimes less is more. Imagine Dumb & Dumber plopping out two sequels back-to-back in a span of 3 or 4 years.
Re: 03-27-2019
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 9:36 pm
by zombie
would have sucked cause we would not have gotten kingpin, if that had come to pass.