Page 11 of 21

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:34 pm
by Headhunter
I think the Chiefs are the team to beat in the division until the Raiders can field a defense that isn't terrible. But I think every team has enough upside to make the playoffs, best division in football by far.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:41 pm
by Headhunter
Also, Brock Osweiler got 37 million dollars in 18 months to be arguably the worst starting quarterback in football, now he's out of the league. What an inspiration.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:54 pm
by showa58taro
Headhunter wrote:Also, Brock Osweiler got 37 million dollars in 18 months to be arguably the worst starting quarterback in football, now he's out of the league. What an inspiration.
That is funny

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:07 pm
by Headhunter
showa58taro wrote:
Headhunter wrote:Also, Brock Osweiler got 37 million dollars in 18 months to be arguably the worst starting quarterback in football, now he's out of the league. What an inspiration.
That is funny
Got a ring and his pension too. All time great career.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:14 pm
by Reign in Blood
Headhunter wrote:Also, Brock Osweiler got 37 million dollars in 18 months to be arguably the worst starting quarterback in football, now he's out of the league. What an inspiration.
Wow. Hubris, baby. He would've been more protected with us because he knew our system/players and would have been a bit better and the future tag would have at least given him 2-3 years of trying. And hey, maybe he would've gotten better. But he damn sure would've stuck longer and made more money. Now he's cut by the worst laughing-stock in the league. How the worm turns. At least he doesn't have to work another day in his life if he doesn't want to.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:30 pm
by Headhunter
Reign in Blood wrote:
Headhunter wrote:Also, Brock Osweiler got 37 million dollars in 18 months to be arguably the worst starting quarterback in football, now he's out of the league. What an inspiration.
Wow. Hubris, baby. He would've been more protected with us because he knew our system/players and would have been a bit better and the future tag would have at least given him 2-3 years of trying. And hey, maybe he would've gotten better. But he damn sure would've stuck longer and made more money. Now he's cut by the worst laughing-stock in the league. How the worm turns. At least he doesn't have to work another day in his life if he doesn't want to.
The Texans saved our asses from what I remember. Elway was willing to pay him a pretty decent contract but the Texans' offer was just ridiculous. Having Brock locked down for two or more years to big money would have been a nightmare. Gotta think the money saved there helped re-sign Marshall and Darian Stewart later. And Siemian, for all his meh-ness, has proven to be a more cerebral QB than Brock ever will be in just two years.

What a highway robbery for playing like a season worth of games in his career. Shining example for Paxton to try to follow.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:09 am
by Headhunter
Since Lynch looks like a flame out I am moving on and hopping on the Kyle Sloter bandwagon. 2018-beyond starter for the Broncos.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:54 pm
by Headhunter
Cutting TJ Ward, a defensive leader, a week before the season...pretty puzzling. Should have let him play out his contract.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:01 pm
by Jason
Aguayo was cut again after he was picked up by the Bears. He only had one kick in preseason for them before he was let go. A 49-yarder. And he missed it.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:05 pm
by Headhunter
Shane Ray out until Week 8,TJ cut, Kyle GOATer put on waivers, Osweiler back.

One of the worst days in Broncos history.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:05 pm
by Jason
I'm trying to change the subject, you fuck.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:08 pm
by Jason
It's also being said that there is a good chance he'll be cut, anyway. Once Paxton's shoulder heals.

I honestly don't know who I'd rather have. Brock or Paxton.

Cinnamon is a God compared to those two.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:13 pm
by Headhunter
Yeah but they're tall

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:14 pm
by Reign in Blood
:| What, what, what? Why is Brock back? :|

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:22 pm
by Jason
Because Pax is hurt, and Chad Kelly is hurt. Realistically he'd be a viable backup under McCoy. And he's only getting 6 figures compared to 16 million. Browns still gotta pay him, though.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:23 pm
by Reign in Blood
Fuckin A, he's backup on the cheap.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:24 pm
by Jason
It's really not that bad at all. I'd just rather talk shit about him sucking elsewhere as a starter than have him back on the team rotting the bench again.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:26 pm
by Headhunter
It's pretty bad.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:27 pm
by Headhunter
Jason wrote:Because Pax is hurt, and Chad Kelly is hurt. Realistically he'd be a viable backup under McCoy. And he's only getting 6 figures compared to 16 million. Browns still gotta pay him, though.
Only viable if he never sees the field. Kubiak worked miracles just to get him to look decent and that offense suited Brock better.

Re: NFL Offseason, 2017

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:28 pm
by Reign in Blood
It's a team game, he did decent with us. Elway is like Pacino in Devil's Advocate right now. :twisted: Might still do decent, but we ain't paying you that huge contract!