HorrorMovieFans.com

Jason wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:So, someone from Fox News is being sued for helping spread the Fake News about Seth Rich, most recently in May. Anyone heard this yet? I an looking into it now.

Yes. This is merely to sway attention away from the fact that the DNC is being sued for rigging the election, the fact that two witnesses of Rich's murder mysteriously died, and the fact that the lawyer involved in these cases has received bizarre phone calls and death threats. One phone call of which was traced back to one of the offices of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. But Ill bet you knew none of that, as well. I'll wait for your denial.

I hate DW-S. You still believe in right wing conspiracy theories. That thread you made a while back with the "gotchas" was found to be false. Lol

By who? Snopes? I don't know if you even know what a conspiracy theory is.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:Cool facebook stats there, Headward.

Stats?

Facebook stats.

That graphic is taken from a Facebook post, yeah. I don't have a Facebook though. And I certainly wouldn't be that popular if you mean likes/shares/etc for stats.

That list of five accusations qualify as actual statistics on facebook. That is what a shit platform it is.

That's...not what a statistic is though.

It's a facebook statistic.

Again, what you're describing is not what statistics actually are...

Again, it's a statistic as far as facebook is concerned.

No, it's as far as you're concerned. Nobody else is calling it a statistic. Because it's literally not what a statistic is . . .

Jason wrote:Can one of you faggots upload an avatar for a change? Golly.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:So, someone from Fox News is being sued for helping spread the Fake News about Seth Rich, most recently in May. Anyone heard this yet? I an looking into it now.

Yes. This is merely to sway attention away from the fact that the DNC is being sued for rigging the election, the fact that two witnesses of Rich's murder mysteriously died, and the fact that the lawyer involved in these cases has received bizarre phone calls and death threats. One phone call of which was traced back to one of the offices of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. But Ill bet you knew none of that, as well. I'll wait for your denial.

I hate DW-S. You still believe in right wing conspiracy theories. That thread you made a while back with the "gotchas" was found to be false. Lol

By who? Snopes? I don't know if you even know what a conspiracy theory is.

I know you do though. That shit is small talk for you.

"That'll be seven dollars."
"Do you know what happened to Seth Rich?"

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:Cool facebook stats there, Headward.

Stats?

Facebook stats.

That graphic is taken from a Facebook post, yeah. I don't have a Facebook though. And I certainly wouldn't be that popular if you mean likes/shares/etc for stats.

That list of five accusations qualify as actual statistics on facebook. That is what a shit platform it is.

That's...not what a statistic is though.

It's a facebook statistic.

Again, what you're describing is not what statistics actually are...

Again, it's a statistic as far as facebook is concerned.

No, it's as far as you're concerned. Nobody else is calling it a statistic. Because it's literally not what a statistic is . . .

No. It's a stat, as far as facebook is concerned.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:Can one of you faggots upload an avatar for a change? Golly.

Why? You can pretty clearly tell us apart since you've yet to ask me why I'm not condemning Hillary Clinton in some random discussion that has nothing to do with her.

Headhunter wrote:Poor J-Mac. He can't post a single thing in this forum without Jason berating him for not condemning the entire Democratic Party in every post.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:Cool facebook stats there, Headward.

Stats?

Facebook stats.

That graphic is taken from a Facebook post, yeah. I don't have a Facebook though. And I certainly wouldn't be that popular if you mean likes/shares/etc for stats.

That list of five accusations qualify as actual statistics on facebook. That is what a shit platform it is.

That's...not what a statistic is though.

It's a facebook statistic.

Again, what you're describing is not what statistics actually are...

Again, it's a statistic as far as facebook is concerned.

No, it's as far as you're concerned. Nobody else is calling it a statistic. Because it's literally not what a statistic is . . .

No. It's a stat, as far as facebook is concerned.

Dude, you need to be referred to a dictionary so you can learn what a statistic is. Parroting this weird point over and over won't help you understand either.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:Can one of you faggots upload an avatar for a change? Golly.

Why? You can pretty clearly tell us apart since you've yet to ask me why I'm not condemning Hillary Clinton in some random discussion that has nothing to do with her.

Has Hillary Clinton been mentioned once in this thread? Who the fuck is Hillary Clinton?

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:Cool facebook stats there, Headward.

Stats?

Facebook stats.

That graphic is taken from a Facebook post, yeah. I don't have a Facebook though. And I certainly wouldn't be that popular if you mean likes/shares/etc for stats.

That list of five accusations qualify as actual statistics on facebook. That is what a shit platform it is.

That's...not what a statistic is though.

It's a facebook statistic.

Again, what you're describing is not what statistics actually are...

Again, it's a statistic as far as facebook is concerned.

No, it's as far as you're concerned. Nobody else is calling it a statistic. Because it's literally not what a statistic is . . .

No. It's a stat, as far as facebook is concerned.

Dude, you need to be referred to a dictionary so you can learn what a statistic is. Parroting this weird point over and over won't help you understand either.

I know what a statistic is. I'm not saying it is a statistic. I'm saying facebook concerned it to be a statistic. I.E.: Facebook statistic.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:Can one of you faggots upload an avatar for a change? Golly.

Why? You can pretty clearly tell us apart since you've yet to ask me why I'm not condemning Hillary Clinton in some random discussion that has nothing to do with her.

Has Hillary Clinton been mentioned once in this thread? Who the fuck is Hillary Clinton?

Now you're going to pretend you haven't been leading the "But Hillary..." charge on this forum for a long time? Nobody said anything about this thread.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:Can one of you faggots upload an avatar for a change? Golly.

Why? You can pretty clearly tell us apart since you've yet to ask me why I'm not condemning Hillary Clinton in some random discussion that has nothing to do with her.

Has Hillary Clinton been mentioned once in this thread? Who the fuck is Hillary Clinton?

Now you're going to pretend you haven't been leading the "But Hillary..." charge on this forum for a long time? Nobody said anything about this thread.

When did I ever bring up a "But hillary" scenario?

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:Can one of you faggots upload an avatar for a change? Golly.

Why? You can pretty clearly tell us apart since you've yet to ask me why I'm not condemning Hillary Clinton in some random discussion that has nothing to do with her.

Has Hillary Clinton been mentioned once in this thread? Who the fuck is Hillary Clinton?

Now you're going to pretend you haven't been leading the "But Hillary..." charge on this forum for a long time? Nobody said anything about this thread.

When did I ever bring up a "But hillary" scenario?

Now you're going to pretend you've never interacted with J-Mac in this subforum before? Mean.

Jason wrote:Can one of you faggots upload an avatar for a change? Golly.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:Can one of you faggots upload an avatar for a change? Golly.

I guess I need to get Photobucket or summat?

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:Can one of you faggots upload an avatar for a change? Golly.

Why? You can pretty clearly tell us apart since you've yet to ask me why I'm not condemning Hillary Clinton in some random discussion that has nothing to do with her.

Has Hillary Clinton been mentioned once in this thread? Who the fuck is Hillary Clinton?

Now you're going to pretend you haven't been leading the "But Hillary..." charge on this forum for a long time? Nobody said anything about this thread.

When did I ever bring up a "But hillary" scenario?

Now you're going to pretend you've never interacted with J-Mac in this subforum before? Mean.

I always rib him for claiming to be neutral but never shitting on Hillary. If that's what you mean. :p
It wasn't until I accused him of such that he finally started saying the DNC e-mails were legit bad. :p

Headhunter wrote:J-Mac, Reign, Zombie, whoever:

What's a "Facebook statistic" and why does the screenshot I posted qualify as one? I genuinely don't understand.

Headhunter wrote:J-Mac, Reign, Zombie, whoever:

What's a "Facebook statistic" and why does the screenshot I posted qualify as one? I genuinely don't understand.