For Maniacs, By The Maniacs
http://horrormoviefans.com/forums/
It finished strong enough to give it a C+ if only the beginning wasn't such a snoozer. Last 30 minutes were superbzombie wrote:watch absurd (1981). it's a sort of sequel. and it's much better of the two, in my opinion. available on youtube.Tiggnutz wrote:That scene just made this slow boring ass movie worth my timeTiggnutz wrote:Antropophagus
Agreed. Great film.zombie wrote:watch absurd (1981). it's a sort of sequel. and it's much better of the two, in my opinion. available on youtube.
just like we can both be wrong, we can be shameful too.Jigsaw wrote:Here's one of my biggest shames: I've never seen the original Salem's Lot.
Other than David Soul as Ben Mears, it holds up pretty well (I just don't like Soul, especially in that role). Proves Tobe Hooper was underrated as a director, its window scenes are far creepier than the similar scenes in the 2004 redo. Mind, I actually like the 2004 version too, and go back and forth as far as which I prefer. They both have their pluses and minuses. Rob Lowe > David SoulJigsaw wrote:Here's one of my biggest shames: I've never seen the original Salem's Lot.
I definitely liked Rob Lowe's performance in the 2004 version. I don't have anything against Soul, though (Starsky and Hutch was a fantastic show, in my opinion), so I'll be interested to see what I think of him there.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Other than David Soul as Ben Mears, it holds up pretty well (I just don't like Soul, especially in that role). Proves Tobe Hooper was underrated as a director, its window scenes are far creepier than the similar scenes in the 2004 redo. Mind, I actually like the 2004 version too, and go back and forth as far as which I prefer. They both have their pluses and minuses. Rob Lowe > David SoulJigsaw wrote:Here's one of my biggest shames: I've never seen the original Salem's Lot.
DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Return to Salem's Lot
Gonna try to actually finish it this time.
No where near as terrible as I heard, but not really good either. I much appreciate the actual practical FX work on the vamps (the one thing I really didn't like about the Fright Night remake was all the damn CGI), though when there was CGI it was pretty bad. I liked this Amy most out of all versions, and I kinda liked how it tried to deviate some with the story, but at the same time it could've just been it's own vampire story. This was the worst Peter Vincent; no charisma or presence.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Fright Night 2 (2013)
The part where Eddie walks into the church and says "GodDamn! It's hot in here!" actually made me laugh out loud when I watched it when it came out. I still giggle thinking about it. Now mind you, I havent watched it since 1995 when it came out. I rented it with my ex fiance. I just remember that part lol.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Vampire in Brooklyn
There's another one I've never seen. I plan on remedying that sometime this year.Tiggnutz wrote:Opera
Great film, great soundtrack. Probably my favorite Argento.Jigsaw wrote:There's another one I've never seen. I plan on remedying that sometime this year.
It's on TubiJigsaw wrote:There's another one I've never seen. I plan on remedying that sometime this year.Tiggnutz wrote:Opera
It does seem to get looked over but the kills are savage and it does have a killer soundtrackSlaughterhouserock wrote:Great film, great soundtrack. Probably my favorite Argento.Jigsaw wrote:There's another one I've never seen. I plan on remedying that sometime this year.
