HorrorMovieFans.com

Headhunter wrote:http://www.deseretnews.com/article/8656 ... ficer.html

Check this shit out.

looks like abuse of power, based on the article and video...

People excited about Gone With the Wind being taken out of theaters really scares me. What's next

taken out of theaters as in banned? i didn't realize it was even in theaters again...

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Now now Foo.....I remember conservatives making a stink about Michelle wearing a sleeveless dress and how conservative women were classier.......stupid people everywhere broski.

Congratulations for defending morons.

Wasn't defending morons. Lol. Was just giving you shit. Calm down snowflake.

Tiggnutz wrote:People excited about Gone With the Wind being taken out of theaters really scares me. What's next

Shit is getting ridiculous.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la ... story.html

Haha! Time for a good old fashioned liberal book burning of the novel too!

Foo wrote:http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la ... story.html

Haha! Time for a good old fashioned liberal book burning of the novel too!

yeah. it's not conservatives this time, so you can climb onto your high horse.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la ... story.html

Haha! Time for a good old fashioned liberal book burning of the novel too!

yeah. it's not conservatives this time, so you can climb onto your high horse.

I would never align myself with such people. Too much respect for free speech.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la ... story.html

Haha! Time for a good old fashioned liberal book burning of the novel too!

yeah. it's not conservatives this time, so you can climb onto your high horse.

I would never align myself with such people. Too much respect for free speech.

they do respect freedom of speech and expression, until it upsets or triggers them.

I had no idea so many people had such psychological problems to give two shits about a 70 year old movie. You can't even watch old TV shows in peace anymore with out someone crying about it.

Buy my new book! "George Jefferson made me seek refuge in my safe space in 2017!"

Foo wrote:I had no idea so many people had such psychological problems to give two shits about a 70 year old movie. You can't even watch old TV shows in peace anymore with out someone crying about it.

Buy my new book! "George Jefferson made me seek refuge in my safe space in 2017!"

yeah, such psychological problems. but you better stand for the anthem!

censorship and authoritarianism comes from conservatives and liberals alike.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:I had no idea so many people had such psychological problems to give two shits about a 70 year old movie. You can't even watch old TV shows in peace anymore with out someone crying about it.

Buy my new book! "George Jefferson made me seek refuge in my safe space in 2017!"

yeah, such psychological problems. but you better stand for the anthem!

censorship and authoritarianism comes from conservatives and liberals alike.

You should stand for the anthem. I am not going to stop you from sitting.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:I had no idea so many people had such psychological problems to give two shits about a 70 year old movie. You can't even watch old TV shows in peace anymore with out someone crying about it.

Buy my new book! "George Jefferson made me seek refuge in my safe space in 2017!"

yeah, such psychological problems. but you better stand for the anthem!

censorship and authoritarianism comes from conservatives and liberals alike.

You should stand for the anthem. I am not going to stop you from sitting.

i'm just shit if i do sit.

Foo wrote:http://www.standard.net/Courts/2016/05/ ... ommonplace

if she was interfering with what they had the right to do, why was she not charged at all?

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:http://www.standard.net/Courts/2016/05/ ... ommonplace

if she was interfering with what they had the right to do, why was she not charged at all?

Possibly because they recognized she was simply following what she was told.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:I had no idea so many people had such psychological problems to give two shits about a 70 year old movie. You can't even watch old TV shows in peace anymore with out someone crying about it.

Buy my new book! "George Jefferson made me seek refuge in my safe space in 2017!"

yeah, such psychological problems. but you better stand for the anthem!

censorship and authoritarianism comes from conservatives and liberals alike.

You should stand for the anthem. I am not going to stop you from sitting.

i'm just shit if i do sit.

Sure, but you are allowed to.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:http://www.standard.net/Courts/2016/05/ ... ommonplace

if she was interfering with what they had the right to do, why was she not charged at all?

Possibly because they recognized she was simply following what she was told.

you mean she was following the law? they knew at the scene that she was following what she was told. he even tried to snatch the phone away from her.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:I had no idea so many people had such psychological problems to give two shits about a 70 year old movie. You can't even watch old TV shows in peace anymore with out someone crying about it.

Buy my new book! "George Jefferson made me seek refuge in my safe space in 2017!"

yeah, such psychological problems. but you better stand for the anthem!

censorship and authoritarianism comes from conservatives and liberals alike.

You should stand for the anthem. I am not going to stop you from sitting.

i'm just shit if i do sit.

Sure, but you are allowed to.

good. the theater was allowed to play gone with the wind, but they were pressured into not playing it.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:http://www.standard.net/Courts/2016/05/ ... ommonplace

if she was interfering with what they had the right to do, why was she not charged at all?

Possibly because they recognized she was simply following what she was told.

you mean she was following the law? they knew at the scene that she was following what she was told. he even tried to snatch the phone away from her.

Hospital policy is not interchangeable with the law. I am not sure what the law is, but Utah is a unique place when you consider you have troopers taking blood from DUI suspects. The fact that the trooper was given a directive to arrest those obstructing leads me to believe there is some history at play.

You can be arrested and later they decide to not pursue charges for a variety of reasons.