HorrorMovieFans.com

2 almost TDs by JuJu.

FUCK. Whoever got his hand in and broke up that TD to JuJu needs to be punched in the arm.

Jason wrote:You lay down reactionary and double standard nonsense, then I call you out on it and you go "nah nah nah, I meant it THIS way. OMG I can't believe you don't understand how dense I am. I'm gonna troll you with it now!" and expect me to get all worked up about it. lol.

Again, you don't know what those things mean. You actually thought me sticking to my guns was an example of me being reactionary. Try not to confuse yourself so much.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:You lay down reactionary and double standard nonsense, then I call you out on it and you go "nah nah nah, I meant it THIS way. OMG I can't believe you don't understand how dense I am. I'm gonna troll you with it now!" and expect me to get all worked up about it. lol.

Again, you don't know what those things mean. You actually thought me sticking to my guns was an example of me being reactionary. Please don't confuse yourself with the notion that you understand these concepts.

"You don't understand my reactionary and double standard nonsense. boohoo. I troll u now."

Receiver quits on route, ball sails to the safety where the receiver would've been, you blame the QB. Troll me with that one now. lol

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:You lay down reactionary and double standard nonsense, then I call you out on it and you go "nah nah nah, I meant it THIS way. OMG I can't believe you don't understand how dense I am. I'm gonna troll you with it now!" and expect me to get all worked up about it. lol.

Again, you don't know what those things mean. You actually thought me sticking to my guns was an example of me being reactionary. Please don't confuse yourself with the notion that you understand these concepts.

"You don't understand me. boohoo. I troll u now."

Receiver quits on route, ball sails to the safety where the receiver would've been, you blame the QB. Troll me with that one now. lol

You not understanding me is a separate issue from you not understanding what "double standard" and "reactionary fan" mean. There are definitely a lot of things you don't understand, if that's what you're going for here.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:You lay down reactionary and double standard nonsense, then I call you out on it and you go "nah nah nah, I meant it THIS way. OMG I can't believe you don't understand how dense I am. I'm gonna troll you with it now!" and expect me to get all worked up about it. lol.

Again, you don't know what those things mean. You actually thought me sticking to my guns was an example of me being reactionary. Please don't confuse yourself with the notion that you understand these concepts.

"You don't understand me. boohoo. I troll u now."

Receiver quits on route, ball sails to the safety where the receiver would've been, you blame the QB. Troll me with that one now. lol

You not understanding me is a separate issue from you not understanding what "double standard" and "reactionary fan" mean. There are definitely a lot of things you don't understand, if that's what you're going for here.

Well, quit changing the way you go about being "reactionary" and laying out "double standards" and it wouldn't be an issue.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:You lay down reactionary and double standard nonsense, then I call you out on it and you go "nah nah nah, I meant it THIS way. OMG I can't believe you don't understand how dense I am. I'm gonna troll you with it now!" and expect me to get all worked up about it. lol.

Again, you don't know what those things mean. You actually thought me sticking to my guns was an example of me being reactionary. Please don't confuse yourself with the notion that you understand these concepts.

"You don't understand me. boohoo. I troll u now."

Receiver quits on route, ball sails to the safety where the receiver would've been, you blame the QB. Troll me with that one now. lol

You not understanding me is a separate issue from you not understanding what "double standard" and "reactionary fan" mean. There are definitely a lot of things you don't understand, if that's what you're going for here.

Well, quit changing the way you go about being "reactionary" and laying out "double standards" and it wouldn't be an issue.

It's not an issue. The issue is you not understanding those concepts and using them as the crux of your argument, along with lots of other failed things. I'm trying to help you be the best Jason possible, and you're just doubling down on your fuck ups here.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:You lay down reactionary and double standard nonsense, then I call you out on it and you go "nah nah nah, I meant it THIS way. OMG I can't believe you don't understand how dense I am. I'm gonna troll you with it now!" and expect me to get all worked up about it. lol.

Again, you don't know what those things mean. You actually thought me sticking to my guns was an example of me being reactionary. Please don't confuse yourself with the notion that you understand these concepts.

"You don't understand me. boohoo. I troll u now."

Receiver quits on route, ball sails to the safety where the receiver would've been, you blame the QB. Troll me with that one now. lol

You not understanding me is a separate issue from you not understanding what "double standard" and "reactionary fan" mean. There are definitely a lot of things you don't understand, if that's what you're going for here.

Well, quit changing the way you go about being "reactionary" and laying out "double standards" and it wouldn't be an issue.

It's not an issue. The issue is you not understanding those concepts and using them as the crux of your argument, along with lots of other failed things. I'm trying to help you be the best Jason possible, and you're just doubling down on your fuck ups here.

Quit changing your concepts and you wouldn't have to continue beating a god damn dead horse for all of eternity. "I meant it this way. You just don't understand me. I'm trying to help you be an even greater Jason".

The words of a charlatan.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:You lay down reactionary and double standard nonsense, then I call you out on it and you go "nah nah nah, I meant it THIS way. OMG I can't believe you don't understand how dense I am. I'm gonna troll you with it now!" and expect me to get all worked up about it. lol.

Again, you don't know what those things mean. You actually thought me sticking to my guns was an example of me being reactionary. Please don't confuse yourself with the notion that you understand these concepts.

"You don't understand me. boohoo. I troll u now."

Receiver quits on route, ball sails to the safety where the receiver would've been, you blame the QB. Troll me with that one now. lol

You not understanding me is a separate issue from you not understanding what "double standard" and "reactionary fan" mean. There are definitely a lot of things you don't understand, if that's what you're going for here.

Well, quit changing the way you go about being "reactionary" and laying out "double standards" and it wouldn't be an issue.

It's not an issue. The issue is you not understanding those concepts and using them as the crux of your argument, along with lots of other failed things. I'm trying to help you be the best Jason possible, and you're just doubling down on your fuck ups here.

Quit changing your concepts and you wouldn't have to continue beating a god damn dead horse for all of eternity. "I meant it this way. You just don't understand me. I'm trying to help you be an even greater Jason".

The words of a charlatan.

I meant them the way that they are. You don't understand them, and you don't get to treat your lack of understanding as an alternative definition. No participation trophies for trying.

Help me help you, Jason. I want you to know things.

Headhunter wrote: I meant them the way that they are. You don't understand them, and you don't get to treat your lack of understanding as an alternative definition. No participation trophies for trying.

Help me help you, Jason. I want you to know things.

I do know you're a spin doctor who changes his interpretation like Hillary does with the political winds, and you think beating a dead horse about it is going to get one over on me. Of all the conversations we've ever had. THIS bombshell is what you say you will troll me with forever. lol.

Why could that not have been D-Jax?!?! hmph

Overturned. Interesting.

Now bomb it to D-Jax, FFS Fitz.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote: I meant them the way that they are. You don't understand them, and you don't get to treat your lack of understanding as an alternative definition. No participation trophies for trying.

Help me help you, Jason. I want you to know things.

I do know you're a spin doctor who changes his interpretation like Hillary does with the political winds, and you think beating a dead horse about it is going to get one over on me. Of all the conversations we've ever had. THIS bombshell is what you say you will troll me with forever. lol.

You don't have to be so insecure, Jason. Nobody knows everything. You don't know what a double standards are or what constitutes reactionary behavior. It's going to be okay.

Your obnoxious ego makes it impossible not to troll you with it forever. You have this delusional, in-your-face confidence about everything that asks to be trolled at all times.

Damn it, Godwin. Stop being good.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote: I meant them the way that they are. You don't understand them, and you don't get to treat your lack of understanding as an alternative definition. No participation trophies for trying.

Help me help you, Jason. I want you to know things.

I do know you're a spin doctor who changes his interpretation like Hillary does with the political winds, and you think beating a dead horse about it is going to get one over on me. Of all the conversations we've ever had. THIS bombshell is what you say you will troll me with forever. lol.

You don't have to be so insecure, Jason. Nobody knows everything. You don't know what a double standards are or what constitutes reactionary behavior. It's going to be okay.

Your obnoxious ego makes it impossible not to troll you with it forever. You ask for it.

Insecure about what? You changing your interpretation to fit a narrative you're trying so desperately to troll me with? I give absolutely zero fudges, and clearly the only person trying to watch lè actual football game that is going on here. I wish you luck on your future endeavors, but this is the closest you will get to getting one over on me and you had to change your interpretation to do it. "It's going to be okay" (lol).

Inb4 "You don't know what 'interpretation' means!"

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote: I meant them the way that they are. You don't understand them, and you don't get to treat your lack of understanding as an alternative definition. No participation trophies for trying.

Help me help you, Jason. I want you to know things.

I do know you're a spin doctor who changes his interpretation like Hillary does with the political winds, and you think beating a dead horse about it is going to get one over on me. Of all the conversations we've ever had. THIS bombshell is what you say you will troll me with forever. lol.

You don't have to be so insecure, Jason. Nobody knows everything. You don't know what a double standards are or what constitutes reactionary behavior. It's going to be okay.

Your obnoxious ego makes it impossible not to troll you with it forever. You have this delusional, in-your-face confidence about everything that asks to be trolled at all times.

I see you edited in that last sentence (should've corrected the grammar in the first paragraph). That last sentence you edited in... is me being a troll. The fact that I have to explain that to you proves that you are as dense as I accused you of being earlier. I am a goof and a troll in the sports threads. BOMBSHELL. Nobody else in these threads ever discovered that until you did just now. I've been had. Congratulations, Headward. My 15 year run of being a troll in the sports thread of HMF without anybody noticing is now over. This is a revelation.

Joe Haden held D-Jax on a beautiful bomb by Fitzy that would've been a 50+ yard TD and many points for moi.

Dis hurtz

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote: I meant them the way that they are. You don't understand them, and you don't get to treat your lack of understanding as an alternative definition. No participation trophies for trying.

Help me help you, Jason. I want you to know things.

I do know you're a spin doctor who changes his interpretation like Hillary does with the political winds, and you think beating a dead horse about it is going to get one over on me. Of all the conversations we've ever had. THIS bombshell is what you say you will troll me with forever. lol.

You don't have to be so insecure, Jason. Nobody knows everything. You don't know what a double standards are or what constitutes reactionary behavior. It's going to be okay.

Your obnoxious ego makes it impossible not to troll you with it forever. You ask for it.

Insecure about what? You changing your interpretation to fit a narrative you're trying so desperately to troll me with? I give absolutely zero fudges, and clearly the only person trying to watch lè actual football game that is going on here. I wish you luck on your future endeavors, but this is the closest you will get to getting one over on me and you had to change your interpretation to do it. "It's going to be okay" (lol).

Insecure about not knowing things. I mean, it's plain to see you thought one concept (reactionary behavior) meant essentially the opposite of what it means. That's not an issue of interpretation, it's an issue of you simply not knowing what something means. That's a you problem, not a me problem. Take some responsibility for your shortcomings.

Jason wrote:Inb4 "You don't know what 'interpretation' means!"

Headhunter wrote:That's not an issue of interpretation.

...

Jason wrote:

Jason wrote:Inb4 "You don't know what 'interpretation' means!"

Headhunter wrote:That's not an issue of interpretation.

...

If you thought the sun was the moon, that would not be an issue of interpretation either. That's just you not knowing what things are.