Page 1 of 20

Game Of Thrones

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 10:34 pm
by Monster

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 10:41 pm
by Jason
Not touching that video yet.

Image




Im only a couple of episodes into season 1, but I had an irresistible urge to do a Bondathon, so I put this one aside before I got too deep into the show. I'll probably restart from the beginning, anyway. There's a lot to grasp in Game of Thrones right off the bat, and I'm entirely sure I've missed something. There are already about 80 characters in the show and I'm still not even sure who they are or who they're even affiliated with.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 10:54 pm
by Monster
I was 5 or 6 episodes in when I got hooked and could not stop watching. Went right out the next day and bought the other two seasons that were out on DVD.
There is a lot to get your head around character wise. I always do a marathon before each season premier just so I can remember who's who and what's what.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:15 am
by showa58taro
I got lucky. Wife had read the books and is good with names and faces etc so she could always say something like "that's Rob Stark, son of Ned, from Winterfell" and so I always had a virtual Wikipedia with me.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:49 am
by Tiggnutz
Only 2 more days until the epic return!

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:30 am
by Tiggnutz
Today is the day!!

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2017 8:12 am
by Monster
Finally! The long, long wait is over.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:34 pm
by showa58taro
Woot woot.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:04 am
by Tiggnutz
One of the better season openers imo

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:07 am
by Monster
That opening scene with Arya was beautiful.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 5:44 pm
by showa58taro
Was the typical set-up episode. Much needed but not fantastic to watch. Just gets you excited for what is to cone.

The Ed Sheeran bit I could very happily have done without though.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 8:02 pm
by Monster
I could've done without the bedpans.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:18 pm
by Headhunter
If not for the first Arya scene, could have done without that episode altogether.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:41 am
by showa58taro
Headhunter wrote:If not for the first Arya scene, could have done without that episode altogether.
I needed it to remember half of who we had and where they were. Felt like an extended recap in ways though. Not too much epicness. But I do agree it started excellent and just went downhill.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:25 pm
by Headhunter
Game of Thrones writers will be working on a new HBO show called Confederate about some Civil War alternate history.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:56 pm
by Monster
Sounds fascinating. And of course folks are already outraged about it.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:09 pm
by Headhunter
Monster wrote:Sounds fascinating. And of course folks are already outraged about it.
It is ridiculous. Bunch of losers with no creative bones in their body thinking they're entitled to tell talented artists what they can and can't create. You want your agenda and beliefs to mean anything in the realm of entertainment, write your own shit. Pretty simple to me.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:37 am
by showa58taro
Risky move though. Much like how Man in the High Castle and SS-GB didn't deal with the Final Solution aspect, you'd have to expect that show to gloss over the worst details of an alternative history. Also does seem an attempt at being trendy. Wouldn't catch my eye.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 4:00 am
by Headhunter
showa58taro wrote:Risky move though. Much like how Man in the High Castle and SS-GB didn't deal with the Final Solution aspect, you'd have to expect that show to gloss over the worst details of an alternative history. Also does seem an attempt at being trendy. Wouldn't catch my eye.
Trendy in what respect?

I understand why people would not want to see such a show for a variety of reasons and that's all respectable, I haven't heard a good argument yet for why it shouldn't be made which seems to be the consensus of the internet social media mob.

Re: Game Of Thrones

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:54 am
by showa58taro
Headhunter wrote:
showa58taro wrote:Risky move though. Much like how Man in the High Castle and SS-GB didn't deal with the Final Solution aspect, you'd have to expect that show to gloss over the worst details of an alternative history. Also does seem an attempt at being trendy. Wouldn't catch my eye.
Trendy in what respect?

I understand why people would not want to see such a show for a variety of reasons and that's all respectable, I haven't heard a good argument yet for why it shouldn't be made which seems to be the consensus of the internet social media mob.
It seems like alternate history shows are pretty common these days is all. So it's following MIHC and SSGB for example. And I'm sure there's a couple others like that.

It definitely should be made for the US audience. It'd be interesting. There's a high degree of risk.