HorrorMovieFans.com

We've all seen BLM go on countless worldwide rants about white people and how they oppress black people as though it were the 1850s. It's pretty irresponsible of them to turn the other cheek at the constant ruthlessness and black-on-black crime that occurs within their own community on a daily basis. The young black kids in this video were not charged with any crime, because they technically didn't commit one. However, if white kids were filming it, there is absolutely no denying that BLM would be all over this and those white kids would've been thrown in prison and charged with a hate crime.

BLM doesn't seem to realize that the biggest change, by far, needs to happen within their own community. Lashing out against white people will only further dampen whatever agenda it is they're trying to push. If "black lives matter", why isn't Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson calling for a change within their own racial community to stop behavior like this?

They will all most likely be locked up or dead in a few years.

I don't understand how you can just watch a thing like this happen, laugh about it, and still sleep at night. That's infuriating.

Just following the Seinfeld's gang irresponsible lead.

Hopefully their parents give them a whipping the likes they have never seen.

So this thread actually has nothing to do with BLM. Good to know.

Fun fact: "but wut about black-on-black crime" was the second question ever posed on the internet, after "did that kid stick his finger up the dog's ass?"

Headhunter wrote:So this thread actually has nothing to do with BLM. Good to know.

Because BLM wants nothing to do with it unless they can condemn white people.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:So this thread actually has nothing to do with BLM. Good to know.

Because BLM wants nothing to do with it unless they can condemn white people.

What a horseshit premise for a thread. Gross.

There's nothing in this thread that indicates you understand BLM or black issues in general, at all. One of the laziest threads I've ever seen.

Why don't you change the title, delete 90% of the first post and all the bizarre ideas and off target assumptions within it and just focus the thread on how we should be outraged about this happening in a vacuum instead of trying to connect it to Black Lives Matter? That's a clown move and holds absolutely no water. Glad nobody engaged in your trollbait garbage before I did, just focused on the asshole kids.

Headhunter wrote:Fun fact: "but wut about black-on-black crime" was the second question ever posed on the internet, after "did that kid stick his finger up the dog's ass?"

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:So this thread actually has nothing to do with BLM. Good to know.

Because BLM wants nothing to do with it unless they can condemn white people.

What a horseshit premise for a thread. Gross.

Why is your phony outrage always triggered when BLM is clowned on? They are all scum. Get over it.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:Fun fact: "but wut about black-on-black crime" was the second question ever posed on the internet, after "did that kid stick his finger up the dog's ass?"

The underlying idea behind "but wut about black on black crime"?: if members of your community commit crimes, nobody in the community is entitled to respectful treatment by law enforcement.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:So this thread actually has nothing to do with BLM. Good to know.

Because BLM wants nothing to do with it unless they can condemn white people.

What a horseshit premise for a thread. Gross.

Why is your phony outrage always triggered when BLM is clowned on? They are all scum. Get over it.

This was a really bad thread, Jason. All-time bad. And there are a lot of reasons to be critical of BLM, but you're really bad at it and miss the mark every time yourself. Do not blame me for your total aversion to understanding BLM.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:Fun fact: "but wut about black-on-black crime" was the second question ever posed on the internet, after "did that kid stick his finger up the dog's ass?"

The underlying idea behind "but wut about black on black crime"?: if members of your community commit crimes, nobody in the community is entitled to respectful treatment by law enforcement.

Obviously depends on the crime. And nobody mentioned the police.

Headhunter wrote:There's nothing in this thread that indicates you understand BLM or black issues in general, at all. One of the laziest threads I've ever seen.

Why don't you change the title, delete 90% of the first post and all the bizarre ideas and off target assumptions within it and just focus the thread on how we should be outraged about this happening in a vacuum instead of trying to connect it to Black Lives Matter? That's a clown move and holds absolutely no water. Glad nobody engaged in your trollbait garbage before I did, just focused on the asshole kids.

Read the thread title. This thread is about BLM and how they only come out publicly when it's at the opportunity to shit on white folk. If white kids did this, they would be called racist by you, BLM, and this video would get looped on CNN. Everyone would be calling for their heads and demanding life imprisonment. But because it occurred within the black community, they are just bad kids and should be ashamed.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:Fun fact: "but wut about black-on-black crime" was the second question ever posed on the internet, after "did that kid stick his finger up the dog's ass?"

The underlying idea behind "but wut about black on black crime"?: if members of your community commit crimes, nobody in the community is entitled to respectful treatment by law enforcement.

Obviously depends on the crime. And nobody mentioned the police.

Nobody mentioned the police? Oh, really? Because you made a video of a random, nonpolitical incident, all about Black Lives Matter. Please remind me through what issue did they gain prominence? It involved the police, right?

If you're going to drag a topic that has nothing to do with BLM in the gutter, don't half-ass it. You don't get to make it a BLM thread and say "Whatddya mean, police?"

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:Fun fact: "but wut about black-on-black crime" was the second question ever posed on the internet, after "did that kid stick his finger up the dog's ass?"

The underlying idea behind "but wut about black on black crime"?: if members of your community commit crimes, nobody in the community is entitled to respectful treatment by law enforcement.

I would think the underlying idea is why is black on black crime universally ignored? Has nothing to do with white people or police really. Black Lives Matter is a group of bigots with a catchy name nothing else.

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:So this thread actually has nothing to do with BLM. Good to know.

Because BLM wants nothing to do with it unless they can condemn white people.

What a horseshit premise for a thread. Gross.

Why is your phony outrage always triggered when BLM is clowned on? They are all scum. Get over it.

This was a really bad thread, Jason. All-time bad. And there are a lot of reasons to be critical of BLM, but you're really bad at it and miss the mark every time yourself. Do not blame me for your total aversion to understanding BLM.

BLM is easy to understand. Hate whitey. Love darky. It's always honky's fault.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:There's nothing in this thread that indicates you understand BLM or black issues in general, at all. One of the laziest threads I've ever seen.

Why don't you change the title, delete 90% of the first post and all the bizarre ideas and off target assumptions within it and just focus the thread on how we should be outraged about this happening in a vacuum instead of trying to connect it to Black Lives Matter? That's a clown move and holds absolutely no water. Glad nobody engaged in your trollbait garbage before I did, just focused on the asshole kids.

Read the thread title. This thread is about BLM and how they only come out publicly when it's at the opportunity to shit on white folk. If white kids did this, they would be called racist by you, BLM, and this video would get looped on CNN. Everyone would be calling for their heads and demanding life imprisonment. But because it occurred within the black community, they are just bad kids and should be ashamed.

The premise of this thread is dependent on your flimsy assumptions of what people you don't know are doing with their time as well as the popular American social theory that any groups with members predisposed to violence do not deserve equal protection from law enforcement and the justice system.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:So this thread actually has nothing to do with BLM. Good to know.

Because BLM wants nothing to do with it unless they can condemn white people.

What a horseshit premise for a thread. Gross.

Why is your phony outrage always triggered when BLM is clowned on? They are all scum. Get over it.

This was a really bad thread, Jason. All-time bad. And there are a lot of reasons to be critical of BLM, but you're really bad at it and miss the mark every time yourself. Do not blame me for your total aversion to understanding BLM.

BLM is easy to understand. Hate whitey. Love darky. It's always honky's fault.

It's bizarre how little you understand about race in America and how adamantly you dismiss it when you have the opportunity. You have no clue what you're talking about with these cases, ever.