CONFIRMED: Seth Rich was the DNC Leaker

[Jason]

We now know that Rich as behind the leak, through confirmation of wikileaks. Don't you think wikileaks would know who gave wikileaks the DNC documents in the first place? Why do you think they're tweeting this out?

Or are you talking about who is behind the murder itself?

why is wikileaks tweeting it out? i think that it doesn't mean anything to the public, really. what are you and i gonna do with that information? it is interesting to think about though.

Wikileaks is literally tweeting it out as their confirmation of Rich being behind the leaks. That is the entire reason they tweeted this out.

[zombie]

We now know that Rich as behind the leak, through confirmation of wikileaks. Don't you think wikileaks would know who gave wikileaks the DNC documents in the first place? Why do you think they're tweeting this out?

Or are you talking about who is behind the murder itself?

why is wikileaks tweeting it out? i think that it doesn't mean anything to the public, really. what are you and i gonna do with that information? it is interesting to think about though.

Wikileaks is literally tweeting it out as their confirmation of Rich being behind the leaks. That is the entire reason they tweeted this out.

cool. let's hope that something comes of it.

[Headhunter]

I'm not going to read that wall of text but I do know who Seymour Hersh is. So that was a waste of your time.

"I'm not gonna look at this 'evidence'. I'm not gonna read your 'post'. I know stuff about Hersh mang. u waste u time"

No. I just know who he is, so your further explanation was unnecessary and a waste of your time.

[Jason]

I'm not going to read that wall of text but I do know who Seymour Hersh is. So that was a waste of your time.

"I'm not gonna look at this 'evidence'. I'm not gonna read your 'post'. I know stuff about Hersh mang. u waste u time"

No. I just know who he is, so your further explanation was unnecessary and a waste of your time.

Hold that L.

[Headhunter]

I'm not going to read that wall of text but I do know who Seymour Hersh is. So that was a waste of your time.

"I'm not gonna look at this 'evidence'. I'm not gonna read your 'post'. I know stuff about Hersh mang. u waste u time"

No. I just know who he is, so your further explanation was unnecessary and a waste of your time.

Hold that L.

Write me a paragraph about who John Elway is next.

[Jason]

I'm not going to read that wall of text but I do know who Seymour Hersh is. So that was a waste of your time.

"I'm not gonna look at this 'evidence'. I'm not gonna read your 'post'. I know stuff about Hersh mang. u waste u time"

No. I just know who he is, so your further explanation was unnecessary and a waste of your time.

Hold that L.

Write me a paragraph about who John Elway is next.

Nah, you actually know who he is.

[Reign in Blood]

every previous post still has the old title.

Does it fuck...

That's lame. I guess it only renames new posts at the point of rename.

[zombie]

looks like jason changed it back too.

[Headhunter]

I'm not going to read that wall of text but I do know who Seymour Hersh is. So that was a waste of your time.

"I'm not gonna look at this 'evidence'. I'm not gonna read your 'post'. I know stuff about Hersh mang. u waste u time"

No. I just know who he is, so your further explanation was unnecessary and a waste of your time.

Hold that L.

Write me a paragraph about who John Elway is next.

Nah, you actually know who he is.

Don't be mad your thread was a massive failboat and that you weren't able to give me a history lesson. You'll get through it.

[Headhunter]

looks like jason changed it back too.

Great! So we're back to a clickbait fake news title. Jason is shameless.

[Jason]

every previous post still has the old title.

Does it fuck...

That's lame. I guess it only renames new posts at the point of rename.

Look at the subject line when you quote somebody.

[Jason]

I'm not going to read that wall of text but I do know who Seymour Hersh is. So that was a waste of your time.

"I'm not gonna look at this 'evidence'. I'm not gonna read your 'post'. I know stuff about Hersh mang. u waste u time"

No. I just know who he is, so your further explanation was unnecessary and a waste of your time.

Hold that L.

Write me a paragraph about who John Elway is next.

Nah, you actually know who he is.

Don't be mad your thread was a massive failboat and that you weren't able to give me a history lesson. You'll get through it.

Can't give a history lesson to those who aren't willing to learn. Also can't give a lesson on current events to those who aren't willing to accept it.

[Reign in Blood]

every previous post still has the old title.

Does it fuck...

That's lame. I guess it only renames new posts at the point of rename.

Look at the subject line when you quote somebody.

Love you too, bro. *insert kiss smiley*

[Headhunter]

What a thread.

[zombie]

GOAT conspiracy!

[Jason]

What a thread.

Great thread.

[Jason]

GOAT conspiracy!

That turns out to be true. Weird.

[Headhunter]

What a thread.

Great thread.

Stop being a fake news peddler and change the title of this thread. Looks bad for us all.

[Foo]

We now know that Rich as behind the leak, through confirmation of wikileaks. Don't you think wikileaks would know who gave wikileaks the DNC documents in the first place? Why do you think they're tweeting this out?

Or are you talking about who is behind the murder itself?

why is wikileaks tweeting it out? i think that it doesn't mean anything to the public, really. what are you and i gonna do with that information? it is interesting to think about though.

If it was confirmed Russia was the source, it would be a huge story, would it not? If true, this debunks the media and intelligence agency narrative of the past year.

would it be a huge story if russia turned out to be the leaker? would you not just say that this kind of thing happens all the time?

it hasn't been proven, so until then, it's fun to think about but not much more. if it is proven, then that is something big for sure. if there is evidence that proves it, that we're not getting. cool. let the investigation happen. let it lead to something real. otherwise, it's just "oswald didn't kill jfk!"

Has it not been a huge story with just rumor and innuendo that Russia was responsible?

[Jason]

What a thread.

Great thread.

Stop being a fake news peddler and change the title of this thread. Looks bad for us all.

Go watch CNN or educate yourself on Seymour Hersh or something.