Trump Assassination Attempt Discussion

[Jigsaw]

now zombie's gaslighting people brahs its getting dark out here

[zombie]

now zombie's gaslighting people brahs its getting dark out here

bad attempt at humor that didn't land, i guess.

[Jason]

It landed for me!

[Reign in Blood]

Nothing but gasoline and a broken light from zombs.

[zombie]

It landed for me!

i'm not doubting you. but i don't see the image.

[Reign in Blood]

Its just Kurt Cobain screaming non-sense.

[zombie]

kurt cobain? nah.... the joke was more fruity than kurt.

[Jason]

kurt cobain? nah.... the joke was more fruity than kurt.

It's a gif of Dolores saying "in your head"

[zombie]

kurt cobain? nah.... the joke was more fruity than kurt.

It's a gif of Dolores saying "in your head"

now reign gas lit me in return?

[Jason]

kurt cobain? nah.... the joke was more fruity than kurt.

It's a gif of Dolores saying "in your head"

now reign gas lit me in return?

The image I posted was a gif of Dolores

[zombie]

kurt cobain? nah.... the joke was more fruity than kurt.

It's a gif of Dolores saying "in your head"

now reign gas lit me in return?

The image I posted was a gif of Dolores

nicely done.

[Jason]

That was your joke right?

[zombie]

That was your joke right?

yeah. i just wanted to bring the song to mind while still fitting into the 5opic going on.

his mention of kurt takes it to a darker turn though.

[Jason]

That was your joke right?

yeah. i just wanted to bring the song to mind while still fitting into the 5opic going on.

his mention of kurt takes it to a darker turn though.

Something else went in his head.

[Headhunter]

He's a reformer, so in the simplest terms, limit big government and allow more freedom to citizens. Stop catering to illegal immigrants when we have our own citizens unable to get the things that illegals are able to get, stop sending money to foreign countries to prop up wars, become self sufficient in oil, etc...

That actually sounds pretty reasonable. Why does everyone here paint him as the devil, why?!

About ten years ago, the entire country was united in what they wanted in a candidate. No warmongers, someone who can't be bought by the establishment, a guy who will run against the corrupt elites in Washington. If you were to plug into a computer what the ideal candidate is that the public wanted, it would have shot out Donald Trump. The problem is that he ran with an R after his name. Everybody loved the guy. The people calling him Hitler, racist devil, holding up his severed head, and comparing his first election in 2016 to match the tragedy of 9-11 are the same people who loved him in the 80s and 90s. The billionaires he once got along so well with are funding corporate media to spout blatant lies and rhetoric in an attempt to smear him. People are waking up to it, though. But the smear campaign will never go away and he will always have the closed-minded detractors who will always find a reason not to like him no matter what happens. "But he fires people! Do we really want his finger on the nuclear button?!" Turned out he was the biggest proponent for peace in our entire lifetime.

I initially thought it was a joke when he ran, but when the media completely went ape shit on him in a way I had never seen them before, it made me really pay attention to him and come to the conclusion that he truly is fighting against the corruption. He's reforming the Republican party as we speak and maybe some time in the future the party as a whole can actually be respectable.

He seems like a good chap. Why does zombs despise reformers?

reform is like moving backwards. taking things away. like abortion was reformed. i only want to move forward.

This is the danger of media narrative. Abortion was not reformed. It was simply removed from federal mandate and down to individual states. So instead of the federal government deciding the law for you, each state will be allowed to make their own decision. They paint the narrative that it's taking away women's rights. Not only is it far more complicated than that, but they will never show you the statistics that women are close to 50-50 on it. It's far more complicated than "women's rights are taken away" or "you're killing a baby". Each side loves to play at the far end of the spectrum to create as much division as possible. The right decision is to put the decision in the hands of voters in each state, not federal government. From there, it's up to the general public to use their best judgment.

If I am a single man in a state where they'll allow abortion for any reason at any time, I have to use my best judgment on the type of woman I want to start a family with. Is she going to override my thoughts on the subject? If she is going to get an abortion without consulting with me, then she is not the right person for me. Thankfully I didn't marry a selfish crazy cat lady.

The women who don’t agree with abortions are certainly welcome to not get abortions.

That's kind of extreme and deflecting from the opposing viewpoint. That'd be like the opposite side saying women who've had abortions are murderers.

It’s extreme to say women who don’t want abortions don’t need to get abortions?

[Headhunter]

i guess he does have a lot of shit to be worried about. we can ignore one of the most significant of that shit.

He said it has nothing to do with what he believes. So what is there to worry about?

Trump is famously always honest.

[Headhunter]

That's kind of extreme and deflecting from the opposing viewpoint. That'd be like the opposite side saying women who've had abortions are murderers.

what is the justification for restricting abortion, if not because abortion is killing an unborn baby?

Some wackos think abortion should be allowed even right at birth.

No they don’t

[Headhunter]

My white male brother just got a great job at Disney

[Jason]

He's a reformer, so in the simplest terms, limit big government and allow more freedom to citizens. Stop catering to illegal immigrants when we have our own citizens unable to get the things that illegals are able to get, stop sending money to foreign countries to prop up wars, become self sufficient in oil, etc...

That actually sounds pretty reasonable. Why does everyone here paint him as the devil, why?!

About ten years ago, the entire country was united in what they wanted in a candidate. No warmongers, someone who can't be bought by the establishment, a guy who will run against the corrupt elites in Washington. If you were to plug into a computer what the ideal candidate is that the public wanted, it would have shot out Donald Trump. The problem is that he ran with an R after his name. Everybody loved the guy. The people calling him Hitler, racist devil, holding up his severed head, and comparing his first election in 2016 to match the tragedy of 9-11 are the same people who loved him in the 80s and 90s. The billionaires he once got along so well with are funding corporate media to spout blatant lies and rhetoric in an attempt to smear him. People are waking up to it, though. But the smear campaign will never go away and he will always have the closed-minded detractors who will always find a reason not to like him no matter what happens. "But he fires people! Do we really want his finger on the nuclear button?!" Turned out he was the biggest proponent for peace in our entire lifetime.

I initially thought it was a joke when he ran, but when the media completely went ape shit on him in a way I had never seen them before, it made me really pay attention to him and come to the conclusion that he truly is fighting against the corruption. He's reforming the Republican party as we speak and maybe some time in the future the party as a whole can actually be respectable.

He seems like a good chap. Why does zombs despise reformers?

reform is like moving backwards. taking things away. like abortion was reformed. i only want to move forward.

This is the danger of media narrative. Abortion was not reformed. It was simply removed from federal mandate and down to individual states. So instead of the federal government deciding the law for you, each state will be allowed to make their own decision. They paint the narrative that it's taking away women's rights. Not only is it far more complicated than that, but they will never show you the statistics that women are close to 50-50 on it. It's far more complicated than "women's rights are taken away" or "you're killing a baby". Each side loves to play at the far end of the spectrum to create as much division as possible. The right decision is to put the decision in the hands of voters in each state, not federal government. From there, it's up to the general public to use their best judgment.

If I am a single man in a state where they'll allow abortion for any reason at any time, I have to use my best judgment on the type of woman I want to start a family with. Is she going to override my thoughts on the subject? If she is going to get an abortion without consulting with me, then she is not the right person for me. Thankfully I didn't marry a selfish crazy cat lady.

The women who don’t agree with abortions are certainly welcome to not get abortions.

That's kind of extreme and deflecting from the opposing viewpoint. That'd be like the opposite side saying women who've had abortions are murderers.

It’s extreme to say women who don’t want abortions don’t need to get abortions?

It's extreme to jump to the assumption that I ever said anything close to that.

[Headhunter]

He's a reformer, so in the simplest terms, limit big government and allow more freedom to citizens. Stop catering to illegal immigrants when we have our own citizens unable to get the things that illegals are able to get, stop sending money to foreign countries to prop up wars, become self sufficient in oil, etc...

That actually sounds pretty reasonable. Why does everyone here paint him as the devil, why?!

About ten years ago, the entire country was united in what they wanted in a candidate. No warmongers, someone who can't be bought by the establishment, a guy who will run against the corrupt elites in Washington. If you were to plug into a computer what the ideal candidate is that the public wanted, it would have shot out Donald Trump. The problem is that he ran with an R after his name. Everybody loved the guy. The people calling him Hitler, racist devil, holding up his severed head, and comparing his first election in 2016 to match the tragedy of 9-11 are the same people who loved him in the 80s and 90s. The billionaires he once got along so well with are funding corporate media to spout blatant lies and rhetoric in an attempt to smear him. People are waking up to it, though. But the smear campaign will never go away and he will always have the closed-minded detractors who will always find a reason not to like him no matter what happens. "But he fires people! Do we really want his finger on the nuclear button?!" Turned out he was the biggest proponent for peace in our entire lifetime.

I initially thought it was a joke when he ran, but when the media completely went ape shit on him in a way I had never seen them before, it made me really pay attention to him and come to the conclusion that he truly is fighting against the corruption. He's reforming the Republican party as we speak and maybe some time in the future the party as a whole can actually be respectable.

He seems like a good chap. Why does zombs despise reformers?

reform is like moving backwards. taking things away. like abortion was reformed. i only want to move forward.

This is the danger of media narrative. Abortion was not reformed. It was simply removed from federal mandate and down to individual states. So instead of the federal government deciding the law for you, each state will be allowed to make their own decision. They paint the narrative that it's taking away women's rights. Not only is it far more complicated than that, but they will never show you the statistics that women are close to 50-50 on it. It's far more complicated than "women's rights are taken away" or "you're killing a baby". Each side loves to play at the far end of the spectrum to create as much division as possible. The right decision is to put the decision in the hands of voters in each state, not federal government. From there, it's up to the general public to use their best judgment.

If I am a single man in a state where they'll allow abortion for any reason at any time, I have to use my best judgment on the type of woman I want to start a family with. Is she going to override my thoughts on the subject? If she is going to get an abortion without consulting with me, then she is not the right person for me. Thankfully I didn't marry a selfish crazy cat lady.

The women who don’t agree with abortions are certainly welcome to not get abortions.

That's kind of extreme and deflecting from the opposing viewpoint. That'd be like the opposite side saying women who've had abortions are murderers.

It’s extreme to say women who don’t want abortions don’t need to get abortions?

It's extreme to jump to the assumption that I ever said anything close to that.

I’m responding to the idea that a lot of women are not pro-choice. That’s true. Luckily they are free to not get abortions when they get pregnant. In the end they win too.