seems he ran on a tough border policy? could his differences to harris have counted with the voters in his favor, possibly?

It is certainly possible that more people went to the polls on the presidential election day and voted for the Democrat senator than the presidential candidate. But highly suspect and unlikely.zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:08 am can it be possible that voters preferred ruben galiego's stated positions more than kamala harris'? does every election that doesn't go red have to be rigged now?
seems he ran on a tough border policy? could his differences to harris have counted with the voters in his favor, possibly?![]()
corrupt and evil cheaters does make for a better feel good story if anyone you prefer is beaten. that's true for democrat and republican alike. *shrug*Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 12:57 pmIt is certainly possible that more people went to the polls on the presidential election day and voted for the Democrat senator than the presidential candidate. But highly suspect and unlikely.zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:08 am can it be possible that voters preferred ruben galiego's stated positions more than kamala harris'? does every election that doesn't go red have to be rigged now?
seems he ran on a tough border policy? could his differences to harris have counted with the voters in his favor, possibly?![]()
Can it also be possible that election officials in Arizona are corrupt and rigged the senate seat for a cartel-linked scumbag? Yes, that is also possible and more likely given the circumstances surrounding Arizona.
The bread crumbs lead to corruption. Wisconsin and Michigan counted late, had massive ballot dumps for democrats and the blue senator in Wisconsin now has more votes than Kamala.zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 1:10 pmcorrupt and evil cheaters does make for a better feel good story if anyone you prefer is beaten. that's true for democrat and republican alike. *shrug*Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 12:57 pmIt is certainly possible that more people went to the polls on the presidential election day and voted for the Democrat senator than the presidential candidate. But highly suspect and unlikely.zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:08 am can it be possible that voters preferred ruben galiego's stated positions more than kamala harris'? does every election that doesn't go red have to be rigged now?
seems he ran on a tough border policy? could his differences to harris have counted with the voters in his favor, possibly?![]()
Can it also be possible that election officials in Arizona are corrupt and rigged the senate seat for a cartel-linked scumbag? Yes, that is also possible and more likely given the circumstances surrounding Arizona.
how popular was harris among democrat voters?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 4:28 pmThe bread crumbs lead to corruption. Wisconsin and Michigan counted late, had massive ballot dumps for democrats and the blue senator in Wisconsin now has more votes than Kamala.zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 1:10 pmcorrupt and evil cheaters does make for a better feel good story if anyone you prefer is beaten. that's true for democrat and republican alike. *shrug*Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 12:57 pmIt is certainly possible that more people went to the polls on the presidential election day and voted for the Democrat senator than the presidential candidate. But highly suspect and unlikely.zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:08 am can it be possible that voters preferred ruben galiego's stated positions more than kamala harris'? does every election that doesn't go red have to be rigged now?
seems he ran on a tough border policy? could his differences to harris have counted with the voters in his favor, possibly?![]()
Can it also be possible that election officials in Arizona are corrupt and rigged the senate seat for a cartel-linked scumbag? Yes, that is also possible and more likely given the circumstances surrounding Arizona.
I suspect unipartyists within the republican party helped. But, that is mostly speculation. Many Republicans within the senate are holding secret meetings to try to undermine Trump and that is not speculation. These would be the unipartyists, those who don't care if the president is red or blue as long as they are part of the establishment who will cling to lobbyists and special interest groups.
everyone is always undermining everyone else in washington. that's the nature of the game. there are factions of democrats undermining joe biden, undermining kamala harris. could be some helping trump but that's mostly speculation. some prominent liberal or not at all republican/conservative pundits have started doing things to favor trump along the way. that's not speculation.Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 5:00 pmI suspect unipartyists within the republican party helped. But, that is mostly speculation. Many Republicans within the senate are holding secret meetings to try to undermine Trump and that is not speculation. These would be the unipartyists, those who don't care if the president is red or blue as long as they are part of the establishment who will cling to lobbyists and special interest groups.
People within the democratic and republican party who band together and control the markets, prolong the wars and dictate the flow of money to better line their own personal pockets.
Many of those yellow blocks look very clickable!Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 5:21 pm When working the google on unipartyism this political chart came up. It says too many in the blue top right and you are a unipartying dickweed. Which squares do you hit?
![]()