
JFK Assassination Discussion
Forum rules
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11886
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
I did try to tell Jason how this would go down 

Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
Papa Jason gets ahead of himself in the JFK stuff.
And I initially interpreted the release of the Files to have a plan within 15 days to release files on said day.
And I initially interpreted the release of the Files to have a plan within 15 days to release files on said day.


- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11886
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
Don’t worry Jason they’re just going to need a few more delays for security reasons, they’ll get right on it
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
For now, the Billy Sol tapes confirming the Malcolm Wallace shit is bombshell enough to satisfy me until the files actually are released.


- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11886
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
Can’t call it anything until there is some independent authentication. Same with the Jean Lafitte datebooks and many other “bombshells” over the years. It’s all nothing until it’s not.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
I just verified it with my ears, GHeadhunter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 6:54 pmCan’t call it anything until there is some independent authentication. Same with the Jean Lafitte datebooks and many other “bombshells” over the years. It’s all nothing until it’s not.


- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11886
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
Even if we get past that part, you then have the issue of trusting in the credibility of a character like Billie Sol Estes.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
The stuff he presented to a grand jury in the early 80s is what put Malcolm Wallace on the map. His testimony overturned the Henry Marshall suicide into a homicide. Then the connection of his fingerprint inside the snipers nest that sat in the national archives for 35 years until the 1990s. He provided more than enough evidence to the jury to believe his case. The only uncertainty is how much higher does it go than the intelligence agencies and LBJ.Headhunter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 6:59 pm Even if we get past that part, you then have the issue of trusting in the credibility of a character like Billie Sol Estes.


- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11886
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
No, that’s not the only uncertainty. This isn’t by any means a sure thing.Jason wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:09 pmThe stuff he presented to a grand jury in the early 80s is what put Malcolm Wallace on the map. His testimony overturned the Henry Marshall suicide into a homicide. Then the connection of his fingerprint inside the snipers nest that sat in the national archives for 35 years until the 1990s. He provided more than enough evidence to the jury to believe his case. The only uncertainty is how much higher does it go than the intelligence agencies and LBJ.Headhunter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 6:59 pm Even if we get past that part, you then have the issue of trusting in the credibility of a character like Billie Sol Estes.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
I give it a 98.7% chance of being entirely legitimate. Those are pretty high odds.Headhunter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:11 pmNo, that’s not the only uncertainty. This isn’t by any means a sure thing.Jason wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:09 pmThe stuff he presented to a grand jury in the early 80s is what put Malcolm Wallace on the map. His testimony overturned the Henry Marshall suicide into a homicide. Then the connection of his fingerprint inside the snipers nest that sat in the national archives for 35 years until the 1990s. He provided more than enough evidence to the jury to believe his case. The only uncertainty is how much higher does it go than the intelligence agencies and LBJ.Headhunter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 6:59 pm Even if we get past that part, you then have the issue of trusting in the credibility of a character like Billie Sol Estes.
Imo


- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11886
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
lolJason wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:13 pmI give it a 98.7% chance of being entirely legitimate. Those are pretty high odds.Headhunter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:11 pmNo, that’s not the only uncertainty. This isn’t by any means a sure thing.Jason wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:09 pmThe stuff he presented to a grand jury in the early 80s is what put Malcolm Wallace on the map. His testimony overturned the Henry Marshall suicide into a homicide. Then the connection of his fingerprint inside the snipers nest that sat in the national archives for 35 years until the 1990s. He provided more than enough evidence to the jury to believe his case. The only uncertainty is how much higher does it go than the intelligence agencies and LBJ.Headhunter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 6:59 pm Even if we get past that part, you then have the issue of trusting in the credibility of a character like Billie Sol Estes.
Imo
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 10715
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
I was supposed to go today actually.Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:27 pm Headward, I think it would be a blast if we took Jason to Vegas.


Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
I've never been myselfReign in Blood wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:27 pm Headward, I think it would be a blast if we took Jason to Vegas.

- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 10715
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
You're invited. HMF convention 2025, man alive.Tiggnutz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:36 pmI've never been myselfReign in Blood wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:27 pm Headward, I think it would be a blast if we took Jason to Vegas.

Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
♫♫
Anna
All of my life
I've been searching
For a girl
To love me
Like I
Love yooooou
♫♫
Anna
All of my life
I've been searching
For a girl
To love me
Like I
Love yooooou
♫♫


Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
it sounds like a fluff job. but we'll see.
Re: JFK Assassination Discussion
Women can't keep secrets. She'll tell all!

My 22 year study of this may be coming to a definitive conclusion, at least somewhat, so I'm being as optimistic as possible and hoping we get something more than the magic bullet theory being debunked. Lol

