zombie wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 11:01 am
i thought everyone else was gonna be sensible and let me be the oddball. no luck there.
The Beatles are actually probably a top 20 band for me.
i don't know where they rank exactly for me, but that's without decade exclusion. and i'm weird.
What's decade exclusion?
even though we're doing a draft excluding the 90s here, i still take that decade into account when i rank bands.
I'm not going into this draft trying to make it look like a top rock bands list from Rolling Stone magazine. We all have our favorites that differ greatly and they're gonna be all over the place.
Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 11:34 am
Come on D, what a more beautiful way to use your override than sticking it to the Beatles! For old time's sake!
29 is not awful, to be fair. Rolling Stones magazine would put a hit out on me though I'm sure.
Tiggnutz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 10:57 am
Going to be a crazy draft
Indeed. You and Head clamored for only 30 and were like "you only get five picks. Better make em count".
So we get Free
Still don't get it. "Picking 30 is too hard and is hurting my head" they say... Now I know why! When you're scraping the heap searching for Free, my head hurts just thinking about it too.
Tiggnutz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 10:57 am
Going to be a crazy draft
Indeed. You and Head clamored for only 30 and were like "you only get five picks. Better make em count".
So we get Free
Still don't get it. "Picking 30 is too hard and is hurting my head" they say... Now I know why! When you're scraping the heap searching for Free, my head hurts just thinking about it too.
A forgivable typo. Head suggested top 30 but meant 300. I could go for that. I could have got Billy Squier in that top 300.
Tiggnutz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 8:27 am
We don't follow the proper rotation understandably but we actually should when it comes to vetoes and overrides.
There’s just no way to make it work in this format.
Makes more sense to haggle it out quietly. Maybe two players want to veto and they get into a Mexican standoff to see who blinks first.
That's the only one where I can see pulling rank/rotation. Most the time, let's just get the no veto out the way. But if there is a standoff, which we have had, that's where I can see "Nah, you gotta show your cards first, zombs" to see what happens. But we can't be following the rotation for every step unless we are all on.
Tiggnutz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 10:57 am
Going to be a crazy draft
Indeed. You and Head clamored for only 30 and were like "you only get five picks. Better make em count".
So we get Free
Still don't get it. "Picking 30 is too hard and is hurting my head" they say... Now I know why! When you're scraping the heap searching for Free, my head hurts just thinking about it too.
A forgivable typo. Head suggested top 30 but meant 300. I could go for that. I could have got Billy Squier in that top 300.
I'm fucking stroking it at #28 after Headward pulled that shit, you better believe.
Headhunter wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 11:43 am
I’m glad I played Free. Very underrated. My agenda is to keep some of the more laughably corny boomer bands off the list.
You need like 40 vetoes now that I'm a part of this.
Tiggnutz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 8:27 am
We don't follow the proper rotation understandably but we actually should when it comes to vetoes and overrides.
There’s just no way to make it work in this format.
Makes more sense to haggle it out quietly. Maybe two players want to veto and they get into a Mexican standoff to see who blinks first.
That's the only one where I can see pulling rank/rotation. Most the time, let's just get the no veto out the way. But if there is a standoff, which we have had, that's where I can see "Nah, you gotta show your cards first, zombs" to see what happens. But we can't be following the rotation for every step unless we are all on.
True. Some of you losers have jobs and can't be on all the time.
Tiggnutz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 10:57 am
Going to be a crazy draft
Indeed. You and Head clamored for only 30 and were like "you only get five picks. Better make em count".
So we get Free
Still don't get it. "Picking 30 is too hard and is hurting my head" they say... Now I know why! When you're scraping the heap searching for Free, my head hurts just thinking about it too.
A forgivable typo. Head suggested top 30 but meant 300. I could go for that. I could have got Billy Squier in that top 300.
I'm fucking stroking it at #28 after Headward pulled that shit, you better believe.
Tiggnutz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 8:27 am
We don't follow the proper rotation understandably but we actually should when it comes to vetoes and overrides.
There’s just no way to make it work in this format.
Makes more sense to haggle it out quietly. Maybe two players want to veto and they get into a Mexican standoff to see who blinks first.
That's the only one where I can see pulling rank/rotation. Most the time, let's just get the no veto out the way. But if there is a standoff, which we have had, that's where I can see "Nah, you gotta show your cards first, zombs" to see what happens. But we can't be following the rotation for every step unless we are all on.
i thought our little stand off before, added to the fun!
Tiggnutz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 12, 2025 8:27 am
We don't follow the proper rotation understandably but we actually should when it comes to vetoes and overrides.
There’s just no way to make it work in this format.
Makes more sense to haggle it out quietly. Maybe two players want to veto and they get into a Mexican standoff to see who blinks first.
That's the only one where I can see pulling rank/rotation. Most the time, let's just get the no veto out the way. But if there is a standoff, which we have had, that's where I can see "Nah, you gotta show your cards first, zombs" to see what happens. But we can't be following the rotation for every step unless we are all on.
i thought our little stand off before, added to the fun!