Great fun. Couple fun takes on tropes in horror that bucked the expectations. The knife was a particularly good one.Tiggnutz wrote:The Babysitter was great I enjoyed the shit outta that
The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8746
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
![Image](http://x2d.xanga.com/88cf434256631271215523/w216317840.jpg)
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
This movie feels more like a crime of lowlifes and its getting pieced together.
- Jigsaw
- Charter Member
- Posts: 3977
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
- Location: Columbia City, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
I think we're talking about different things.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:It does make sense if it rings a bell to count it as a rewatch. I've been disappointed by having to count past ones that way, but I did it.Jigsaw wrote:It's not about rules, it's about logic.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Yeah, fucakall to rules, right? Whatevs.showa58taro wrote:True dat.Reign in Blood wrote:At least 2 today. 3 by All Saints Day, that miserable fuck needs time.showa58taro wrote:Did seem a bit grumpy. His heart needs to grow three sizes this day.Reign in Blood wrote:D, throwing down the cloud of Grinch on Halloween. I dig it.
If someone does not recall seeing a movie, even if it was vaguely possible that they have at some point, then to count it as a re-watch doesn't make sense. Unless you can recall seeing a movie/have other proof you've seen it, you can't in good conscious count it as a movie you've seen before.
If a movie rings a bell, and a scene or two look familiar, then I agree, it's fair to count it as a re-watch.
If a movie is just something that you vaguely think it's possible you've seen (for instance, someone who watched a lot of television horror films in the 1970's may think they've seen Isn't It Shocking?, but haven't - they only say they've seen it because they've seen a lot of other horror flicks from the same era), then I don't think it's really fair to count it as a re-watch.
All of this is close to pointless, anyway. If Spider thinks she's seen the movie before, even if her recollection is deeply faded, I'm guessing they'd count it as a rewatch. If they literally can't remember a single scene while watching the film, then they should count it as a first-time viewing, even if it's possible they've seen it before.
Just my thoughts.
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
I'm dropping this movie. It doesn't look like it's going anywhere horror (I was expecting a killer rampage) but apparently it's just a crime thriller. Not even a horror tag on IMDB. A First lie from Shudder. Almost an hour wasted.
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
Doesn't matter, no one gives a shit anyway, so I'm done. I figured that the moment I spoke up, I'd stand alone as the bad guy on that.Jigsaw wrote:I think we're talking about different things.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:It does make sense if it rings a bell to count it as a rewatch. I've been disappointed by having to count past ones that way, but I did it.Jigsaw wrote:It's not about rules, it's about logic.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Yeah, fucakall to rules, right? Whatevs.showa58taro wrote:True dat.Reign in Blood wrote:At least 2 today. 3 by All Saints Day, that miserable fuck needs time.showa58taro wrote:Did seem a bit grumpy. His heart needs to grow three sizes this day.Reign in Blood wrote:D, throwing down the cloud of Grinch on Halloween. I dig it.
If someone does not recall seeing a movie, even if it was vaguely possible that they have at some point, then to count it as a re-watch doesn't make sense. Unless you can recall seeing a movie/have other proof you've seen it, you can't in good conscious count it as a movie you've seen before.
If a movie rings a bell, and a scene or two look familiar, then I agree, it's fair to count it as a re-watch.
If a movie is just something that you vaguely think it's possible you've seen (for instance, someone who watched a lot of television horror films in the 1970's may think they've seen Isn't It Shocking?, but haven't - they only say they've seen it because they've seen a lot of other horror flicks from the same era), then I don't think it's really fair to count it as a re-watch.
All of this is close to pointless, anyway. If Spider thinks she's seen the movie before, even if her recollection is deeply faded, I'm guessing they'd count it as a rewatch. If they literally can't remember a single scene while watching the film, then they should count it as a first-time viewing, even if it's possible they've seen it before.
Just my thoughts.
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
Road Games with Stacy Keach and Jamie Lee Curtis. Please don't disappoint.
- Jigsaw
- Charter Member
- Posts: 3977
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
- Location: Columbia City, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
What movie's that?DancesWithWerewolves wrote:I'm dropping this movie. It doesn't look like it's going anywhere horror (I was expecting a killer rampage) but apparently it's just a crime thriller. Not even a horror tag on IMDB. A First lie from Shudder. Almost an hour wasted.
Shudder is mostly horror, but I know they have a few random crime/sci-fi stuff on there I've been avoiding.
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
Let Me Make You A Martyr.Jigsaw wrote:What movie's that?DancesWithWerewolves wrote:I'm dropping this movie. It doesn't look like it's going anywhere horror (I was expecting a killer rampage) but apparently it's just a crime thriller. Not even a horror tag on IMDB. A First lie from Shudder. Almost an hour wasted.
Shudder is mostly horror, but I know they have a few random crime/sci-fi stuff on there I've been avoiding.
I even saw a Facebook ad promoting it as "Hey, Marylin Manson starred in a horror movie and it's on Shudder!". Not a post, an ad.
Ho hum.
Fair warning, don't watch
![Tongue :P](./images/smilies/icon_tongue.gif)
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8746
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
showa58taro wrote:But how was Brian Warner?
?
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8746
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
I'm pretty sure that is Marilyn Manson's real name? Maybe I'm confusing him with someone else.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:showa58taro wrote:But how was Brian Warner?
?
![Image](http://x2d.xanga.com/88cf434256631271215523/w216317840.jpg)
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
Oh. I don't remember his real name. He was fine I guess. His weight makes his turkeyneck look worseshowa58taro wrote:I'm pretty sure that is Marilyn Manson's real name? Maybe I'm confusing him with someone else.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:showa58taro wrote:But how was Brian Warner?
?
![Tongue :P](./images/smilies/icon_tongue.gif)
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
I'm really enjoying Stacy Keach bouncing between his small talk with his dingo (it's in Australia) as he drives the truck, and his paranoia with another person on the road he suspects might be a maniac.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8746
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
He’s fat now? Ha! I always assumed he stayed heroin thin.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Oh. I don't remember his real name. He was fine I guess. His weight makes his turkeyneck look worseshowa58taro wrote:I'm pretty sure that is Marilyn Manson's real name? Maybe I'm confusing him with someone else.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:showa58taro wrote:But how was Brian Warner?
?
![Image](http://x2d.xanga.com/88cf434256631271215523/w216317840.jpg)
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
Eh, a little bit. He's probably more about "average" but his small chin just doesn't hold it well.showa58taro wrote:He’s fat now? Ha! I always assumed he stayed heroin thin.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Oh. I don't remember his real name. He was fine I guess. His weight makes his turkeyneck look worseshowa58taro wrote:I'm pretty sure that is Marilyn Manson's real name? Maybe I'm confusing him with someone else.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:showa58taro wrote:But how was Brian Warner?
?
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
This is the same director as Psycho II. Interesting.
It's pretty drawn out, but it's had my attention. Really straddles that thriller/horror fence, but sure a fuck closer than the MM movie was.
It's pretty drawn out, but it's had my attention. Really straddles that thriller/horror fence, but sure a fuck closer than the MM movie was.
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
Didn't see Prom Night 3 anywhere, but since 2 was nothing like the first, I figure 4 will continue the trend of doing its own thing.
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
Seems to me she's saying she doesn't know if she's seen them because they were on TV 40 years ago and has no recollection of seeing them.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:showa58taro wrote:Seems fair.flyingspider wrote:To be quite honest, I might have watched some of these mid to late 70's movies on television, but that was 40 years ago, and who remembers that?? That is why they are bolded, I am counting them as a first watch.
Wha? Not really. There have been SO many over the years that I haven't seen since I was a kid that I revisited but couldn't count because I had already seen it. No.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/u58X9Ra.jpg)
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/FHITRiw.png)
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11069
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
I'm aware of how everyone else interpreted her statement. However, when I see the admission of "might have watched"...
![Image](http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/9b/9ba5a2c42d94a3a28766410aafbd72541fc6c1fa3f92f7ef745b3f7d8f47ab21.jpg)
But I get it, no one gives a shit, so I dropped it.
![Image](http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/9b/9ba5a2c42d94a3a28766410aafbd72541fc6c1fa3f92f7ef745b3f7d8f47ab21.jpg)
But I get it, no one gives a shit, so I dropped it.
Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
Considering their are three major types of companies and you just demonstrated zero knowledge of them, you might want to reconsider.showa58taro wrote:I should pioneer my brand of corporativist horror.Jigsaw wrote:I know, it lost a potential fan in you.showa58taro wrote:Are you suggesting corporate organizational structure to minimize tax was not core to this horror film? Well that is sad.Jigsaw wrote:Can't answer that, homeboy. Sorry.showa58taro wrote:What liability were they limiting? Haunted houses don’t strike me as financed by debt excessively.Jigsaw wrote:I would indeed guess so, as it's the name of the company which, in the film, runs annual haunted houses during the Halloween season.showa58taro wrote:LLC as in a corporation?Jigsaw wrote:Hell House LLC was solid all-around.