Again, they got the House. Mission accomplished. Your arbitrary number requirements are less than meaningless.Jason wrote:Foregone conclusion they'd get the House. 45-60 and gaining Senate is a wave. Neither happened.Headhunter wrote:Look at you clowns go.
They got the House. Mission accomplished.
About that "blue wave"...
Forum rules
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Anti-meaningless means it means something.Headhunter wrote:Again, they got the House. Mission accomplished. Your arbitrary number requirements are less than meaningless.Jason wrote:Foregone conclusion they'd get the House. 45-60 and gaining Senate is a wave. Neither happened.Headhunter wrote:Look at you clowns go.
They got the House. Mission accomplished.
Boom.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: About that "blue wave"...
"Less than" is not the same thing as anti . . .Jason wrote:Anti-meaningless means it means something.Headhunter wrote:Again, they got the House. Mission accomplished. Your arbitrary number requirements are less than meaningless.Jason wrote:Foregone conclusion they'd get the House. 45-60 and gaining Senate is a wave. Neither happened.Headhunter wrote:Look at you clowns go.
They got the House. Mission accomplished.
Boom.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Minus, bitch!
Double negative has led to proof positive, I'm afraid you gave yourself away.
Double negative has led to proof positive, I'm afraid you gave yourself away.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Jason, just shut the fuck up...Jason wrote:Minus, bitch!
Double negative has led to proof positive, I'm afraid you gave yourself away.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Orange County. That is all
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Poor Reign, his red island was rolled over by the blue wave. :cry:showa58taro wrote:Orange County. That is all
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Yup. The #Bluenami keeps on growing.Headhunter wrote:Poor Reign, his red island was rolled over by the blue wave. :cry:showa58taro wrote:Orange County. That is all
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Get a few more blue senators and a blue president and you guys can continue Obama's war mongering! Ya'll are trying your best with Russian and North Korea despite being out of power.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Think that is exactly the trajectory. Florida and Texas both swinging blue is not great for GOP
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Yeah when Texas goes blue I'm not sure how the GOP possibly counters, as many tricks as they usually have.
Don't count on Florida for anything, but without Texas they're fucked anyway.
Don't count on Florida for anything, but without Texas they're fucked anyway.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Neither of you have followed midterms. Lol
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Useless comment in response to nothing at all, huh?Jason wrote:Neither of you have followed midterms. Lol
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: About that "blue wave"...
The key in Florida is the likely 1.4M additional eligible minority voters.Headhunter wrote:Yeah when Texas goes blue I'm not sure how the GOP possibly counters, as many tricks as they usually have.
Don't count on Florida for anything, but without Texas they're fucked anyway.
Re: About that "blue wave"...
The parties constantly evolve to expand their base. Phony outrage dies down.Headhunter wrote:Yeah when Texas goes blue I'm not sure how the GOP possibly counters, as many tricks as they usually have.
Don't count on Florida for anything, but without Texas they're fucked anyway.
At some point, Dems have to get away from their super victim culture and get into policy.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: About that "blue wave"...
The Republicans will have to evolve to appeal to millennials.Foo wrote:The parties constantly evolve to expand their base. Phony outrage dies down.Headhunter wrote:Yeah when Texas goes blue I'm not sure how the GOP possibly counters, as many tricks as they usually have.
Don't count on Florida for anything, but without Texas they're fucked anyway.
At some point, Dems have to get away from their super victim culture and get into policy.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Good luck to the GOP trying to survive Trump.
Re: About that "blue wave"...
Let's say you are building a team. One team is a bunch of super victims who got to where they are by exploiting that status. The other is a team of achievers. You want to bet against the team of achievers over the long run?
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: About that "blue wave"...
You would have to achieve something to be the party of achievers.Foo wrote:Let's say you are building a team. One team is a bunch of super victims who got to where they are by exploiting that status. The other is a team of achievers. You want to bet against the team of achievers over the long run?
Re: About that "blue wave"...
You're running on baseless blue wave conjecture. You're giving me nothing worth actually discussing.Headhunter wrote:Useless comment in response to nothing at all, huh?Jason wrote:Neither of you have followed midterms. Lol