Trumpcare 2.1
Forum rules
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
I mean, you guys have $300 BILLION per year on prescriptions.
70% take 1 prescription drugs
50% take 2
4 Billion prescriptiosn were issued in one year.
That's a lot of money. That is definitely NOT what we see here.
70% take 1 prescription drugs
50% take 2
4 Billion prescriptiosn were issued in one year.
That's a lot of money. That is definitely NOT what we see here.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
For some perspective, only Americans seem to not find our endless commercials advertising prescription drugs strange.zombie wrote:is that something that is limited to america, really? i'm not trying to be dismissive. it feels like it's bigger than that though?showa58taro wrote:
- True, the US needs to get away from a pharma-culture. But there are still needs, medically, that are based on medication and drugs. A proper reassessment of mental health in the US would be welcome though.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
i don't think medicine should be treated like a business or product in the same way as t-shirts or soft drinks or whatever. that's what this is, seemingly.showa58taro wrote:I don't think they can do. I think there are some pretty good rules against these kind of payments. At the very least, it is not something that seems to affect the society, as I don't know that these things happen in any degree of regularity over here. it does happen though. I am sure about 2-3 years ago there was some kind of finding that doctors and nurses had links to pharmaceutical companies. Something like £200M or something like that, so not insignificant. But the system remains in place with restrictions on what you can be prescribed and how you are prescribed it. There is just no scope for people to just prescribe endless doses without it being absolutely necessary. That's what I've seen so far.zombie wrote:you don't have your drug companies pushing for antidepressants or anti-anxiety drugs onto everyone? so, it's just a symptom of our system in this country, then? or at least as far as you can tell. obviously you can't speak for everywhere.showa58taro wrote:I think it is much much worse in the US than in Sweden or the UK or Japan. That's all I can speak to really. Because you guys will get prescribed a lot more things (including things like Ritalin for ADHD, for example) than I'm aware here. Which makes sense, here it's all publically funded and you try not to give too much stuff. There, you paid top dollar for insurance, you want all the good stuff...zombie wrote:is that something that is limited to america, really? i'm not trying to be dismissive. it feels like it's bigger than that though?showa58taro wrote:
- True, the US needs to get away from a pharma-culture. But there are still needs, medically, that are based on medication and drugs. A proper reassessment of mental health in the US would be welcome though.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
The industry spent $4 Billion on direct marketing to consumers.showa58taro wrote:I mean, you guys have $300 BILLION per year on prescriptions.
70% take 1 prescription drugs
50% take 2
4 Billion prescriptiosn were issued in one year.
That's a lot of money. That is definitely NOT what we see here.
It spent $24 Billion on marketing to health-care providers. The sheer level of marketing in most of the pharmaceutical companies eclipses their R&D spend. They basically aren't researching new stuff that is good at the same page as trying to sell you shit, or sell your doctor shit to give to you because you trust them and assume they are doing it for the right reasons, rather than the bonus cheques they get from pharmaceutical companies.
I think that this issue, and the culture that pharmaceutical companies are pushing when it comes to their "sales team" or "reps" is the massive issue that is more worrisome for the US than anything I've seen elsewhere.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
Actually, that is true. I don't think in the UK you are allowed to have an advertisement that says "Ask your doctor" or whatever. Because... what the fuck? Have a problem, go see someone, and they get to decide what you need. You don't get to go there with a suggestion-list...Headhunter wrote:For some perspective, only Americans seem to not find our endless commercials advertising prescription drugs strange.zombie wrote:is that something that is limited to america, really? i'm not trying to be dismissive. it feels like it's bigger than that though?showa58taro wrote:
- True, the US needs to get away from a pharma-culture. But there are still needs, medically, that are based on medication and drugs. A proper reassessment of mental health in the US would be welcome though.
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
http://www.businessinsider.com/countrie ... ers-2016-2
US is tops, but the others are rapidly gaining.
It is absolutely ridiculous to think one in ten needs these pills. The only thing worse is calling them "treatment".
US is tops, but the others are rapidly gaining.
It is absolutely ridiculous to think one in ten needs these pills. The only thing worse is calling them "treatment".
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
It is exactly that, treated like a business and seeking in every case to increase profits and sales against its competitors.zombie wrote:i don't think medicine should be treated like a business or product in the same way as t-shirts or soft drinks or whatever. that's what this is, seemingly.showa58taro wrote:I don't think they can do. I think there are some pretty good rules against these kind of payments. At the very least, it is not something that seems to affect the society, as I don't know that these things happen in any degree of regularity over here. it does happen though. I am sure about 2-3 years ago there was some kind of finding that doctors and nurses had links to pharmaceutical companies. Something like £200M or something like that, so not insignificant. But the system remains in place with restrictions on what you can be prescribed and how you are prescribed it. There is just no scope for people to just prescribe endless doses without it being absolutely necessary. That's what I've seen so far.zombie wrote:you don't have your drug companies pushing for antidepressants or anti-anxiety drugs onto everyone? so, it's just a symptom of our system in this country, then? or at least as far as you can tell. obviously you can't speak for everywhere.showa58taro wrote:I think it is much much worse in the US than in Sweden or the UK or Japan. That's all I can speak to really. Because you guys will get prescribed a lot more things (including things like Ritalin for ADHD, for example) than I'm aware here. Which makes sense, here it's all publically funded and you try not to give too much stuff. There, you paid top dollar for insurance, you want all the good stuff...zombie wrote:is that something that is limited to america, really? i'm not trying to be dismissive. it feels like it's bigger than that though?showa58taro wrote:
- True, the US needs to get away from a pharma-culture. But there are still needs, medically, that are based on medication and drugs. A proper reassessment of mental health in the US would be welcome though.
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
that is a good point. that is so backwards. and so, if the doctor says you don't need it. then you go to find a doctor that will say yes, because the commercial said you may need it. they know better than the doctor, somehow. meh.showa58taro wrote:Actually, that is true. I don't think in the UK you are allowed to have an advertisement that says "Ask your doctor" or whatever. Because... what the fuck? Have a problem, go see someone, and they get to decide what you need. You don't get to go there with a suggestion-list...Headhunter wrote:For some perspective, only Americans seem to not find our endless commercials advertising prescription drugs strange.zombie wrote:is that something that is limited to america, really? i'm not trying to be dismissive. it feels like it's bigger than that though?showa58taro wrote:
- True, the US needs to get away from a pharma-culture. But there are still needs, medically, that are based on medication and drugs. A proper reassessment of mental health in the US would be welcome though.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
Presumably so. I mean, for reference, I am absolutely certain that we have Viagra or its equivalent in the UK, I don't see how we couldn't, but I have never once seen a single advert for it.zombie wrote:that is a good point. that is so backwards. and so, if the doctor says you don't need it. then you go to find a doctor that will say yes, because the commercial said you may need it. they know better than the doctor, somehow. meh.showa58taro wrote:Actually, that is true. I don't think in the UK you are allowed to have an advertisement that says "Ask your doctor" or whatever. Because... what the fuck? Have a problem, go see someone, and they get to decide what you need. You don't get to go there with a suggestion-list...Headhunter wrote:For some perspective, only Americans seem to not find our endless commercials advertising prescription drugs strange.zombie wrote:is that something that is limited to america, really? i'm not trying to be dismissive. it feels like it's bigger than that though?showa58taro wrote:
- True, the US needs to get away from a pharma-culture. But there are still needs, medically, that are based on medication and drugs. A proper reassessment of mental health in the US would be welcome though.
In the US when I've visited, I seem to see this kind of advert a few times per day.
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
Doctors, nurses, hospitals, pharma companies, here and in every part of the world are in business to make money. Why we act otherwise blows my mind.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
Maybe because hospitals are not in most of Europe? Because you can't make money when you are basically just on a budget and have to make it work.Foo wrote:Doctors, nurses, hospitals, pharma companies, here and in every part of the world are in business to make money. Why we act otherwise blows my mind.
Doctors and Nurses are expecting to be paid fairly. But often they also tend to have better motivations than just cash. Because there's a lot more to that job than the money.
Pharma companies are definitely in it for the money. but how much you let them influence things is a different story.
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
We also have many advertisements geared towards people getting on disability.
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
you can make money without being manipulative. manipulation should not be a part of medicine. it's not fast food. it's not movies. it's not t-shirts. it's medicine.Foo wrote:Doctors, nurses, hospitals, pharma companies, here and in every part of the world are in business to make money. Why we act otherwise blows my mind.
if this was about a surgical procedure, rather than a pill, would you still be advocating about it's a business. let it be a business?
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
You have advertisements for getting on Disability??? Seriously?Foo wrote:We also have many advertisements geared towards people getting on disability.
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
Everyone is in it for the money. Don't kid yourself.showa58taro wrote:Maybe because hospitals are not in most of Europe? Because you can't make money when you are basically just on a budget and have to make it work.Foo wrote:Doctors, nurses, hospitals, pharma companies, here and in every part of the world are in business to make money. Why we act otherwise blows my mind.
Doctors and Nurses are expecting to be paid fairly. But often they also tend to have better motivations than just cash. Because there's a lot more to that job than the money.
Pharma companies are definitely in it for the money. but how much you let them influence things is a different story.
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
http://blog.disabilitycanhappen.org/top ... isability/
"Mental Disorders: During a given year, about 26 percent of the adult population are diagnosed with one or more metal disorder. No wonder they account for nearly 10 percent of long-term disabilities."
Think about those numbers for a moment.
"Mental Disorders: During a given year, about 26 percent of the adult population are diagnosed with one or more metal disorder. No wonder they account for nearly 10 percent of long-term disabilities."
Think about those numbers for a moment.
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
Yup, all day long.showa58taro wrote:You have advertisements for getting on Disability??? Seriously?Foo wrote:We also have many advertisements geared towards people getting on disability.
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
in a lot of cases, they're diagnosed that way, to give them a pill or something. that's manipulation. but it's okay, cause it's a business and people want to make money?Foo wrote:http://blog.disabilitycanhappen.org/top ... isability/
"Mental Disorders: During a given year, about 26 percent of the adult population are diagnosed with one or more metal disorder. No wonder they account for nearly 10 percent of long-term disabilities."
Think about those numbers for a moment.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
Again, Hospitals in Europe can't be "in it for the money" as they are allocated a budget and have to make it work, and then measured against health metrics. They can't be "in it for the money" as they can't generate revenues.Foo wrote:Everyone is in it for the money. Don't kid yourself.showa58taro wrote:Maybe because hospitals are not in most of Europe? Because you can't make money when you are basically just on a budget and have to make it work.Foo wrote:Doctors, nurses, hospitals, pharma companies, here and in every part of the world are in business to make money. Why we act otherwise blows my mind.
Doctors and Nurses are expecting to be paid fairly. But often they also tend to have better motivations than just cash. Because there's a lot more to that job than the money.
Pharma companies are definitely in it for the money. but how much you let them influence things is a different story.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Trumpcare 2.1
Fuck me, that's depressing. And so wrong. Again, if you can't work, you should get disability. And you should apply for it. but you'd know if you weren't able to work, it isn't a grey zone. and it definitely shouldn't be easy to get on.Foo wrote:Yup, all day long.showa58taro wrote:You have advertisements for getting on Disability??? Seriously?Foo wrote:We also have many advertisements geared towards people getting on disability.