Page 6 of 18

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:31 pm
by Foo
Judge: "Your client is being charged with assault, armed robbery, and rape. Would you like to proceed with your opening statement?"

Zombie Cochran, Esq.: "He was just being a jerk, your Honor."

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:32 pm
by Foo
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:if there isn't a crime, why insist on what is and isn't a legal term?
Legal =/= Criminal
so, what was your point in insisting?
Because there were claims that Acosta's actions were not as they were being described. In fact, they were accurately described.
legally, he committed assault by refusing to give up the microphone. fair. just call it what it is and don't make it into something bigger for purposes of outrage.
Only liberals were outraged by the truth.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:32 pm
by zombie
Foo wrote:Judge: "Your client is being charged with assault, armed robbery, and rape. Would you like to proceed with your opening statement?"

Zombie Cochran, Esq.: "He was just being a jerk, your Honor."
*looks around* fuck me, i am in a court room. i thought this was an internet message board.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:33 pm
by zombie
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:if there isn't a crime, why insist on what is and isn't a legal term?
Legal =/= Criminal
so, what was your point in insisting?
Because there were claims that Acosta's actions were not as they were being described. In fact, they were accurately described.
legally, he committed assault by refusing to give up the microphone. fair. just call it what it is and don't make it into something bigger for purposes of outrage.
Only liberals were outraged by the truth.
nice tagline, dude.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:49 pm
by Foo
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:if there isn't a crime, why insist on what is and isn't a legal term?
Legal =/= Criminal
so, what was your point in insisting?
Because there were claims that Acosta's actions were not as they were being described. In fact, they were accurately described.
legally, he committed assault by refusing to give up the microphone. fair. just call it what it is and don't make it into something bigger for purposes of outrage.
Only liberals were outraged by the truth.
nice tagline, dude.
Hulk Hogan'd

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:50 pm
by zombie
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:if there isn't a crime, why insist on what is and isn't a legal term?
Legal =/= Criminal
so, what was your point in insisting?
Because there were claims that Acosta's actions were not as they were being described. In fact, they were accurately described.
legally, he committed assault by refusing to give up the microphone. fair. just call it what it is and don't make it into something bigger for purposes of outrage.
Only liberals were outraged by the truth.
nice tagline, dude.
Hulk Hogan'd
nah, that would be "brother", wouldn't it?

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:53 pm
by Foo
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:if there isn't a crime, why insist on what is and isn't a legal term?
Legal =/= Criminal
so, what was your point in insisting?
Because there were claims that Acosta's actions were not as they were being described. In fact, they were accurately described.
legally, he committed assault by refusing to give up the microphone. fair. just call it what it is and don't make it into something bigger for purposes of outrage.
Only liberals were outraged by the truth.
nice tagline, dude.
Hulk Hogan'd
nah, that would be "brother", wouldn't it?
He is probably 75% brother and 25% dude.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:00 pm
by Foo

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:03 pm
by zombie
Foo wrote:
that really runs up my back.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:06 pm
by Foo
zombie wrote:
that really runs up my back.
I feel like one could make a language of Hulk Hogan, Macho Man, and Warrior promos, and the world would be a better place. Maybe some Scott Steiner for some spice.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:08 pm
by zombie
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
that really runs up my back.
I feel like one could make a language of Hulk Hogan, Macho Man, and Warrior promos, and the world would be a better place. Maybe some Scott Steiner for some spice.
in that case, words aren't enough. it has to include gestures and mannerisms, or not at all.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:11 pm
by Foo
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
that really runs up my back.
I feel like one could make a language of Hulk Hogan, Macho Man, and Warrior promos, and the world would be a better place. Maybe some Scott Steiner for some spice.
in that case, words aren't enough. it has to include gestures and mannerisms, or not at all.
I don't know, I would have paid to see Stephen Hawking do them.

BTW, what was that like when Stephen Hawking met somebody else with the voice thingy? Would it be like hearing himself and get confusing?

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:15 pm
by zombie
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
that really runs up my back.
I feel like one could make a language of Hulk Hogan, Macho Man, and Warrior promos, and the world would be a better place. Maybe some Scott Steiner for some spice.
in that case, words aren't enough. it has to include gestures and mannerisms, or not at all.
I don't know, I would have paid to see Stephen Hawking do them.

BTW, what was that like when Stephen Hawking met somebody else with the voice thingy? Would it be like hearing himself and get confusing?
monotone computer voice would kind of kill the appeal of it, seemingly.

i can't think of another public figure who used it? i mean there are some fictional characters that kind of do. but that doesn't count.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:17 pm
by Foo
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
that really runs up my back.
I feel like one could make a language of Hulk Hogan, Macho Man, and Warrior promos, and the world would be a better place. Maybe some Scott Steiner for some spice.
in that case, words aren't enough. it has to include gestures and mannerisms, or not at all.
I don't know, I would have paid to see Stephen Hawking do them.

BTW, what was that like when Stephen Hawking met somebody else with the voice thingy? Would it be like hearing himself and get confusing?
monotone computer voice would kind of kill the appeal of it, seemingly.

i can't think of another public figure who used it? i mean there are some fictional characters that kind of do. but that doesn't count.
I would assume after many years, one would start to interpret that voice as his own.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:19 pm
by zombie
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
that really runs up my back.
I feel like one could make a language of Hulk Hogan, Macho Man, and Warrior promos, and the world would be a better place. Maybe some Scott Steiner for some spice.
in that case, words aren't enough. it has to include gestures and mannerisms, or not at all.
I don't know, I would have paid to see Stephen Hawking do them.

BTW, what was that like when Stephen Hawking met somebody else with the voice thingy? Would it be like hearing himself and get confusing?
monotone computer voice would kind of kill the appeal of it, seemingly.

i can't think of another public figure who used it? i mean there are some fictional characters that kind of do. but that doesn't count.
I would assume after many years, one would start to interpret that voice as his own.
that could be possible. but he seemed smarter than that. :P

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:20 pm
by Foo
Kane used the voice box thing for a little while before they let him talk. Did not sound like Hawking though. So Kane vs Hawking could have been a good one.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:04 am
by showa58taro
Lol.

Foo should change his user name to Fox as there isn’t a conservative talking point he won’t champion.

Can I also highlight that barring members of the press who disagree with you and limiting their access is the bread and butter if dictators and mirrors the treatment of China and its limitation of the press. You’re turning into a dictatorship with limits to the press.

And finally nothing is more pathetic than the official press secretary releasing a visibly doctored video to pretend to justify this malicious act of cowardice and your country is worse for it happening.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 2:05 am
by Foo
I don't know of any nations that would allow what Acosta tried to do. He was allowed to ask a question, then a follow up question. Then he wanted to start making commentary and the president moved to the next question. He then started to filibuster and refused to hand over the microphone. His network is not banned, as they are the agent with the press credentials. He lost his hard pass, which means he is no longer given the full privileges a respected White House staff reporter would have in terms of unfettered access.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 4:40 am
by showa58taro
Foo wrote:I don't know of any nations that would allow what Acosta tried to do. He was allowed to ask a question, then a follow up question. Then he wanted to start making commentary and the president moved to the next question. He then started to filibuster and refused to hand over the microphone. His network is not banned, as they are the agent with the press credentials. He lost his hard pass, which means he is no longer given the full privileges a respected White House staff reporter would have in terms of unfettered access.
All Western Democracies would and do.

Re: Liberals and the Manufactured Divide

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:09 am
by zombie
the media is the enemy of the people. the commander in chief encourages violence against reporters. if you challenge his position, you're fake news. accidental contact is "putting hands on" that's where we are now, for better or for worse.