HorrorMovieFans.com

red = 2 constantly involved in political infighting , agnostic
blue = 1 police should be armed
green = 4 doesn't hate furries, pro-lgbt, pro-choice, hates trump
yellow = 4 pro-free speech, wants all drugs to be legalized, anit-communist, free trade

Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 5:21 pm When working the google on unipartyism this political chart came up. It says too many in the blue top right and you are a unipartying dickweed. Which squares do you hit?

Good luck finding any useful information on Google regarding unipartyists. Lol.

Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 5:48 pm And I already know Jason is gonna light up the blue section like he's playing motherfuckin Twister, so he's got unipartying scum on lock and in pocket.

I am very deeply libertarian and lean right, though the political psychos on the left stretched the fuck out of the line that I might seem far right to some.

All drugs, zombs. You want your backyard to be le barrio de le Amsterdam, eh? Good free trade there.

Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:07 pm All drugs, zombs. You want your backyard to be le barrio de le Amsterdam, eh? Good free trade there.

i think that a lot of problems with illegal drugs, trafficking and cartels will go away if it's legal and well-regulated. it would probably help a bit with the border too.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:07 pm

Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 5:48 pm And I already know Jason is gonna light up the blue section like he's playing motherfuckin Twister, so he's got unipartying scum on lock and in pocket.

I am very deeply libertarian and lean right, though the political psychos on the left stretched the fuck out of the line that I might seem far right to some.

Accurate

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:02 pm red = 1 police should be armed
blue = 2 constantly involved in political infighting. agnostic
green = 4 doesn't hate furries, pro-lgbt, pro-choice, hates trump
yellow = 4 pro-free speech, wants all drugs to be legalized, anit-communist, free trade

Your red choice is actually blue

"woke" is another boogeyman word that means whatever you want it to mean. and no one on the left calls themselves that way.

Alright, imma count blocks and get back to youse

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:17 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:02 pm red = 1 police should be armed
blue = 2 constantly involved in political infighting. agnostic
green = 4 doesn't hate furries, pro-lgbt, pro-choice, hates trump
yellow = 4 pro-free speech, wants all drugs to be legalized, anit-communist, free trade

Your red choice is actually blue

good catch. i had it all mixed up.

Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 5:21 pm When working the google on unipartyism this political chart came up. It says too many in the blue top right and you are a unipartying dickweed. Which squares do you hit?

Red = 1:
Tanks are cool

Green = 1:
Doesn't hate furries. (They're fun to make fun of though. Hate is a strong word)

Blue = 9:
Degenerate
13/50 is an argument
Police should be armed
Based
Reject modernity, embrace tradition (this is a flaw, admittedly. )
Nationalist
Religious (I guess)
Pro Life
MAGA (though MAGA is less Authoritarian and more Libertarian. So should be yellow)

Yellow = 18:
Gamer
Pro free speech
Socially liberal, fiscal conservative
Anti communist/socialist
Free trade
Capitalism is best system so far
Elon Musk fan (I guess. Sorta on the fence)
Pro 2nd amendment
Patriotic
Wants China to fall
Wants to own a business
Hates taxes
Marijuana legal
Wants to own a gun (I do own)
Shall not be infringed
Makes new emails to evade free trials (once or twice maybe)
Individualist
Supports a free market

Actually yellow is 19 for me. I have said "commies"

Why you hate Ronnie?

Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:36 pm Why you hate Ronnie?

Let's go 11 for blue. Likes Ronald and also militarist.

So...

Red 1
Green 1
Blue 11
Yellow 19

if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:40 pm if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

"Shall not be infringed" is basically the "very" option. It's kinda on there twice. I am both.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:42 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:40 pm if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

"Shall not be infringed" is basically the "very" option. It's kinda on there twice. I am both.

shall not be infringed is more than gun rights though, no?

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:44 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:42 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:40 pm if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

"Shall not be infringed" is basically the "very" option. It's kinda on there twice. I am both.

shall not be infringed is more than gun rights though, no?

It's a direct quote from the 2nd amendment. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:47 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:44 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:42 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:40 pm if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

"Shall not be infringed" is basically the "very" option. It's kinda on there twice. I am both.

shall not be infringed is more than gun rights though, no?

It's a direct quote from the 2nd amendment. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

i know the quote. if it only relates to gun ownership, that's dumb.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:49 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:47 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:44 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:42 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:40 pm if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

"Shall not be infringed" is basically the "very" option. It's kinda on there twice. I am both.

shall not be infringed is more than gun rights though, no?

It's a direct quote from the 2nd amendment. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

i know the quote. if it only relates to gun ownership, that's dumb.

Depends on your interpretation of the article. If you're reading the quote and not trying to expand its meaning in your head, a citizen's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is kinda straight forward.