Re: Random Political Comments
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 2:26 am
It’s sad though to be so beholden to the cult of one personality.
For Maniacs, By The Maniacs
https://horrormoviefans.com/forums/
Yup. This is the most divided this country has been since I was born in December, 1974. No one really represents me. As of right now, I'd vote for Tulsi. I know that she is more central.,.but if anything, she is better than the jackass who is currently president. But thats who I have to settle for. Ugh.showa58taro wrote:It takes a blind kind of one-sidedness (some might call it bias) to believe everything your side does even in error is part of a grandiose scheme of awesome.Jmac Attack wrote:I'm living in a country in which both parties see "the other side" as enemies. I hate that we only have two parties to choose from. It divides people. But if ya don't have money that's donated from Corporations, you're fucked. This is not the America I knew growing up. We are better than this, and I truly hope we can rebound. Depressing, really.showa58taro wrote:LOL. Wow. Woooooow. That’s almost as bad a take as I can imagine anyone putting together.Jason wrote:It was specifically written for the democrats to read. lol. He's baiting them into pressing an advantage that they don't have (impeachment), so they can be torn down even further. The democrats are absolutely seething at the transcript release which is as clean as a whistle.showa58taro wrote:It was the best thing ever. Trumps team put together some weak counterpoints to try and avoid the hardest questions or to give generic answers. But instead of emailing it to Republicans they sent it to Democrats including Speaker Pelosi
Third parties are mostly always an option. Don't let any two-party partisan jackasses shame you or tell you otherwise. I've voted independent and third party candidates many times, and will do so again, so don't get it in your head it's not an option. That's what Republicans and Democrats want.Jmac Attack wrote:I'm living in a country in which both parties see "the other side" as enemies. I hate that we only have two parties to choose from. It divides people. But if ya don't have money that's donated from Corporations, you're fucked. This is not the America I knew growing up. We are better than this, and I truly hope we can rebound. Depressing, really.showa58taro wrote:LOL. Wow. Woooooow. That’s almost as bad a take as I can imagine anyone putting together.Jason wrote:It was specifically written for the democrats to read. lol. He's baiting them into pressing an advantage that they don't have (impeachment), so they can be torn down even further. The democrats are absolutely seething at the transcript release which is as clean as a whistle.showa58taro wrote:It was the best thing ever. Trumps team put together some weak counterpoints to try and avoid the hardest questions or to give generic answers. But instead of emailing it to Republicans they sent it to Democrats including Speaker Pelosi
That totally makes sense, and really is how I feel.Jigsaw wrote:Third parties are mostly always an option. Don't let any two-party partisan jackasses shame you or tell you otherwise. I've voted independent and third party candidates many times, and will do so again, so don't get it in your head it's not an option. That's what Republicans and Democrats want.Jmac Attack wrote:I'm living in a country in which both parties see "the other side" as enemies. I hate that we only have two parties to choose from. It divides people. But if ya don't have money that's donated from Corporations, you're fucked. This is not the America I knew growing up. We are better than this, and I truly hope we can rebound. Depressing, really.showa58taro wrote:LOL. Wow. Woooooow. That’s almost as bad a take as I can imagine anyone putting together.Jason wrote:It was specifically written for the democrats to read. lol. He's baiting them into pressing an advantage that they don't have (impeachment), so they can be torn down even further. The democrats are absolutely seething at the transcript release which is as clean as a whistle.showa58taro wrote:It was the best thing ever. Trumps team put together some weak counterpoints to try and avoid the hardest questions or to give generic answers. But instead of emailing it to Republicans they sent it to Democrats including Speaker Pelosi
How so? Maybe I'm a dreamer, lolshowa58taro wrote:It doesn’t reflect reality though. But it is a nice ideal.
Nothi g wrong with that. The reality is you’re in s two party system and often a third party vote just means that you’re not getting what you want as the “better” of the two will have one less vote. Sucks as to get 3rd party votes that count is hard. But there you go.Jmac Attack wrote:How so? Maybe I'm a dreamer, lolshowa58taro wrote:It doesn’t reflect reality though. But it is a nice ideal.
There's no 'better' when neither of the two candidates represent the people, which is exactly why I was proud to vote third party in 2016, and every election I have.showa58taro wrote:Nothi g wrong with that. The reality is you’re in s two party system and often a third party vote just means that you’re not getting what you want as the “better” of the two will have one less vote. Sucks as to get 3rd party votes that count is hard. But there you go.Jmac Attack wrote:How so? Maybe I'm a dreamer, lolshowa58taro wrote:It doesn’t reflect reality though. But it is a nice ideal.
That's one perspective. But it will never be fixed if we keep voting for the parties that want it broken.showa58taro wrote:It’s a catch 22. Sad but true my friend.
Voting third party isn't a blanket vote. There are right-leaning and left-leaning third parties, and I'd wager very few people randomly vote third party blindly (mainly because many ballots don't even have them on there). Voting third party is almost always based off the candidate as opposed to the Party. If the Green Party nominee pissed off some potential Green voters, do you think they'd take it and vote for them or look to the PSL, WWP, SWP, etc? I think the latter is a lot more likely.zombie wrote:'thid party" is just as much a cult vote as "democrat" or "republican", unless you have an individual you feel deserves your vote. voting to try to stick it to the bigger guys, is just the same as voting hilary because you don't like trump or whatever. go cults!
Indeed, which just shows how screwed up this country is, as millions like myself have zero representation and yet literally no reason to vote.showa58taro wrote:It’ll never be fixed by voting third party either. Hence catch 22. If you vote you lose as they won’t win in the system and nothing changes. If you don’t vote then nothing changes. If you fracture the system it probably doesn’t do enough. That’s the frustration.
like i said, if you have an individual candidate that earned your vote that election. cool. otherwise it's a cult vote, the same as anything else.Jigsaw wrote:Voting third party isn't a blanket vote. There are right-leaning and left-leaning third parties, and I'd wager very few people randomly vote third party blindly (mainly because many ballots don't even have them on there). Voting third party is almost always based off the candidate as opposed to the Party. If the Green Party nominee pissed off some potential Green voters, do you think they'd take it and vote for them or look to the PSL, WWP, SWP, etc? I think the latter is a lot more likely.zombie wrote:'thid party" is just as much a cult vote as "democrat" or "republican", unless you have an individual you feel deserves your vote. voting to try to stick it to the bigger guys, is just the same as voting hilary because you don't like trump or whatever. go cults!
I'm against cult voting to, but I don't see third party voting as nearly enabling that as partisan two-party voting does.
It’s a real issue that will need addressing at some point. Might mean fracturing the Senste a bit.Jigsaw wrote:Indeed, which just shows how screwed up this country is, as millions like myself have zero representation and yet literally no reason to vote.showa58taro wrote:It’ll never be fixed by voting third party either. Hence catch 22. If you vote you lose as they won’t win in the system and nothing changes. If you don’t vote then nothing changes. If you fracture the system it probably doesn’t do enough. That’s the frustration.