HorrorMovieFans.com

Reign in Blood wrote:Can somebody properly critique 3 from Hell please? Tigg has fallen and can't get up in the bathroom.

He fell way back with that favorable review for Alien: Resurrection

It's decentish. It's not as sharp as Devil's Rejects, and more coherent than House of 1000 Corpses. Missing Sid is a big issue, but understandable regarding his health, and I really would have preferred Richard Brake to just play Doomhead again rather than his new character that seemed half assed, merging 31 into the universe. The gore's good, it was nice seeing Dee Wallace play a against her usual casting type. Sheri-Moon has gotten better as an actress, I think people just can't get past her shrill voice. I gave it a B- last month, I still feel it's an appropriate grade.

i think i'm gonna force my way through house of 1000 corpses and the devil's rejects, for sid haig.

I would say that of all Sheri's shitty performances this was by far the worse it's so bad it moved into causing me physical irritation and suffering. This is complete honesty, in my opinion she is the worst actor/actress I have ever seen in a major motion picture.

Tiggnutz wrote:Gotta watch Gothic because I can't remember it

This is really weird stuff I didn't remember it being so weird

zombie wrote:

zombie wrote:so far, not sure what to make of strange color of your body's tears. a lot of it seems like just unrelated threads that don't really add up into the main story. at least not yet.

well, twenty minutes left. i like the creativity in the visuals. but for some reason it didn't pull me in, like the way other similar visual heavy films have, like lost highway or mandy and the like.

Could you make heads or tails of the camera beard guy subplot? That seemed to vanish into thin air

zombie wrote:so far, not sure what to make of strange color of your body's tears. a lot of it seems like just unrelated threads that don't really add up into the main story. at least not yet.

Also, have you ever noticed so many different camera close ups of eyes and the like. That felt like they really went close on so many shots.

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

zombie wrote:so far, not sure what to make of strange color of your body's tears. a lot of it seems like just unrelated threads that don't really add up into the main story. at least not yet.

well, twenty minutes left. i like the creativity in the visuals. but for some reason it didn't pull me in, like the way other similar visual heavy films have, like lost highway or mandy and the like.

Could you make heads or tails of the camera beard guy subplot? That seemed to vanish into thin air

i had the same thought. the narrative was far less important than the imagery.

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:so far, not sure what to make of strange color of your body's tears. a lot of it seems like just unrelated threads that don't really add up into the main story. at least not yet.

Also, have you ever noticed so many different camera close ups of eyes and the like. That felt like they really went close on so many shots.

no, can't say that i have. if there was more to tie together the visuals, i think it could have been pretty cool.

zombie wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

zombie wrote:so far, not sure what to make of strange color of your body's tears. a lot of it seems like just unrelated threads that don't really add up into the main story. at least not yet.

well, twenty minutes left. i like the creativity in the visuals. but for some reason it didn't pull me in, like the way other similar visual heavy films have, like lost highway or mandy and the like.

Could you make heads or tails of the camera beard guy subplot? That seemed to vanish into thin air

i had the same thought. the narrative was far less important than the imagery.

It almost acts as a series of dreams/ideas woven loosely together under the guise of a plot. But I think that’s the frustration of the film for me. It felt like it either could be more anthological or it needed to cohere a few of the strands. Fundamentally the best scenes and sequences, are not all serving the same direction.

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

zombie wrote:so far, not sure what to make of strange color of your body's tears. a lot of it seems like just unrelated threads that don't really add up into the main story. at least not yet.

well, twenty minutes left. i like the creativity in the visuals. but for some reason it didn't pull me in, like the way other similar visual heavy films have, like lost highway or mandy and the like.

Could you make heads or tails of the camera beard guy subplot? That seemed to vanish into thin air

i had the same thought. the narrative was far less important than the imagery.

It almost acts as a series of dreams/ideas woven loosely together under the guise of a plot. But I think that’s the frustration of the film for me. It felt like it either could be more anthological or it needed to cohere a few of the strands. Fundamentally the best scenes and sequences, are not all serving the same direction.

have you seen any other films from the director? do they suffer the same pitfalls?

zombie wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:so far, not sure what to make of strange color of your body's tears. a lot of it seems like just unrelated threads that don't really add up into the main story. at least not yet.

Also, have you ever noticed so many different camera close ups of eyes and the like. That felt like they really went close on so many shots.

no, can't say that i have. if there was more to tie together the visuals, i think it could have been pretty cool.

I definitely think the visuals were a cut above an average film. They definitely had a good plan for looks.

zombie wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

zombie wrote:so far, not sure what to make of strange color of your body's tears. a lot of it seems like just unrelated threads that don't really add up into the main story. at least not yet.

well, twenty minutes left. i like the creativity in the visuals. but for some reason it didn't pull me in, like the way other similar visual heavy films have, like lost highway or mandy and the like.

Could you make heads or tails of the camera beard guy subplot? That seemed to vanish into thin air

i had the same thought. the narrative was far less important than the imagery.

It almost acts as a series of dreams/ideas woven loosely together under the guise of a plot. But I think that’s the frustration of the film for me. It felt like it either could be more anthological or it needed to cohere a few of the strands. Fundamentally the best scenes and sequences, are not all serving the same direction.

have you seen any other films from the director? do they suffer the same pitfalls?

I have not. Might have to now, be interesting to see. Wonder if Prime has one.

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

zombie wrote:so far, not sure what to make of strange color of your body's tears. a lot of it seems like just unrelated threads that don't really add up into the main story. at least not yet.

well, twenty minutes left. i like the creativity in the visuals. but for some reason it didn't pull me in, like the way other similar visual heavy films have, like lost highway or mandy and the like.

Could you make heads or tails of the camera beard guy subplot? That seemed to vanish into thin air

i had the same thought. the narrative was far less important than the imagery.

It almost acts as a series of dreams/ideas woven loosely together under the guise of a plot. But I think that’s the frustration of the film for me. It felt like it either could be more anthological or it needed to cohere a few of the strands. Fundamentally the best scenes and sequences, are not all serving the same direction.

have you seen any other films from the director? do they suffer the same pitfalls?

I have not. Might have to now, be interesting to see. Wonder if Prime has one.

i think let the corpses tan is on prime. not sure if it's horror or not though.

zombie wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

zombie wrote:

zombie wrote:so far, not sure what to make of strange color of your body's tears. a lot of it seems like just unrelated threads that don't really add up into the main story. at least not yet.

well, twenty minutes left. i like the creativity in the visuals. but for some reason it didn't pull me in, like the way other similar visual heavy films have, like lost highway or mandy and the like.

Could you make heads or tails of the camera beard guy subplot? That seemed to vanish into thin air

i had the same thought. the narrative was far less important than the imagery.

It almost acts as a series of dreams/ideas woven loosely together under the guise of a plot. But I think that’s the frustration of the film for me. It felt like it either could be more anthological or it needed to cohere a few of the strands. Fundamentally the best scenes and sequences, are not all serving the same direction.

have you seen any other films from the director? do they suffer the same pitfalls?

I have not. Might have to now, be interesting to see. Wonder if Prime has one.

i think let the corpses tan is on prime. not sure if it's horror or not though.

Would have to wait till November if not I guess. Maybe.

I feel like I’ve heard of ABCs of Death. Or am I imagining that.

Hatchet III I'm not sure if I have ever watched this one

A.M.I.

Pretty weird slasher-like techno-horror. Good use of a phone.

Run! Bitch Run!

Ending was definitely weird and silly though.

Daeg Faerch is in this. His acting didn't seem quite this atrocious in Halloween.