HorrorMovieFans.com

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:I'm not on a side. I am a Conservative who prefers getting news on current events rather than hearing someone echo my frustration with the left.

I guess you're not going to explain that video I posted...

A YouTube video? "California has wildfires!". I guess I can find several media outlets that say that. Let me watch the video again.......

Forget it. You are too far gone.

R.I.P.

What? Change my mind fool! I love ya buddy

I think J-Mac has been watching some Steven Crowder.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:By the way, I love that you brought up Alex Jones. Much of what he does satirical, anyway. He is on a platform where you can choose what to watch, and he was silenced. More alarming stuff that people on the left conveniently ignore because most are brainwashed shills.

Funny that you don't claim to like him, but call his sharing of really fake news and call him satirical just because he is silly at times. People have believed the shit he says. Imagine if one of your kids was shot at Sandy Hook. Bet you'd call him a scumbag.

I simply don't care about Alex Jones. I don't know everything he's said about Sandy Hook either, which should show you just how much I pay attention to him. I don't believe Sandy Hook was staged, but there is alarming videos that are unanswered and makes you wonder things. But to shut your brain off from the get-go is completely ignorant.

Jmac Attack wrote:

zombie wrote:looks like the news media is living up to how trump characterizes them, for whatever purpose.

This, I can get with.

So you can get with the entire reason I created this thread.

Awesome. Too bad it had to come from a non-Conservative's mouth before you agreed. But awesome.

Reign in Blood wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:I'm not on a side. I am a Conservative who prefers getting news on current events rather than hearing someone echo my frustration with the left.

I guess you're not going to explain that video I posted...

A YouTube video? "California has wildfires!". I guess I can find several media outlets that say that. Let me watch the video again.......

Forget it. You are too far gone.

R.I.P.

What? Change my mind fool! I love ya buddy

I think J-Mac has been watching some Steven Crowder.

Who the fuck is that Mr Rush Limbaugh? Lmao

Jmac Attack wrote:

Reign in Blood wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:I'm not on a side. I am a Conservative who prefers getting news on current events rather than hearing someone echo my frustration with the left.

I guess you're not going to explain that video I posted...

A YouTube video? "California has wildfires!". I guess I can find several media outlets that say that. Let me watch the video again.......

Forget it. You are too far gone.

R.I.P.

What? Change my mind fool! I love ya buddy

I think J-Mac has been watching some Steven Crowder.

Who the fuck is that Mr Rush Limbaugh? Lmao

Are you really that out of touch with politics that you don't know who Steven Crowder is?

male privilege, now? i've never heard that used as a term, til just now.

Jason wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Reign in Blood wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jason wrote:I'm not on a side. I am a Conservative who prefers getting news on current events rather than hearing someone echo my frustration with the left.

I guess you're not going to explain that video I posted...

A YouTube video? "California has wildfires!". I guess I can find several media outlets that say that. Let me watch the video again.......

Forget it. You are too far gone.

R.I.P.

What? Change my mind fool! I love ya buddy

I think J-Mac has been watching some Steven Crowder.

Who the fuck is that Mr Rush Limbaugh? Lmao

Are you really that out of touch with politics that you don't know who Steven Crowder is?

I've heard the name, for sure. But don't read his articles or whatever.

Jason wrote:

2nd edition is better.

Reign in Blood wrote:2nd edition is better.

They are gold, for the most part. And the difference is Crowder is always coming from a place of generating a real political discussion from people who oppose his viewpoints. Sometimes it's peaceful. A lot of the time you get this guy...

Jason wrote:

Reign in Blood wrote:2nd edition is better.

They are gold, for the most part. And the difference is Crowder is always coming from a place of generating a real political discussion from people who oppose his viewpoints. Sometimes it's peaceful. A lot of the time you get this guy...

he's good at making it appear to be that he wants a real discussion. but i don't think that's his purpose. he's not coming from a place of hearing you out. he's coming from a place of shutting your opinion down and proving you wrong.

Wait. Are you serious???

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

Reign in Blood wrote:2nd edition is better.

They are gold, for the most part. And the difference is Crowder is always coming from a place of generating a real political discussion from people who oppose his viewpoints. Sometimes it's peaceful. A lot of the time you get this guy...

he's good at making it appear to be that he wants a real discussion. but i don't think that's his purpose. he's not coming from a place of hearing you out. he's coming from a place of shutting your opinion down and proving you wrong.

I think maybe you feel that way because that's what he usually does. lol.

showa58taro wrote:Wait. Are you serious???

Uh-oh. Seb has arrived.

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

Reign in Blood wrote:2nd edition is better.

They are gold, for the most part. And the difference is Crowder is always coming from a place of generating a real political discussion from people who oppose his viewpoints. Sometimes it's peaceful. A lot of the time you get this guy...

he's good at making it appear to be that he wants a real discussion. but i don't think that's his purpose. he's not coming from a place of hearing you out. he's coming from a place of shutting your opinion down and proving you wrong.

I think maybe you feel that way because that's what he usually does. lol.

he usually does that cause it's his purpose. he asks random people, as someone who makes a living off of politics. he's informed and prepared on the subjects. and he asks random people for an opinion.

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

Reign in Blood wrote:2nd edition is better.

They are gold, for the most part. And the difference is Crowder is always coming from a place of generating a real political discussion from people who oppose his viewpoints. Sometimes it's peaceful. A lot of the time you get this guy...

he's good at making it appear to be that he wants a real discussion. but i don't think that's his purpose. he's not coming from a place of hearing you out. he's coming from a place of shutting your opinion down and proving you wrong.

I think maybe you feel that way because that's what he usually does. lol.

he usually does that cause it's his purpose. he asks random people, as someone who makes a living off of politics. he's informed and prepared on the subjects. and he asks random people for an opinion.

Should he invite Jake Tapper to do a private one?

I believe Crowder invited Cenk from the Young Turks to debate but he declined. Instead, Cenk went to politicon and got set on fire by Ben Shapiro for an hour. lol

zombie wrote:he usually does that cause it's his purpose. he asks random people, as someone who makes a living off of politics. he's informed and prepared on the subjects. and he asks random people for an opinion.

The platform is to allow anyone to join in on the discussion, by the way. If Obama walked by he could sit down if he wanted to.

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

Reign in Blood wrote:2nd edition is better.

They are gold, for the most part. And the difference is Crowder is always coming from a place of generating a real political discussion from people who oppose his viewpoints. Sometimes it's peaceful. A lot of the time you get this guy...

he's good at making it appear to be that he wants a real discussion. but i don't think that's his purpose. he's not coming from a place of hearing you out. he's coming from a place of shutting your opinion down and proving you wrong.

I think maybe you feel that way because that's what he usually does. lol.

he usually does that cause it's his purpose. he asks random people, as someone who makes a living off of politics. he's informed and prepared on the subjects. and he asks random people for an opinion.

Should he invite Jake Tapper to do a private one?

you must be asking cause he says he has reached out? he should do whatever he wants to do. i'd be curious to see it happen.

Jason wrote:

Reign in Blood wrote:2nd edition is better.

They are gold, for the most part. And the difference is Crowder is always coming from a place of generating a real political discussion from people who oppose his viewpoints. Sometimes it's peaceful. A lot of the time you get this guy...

While that guy delved into douchebaggery, he was in a highly emotional and triggered state. The 2nd edition featured typical, poli-sci libs spouting non-sense, checking shit on their phone and shiz while Crowder owned them. And then, he gets minorities to have an actual rational discussion (imagine that!). While lolz can be had, just a solid episode.