HorrorMovieFans.com

The whole argument is stupid He's a piece of shit just like every other person who kills people. I dont care if you are doing it for an imaginary man in the sky or your poor or your feelings are hurt becuase life aint fare. Some people are just bad period.

"Your mass murderers get treated better than other mass murderers" a new low in identify politics

Foo wrote:
Demonizing white people is what social justice is boiling down to. Just saying...

You can say anything about white people and it is fine, but say anything about a group who is even coincidentally primarily black and racism in invoked.

but i'm not demonizing white people. and i've pointed out racism directed at caucasians.

showa58taro wrote:You guys have literally made the point for us with your “but blacks” argument. Lol

So you post racist and inaccurate articles about white privilege as evidence, and dong think race will be used in the rebuttal?

That is like posting articles about cats being better than dogs, and then getting offended when someone gives you facts about cats and dogs.

Foo wrote:

showa58taro wrote:You guys have literally made the point for us with your “but blacks” argument. Lol

So you post racist and inaccurate articles about white privilege as evidence, and dong think race will be used in the rebuttal?

That is like posting articles about cats being better than dogs, and then getting offended when someone gives you facts about cats and dogs.

You’ve misunderstood the point of the article entirely methinks.

showa58taro wrote:

Foo wrote:

showa58taro wrote:You guys have literally made the point for us with your “but blacks” argument. Lol

So you post racist and inaccurate articles about white privilege as evidence, and dong think race will be used in the rebuttal?

That is like posting articles about cats being better than dogs, and then getting offended when someone gives you facts about cats and dogs.

You’ve misunderstood the point of the article entirely methinks.

Every article that dildo writes is the same. Literally ALL Shaun King does is make money by race baiting. His nickname is "Talcum X".

The only point is to keep Shaun King's name out there and you willfully obliged. The shooter was not labeled a terrorist immediately because there was no evidence to do so. When a Muslim is running around smashing people with a machete yelling about Allah, of course it is easier to label.

Foo wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

Foo wrote:

showa58taro wrote:You guys have literally made the point for us with your “but blacks” argument. Lol

So you post racist and inaccurate articles about white privilege as evidence, and dong think race will be used in the rebuttal?

That is like posting articles about cats being better than dogs, and then getting offended when someone gives you facts about cats and dogs.

You’ve misunderstood the point of the article entirely methinks.

Every article that dildo writes is the same. Literally ALL Shaun King does is make money by race baiting. His nickname is "Talcum X".

The only point is to keep Shaun King's name out there and you willfully obliged. The shooter was not labeled a terrorist immediately because there was no evidence to do so. When a Muslim is running around smashing people with a machete yelling about Allah, of course it is easier to label.

If there’s a bombing Trump tweets about terrorism before anything is known. That’s the world we inhabit. There’s never a connection or grouping to a white shooter. But black or Muslim and there’s an automatic association. That’s the privileged point.

showa58taro wrote:

Foo wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

Foo wrote:

showa58taro wrote:You guys have literally made the point for us with your “but blacks” argument. Lol

So you post racist and inaccurate articles about white privilege as evidence, and dong think race will be used in the rebuttal?

That is like posting articles about cats being better than dogs, and then getting offended when someone gives you facts about cats and dogs.

You’ve misunderstood the point of the article entirely methinks.

Every article that dildo writes is the same. Literally ALL Shaun King does is make money by race baiting. His nickname is "Talcum X".

The only point is to keep Shaun King's name out there and you willfully obliged. The shooter was not labeled a terrorist immediately because there was no evidence to do so. When a Muslim is running around smashing people with a machete yelling about Allah, of course it is easier to label.

If there’s a bombing Trump tweets about terrorism before anything is known. That’s the world we inhabit. There’s never a connection or grouping to a white shooter. But black or Muslim and there’s an automatic association. That’s the privileged point.

Again, when the killer makes their motivation clear by shouting about Allah, is a recent immigrant from certain regions, is on a watch list, etc., you have a much clearer motivation than someone who has lived a rather isolated life.

Foo wrote:
Every article that dildo writes is the same. Literally ALL Shaun King does is make money by race baiting. His nickname is "Talcum X".

The only point is to keep Shaun King's name out there and you willfully obliged. The shooter was not labeled a terrorist immediately because there was no evidence to do so. When a Muslim is running around smashing people with a machete yelling about Allah, of course it is easier to label.

it is easier to label that way. sure. if someone is wearing a police uniform and shoots a civilian, blame him. but don't blame all cops. don't ask why all cops are violent pigs. that was the point that seb seemed to be focusing on, as it relates to race or creed.

So, like we shouldn't be blaming America by kneeling for the anthem and such.

no, don't blame america. but you can protest certain things going on in america.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
Every article that dildo writes is the same. Literally ALL Shaun King does is make money by race baiting. His nickname is "Talcum X".

The only point is to keep Shaun King's name out there and you willfully obliged. The shooter was not labeled a terrorist immediately because there was no evidence to do so. When a Muslim is running around smashing people with a machete yelling about Allah, of course it is easier to label.

it is easier to label that way. sure. if someone is wearing a police uniform and shoots a civilian, blame him. but don't blame all cops. don't ask why all cops are violent pigs. that was the point that seb seemed to be focusing on, as it relates to race or creed.

Pretty much.

zombie wrote:no, don't blame america. but you can protest certain things going on in america.

Sure, like Firefly being cancelled. Kneel for the anthem. Makes as much sense as any other reason I have seen.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:no, don't blame america. but you can protest certain things going on in america.

Sure, like Firefly being cancelled. Kneel for the anthem. Makes as much sense as any other reason I have seen.

it's funny how you have to twist everything to suit your agenda, rather than actually discussing or debating the topic as it is.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:no, don't blame america. but you can protest certain things going on in america.

Sure, like Firefly being cancelled. Kneel for the anthem. Makes as much sense as any other reason I have seen.

it's funny how you have to twist everything to suit your agenda, rather than actually discussing or debating the topic as it is.

Funny if it was not so boring and predictable.

I can understand people being upset about a horrible loss of life but this is beyond absurd. Some mass murderers are being treated unfairly...really? 59 people murdered hundreds more wounded but hey at least it was a white guy who did it. Only white people are vile enough to all be judged the same.

Tiggnutz wrote:I can understand people being upset about a horrible loss of life but this is beyond absurd. Some mass murderers are being treated unfairly...really? 59 people murdered hundreds more wounded but hey at least it was a white guy who did it. Only white people are vile enough to all be judged the same.

the article was not about treating the shooter unfairly. it was about labeling him a lone wolf and not looking at it as indicative of a bigger issue among caucasians, as opposed to the way the author (and presumably seb) feels is done with violence by minorities.

but i disagree that it only happens with minorities, myself. it's an issue on all sides. and i do think it needs to stop.

zombie wrote:

Tiggnutz wrote:I can understand people being upset about a horrible loss of life but this is beyond absurd. Some mass murderers are being treated unfairly...really? 59 people murdered hundreds more wounded but hey at least it was a white guy who did it. Only white people are vile enough to all be judged the same.

the article was not about treating the shooter unfairly. it was about labeling him a lone wolf and not looking at it as indicative of a bigger issue among caucasians, as opposed to the way the author (and presumably seb) feels is done with violence by minorities.

but i disagree that it only happens with minorities, myself. it's an issue on all sides. and i do think it needs to stop.

Its garbage journalism picking at open wounds of racial tension.

Tiggnutz wrote:

zombie wrote:

Tiggnutz wrote:I can understand people being upset about a horrible loss of life but this is beyond absurd. Some mass murderers are being treated unfairly...really? 59 people murdered hundreds more wounded but hey at least it was a white guy who did it. Only white people are vile enough to all be judged the same.

the article was not about treating the shooter unfairly. it was about labeling him a lone wolf and not looking at it as indicative of a bigger issue among caucasians, as opposed to the way the author (and presumably seb) feels is done with violence by minorities.

but i disagree that it only happens with minorities, myself. it's an issue on all sides. and i do think it needs to stop.

Its garbage journalism picking at open wounds of racial tension.

i don't know how to heal those wounds or ease those tensions, if we don't try to address it in some way.

zombie wrote:

Tiggnutz wrote:

zombie wrote:

Tiggnutz wrote:I can understand people being upset about a horrible loss of life but this is beyond absurd. Some mass murderers are being treated unfairly...really? 59 people murdered hundreds more wounded but hey at least it was a white guy who did it. Only white people are vile enough to all be judged the same.

the article was not about treating the shooter unfairly. it was about labeling him a lone wolf and not looking at it as indicative of a bigger issue among caucasians, as opposed to the way the author (and presumably seb) feels is done with violence by minorities.

but i disagree that it only happens with minorities, myself. it's an issue on all sides. and i do think it needs to stop.

Its garbage journalism picking at open wounds of racial tension.

i don't know how to heal those wounds or ease those tensions, if we don't try to address it in some way.

Cutting this bullshit out would be a good start