Page 2 of 12
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 11:06 am
by showa58taro
Weinstein seems to be a creepy douche. Claiming to be feminist supportive whilst being a creep. What a hypocrite. Luckily the right never does that. How’s the Anti-abortion senator doing?
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 11:49 am
by Tiggnutz
Harvey is a sick fuck and sounds like a good candidate for chemical castration.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 1:20 pm
by Jmac Attack
showa58taro wrote:Weinstein seems to be a creepy douche. Claiming to be feminist supportive whilst being a creep. What a hypocrite. Luckily the right never does that. How’s the Anti-abortion senator doing?
Exactly. Hipocrites everywhere.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 1:26 pm
by Jmac Attack
Foo wrote:showa58taro wrote:Foo wrote:Don't see that the guy was convicted or a known child molester when Trump (or the Clintons) associated with him. Seemed like that came out later and he has been out of that loop since.
There’s always an excuse for trump isn’t there.
I guess that tends to happen when the guy is pulled into a conversation that has nothing to do with him because of zombie's obsession with tearing him down.
Uhhhh.....the obsession is the opposite. Look in the mirror. You can't say anything bad about him. At all. It's funny, because I am keeping track of all the good things I say about Trump. It's been 4 times in three weeks. I have heard crickets. I can't wait for you to tell my that I just hate him to hate him. Lulz. Carry on.......
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 1:27 pm
by Jmac Attack
Tiggnutz wrote:Harvey is a sick fuck and sounds like a good candidate for chemical castration.
This.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:48 pm
by Reign in Blood
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:51 pm
by Foo
Jmac Attack wrote:Foo wrote:showa58taro wrote:Foo wrote:Don't see that the guy was convicted or a known child molester when Trump (or the Clintons) associated with him. Seemed like that came out later and he has been out of that loop since.
There’s always an excuse for trump isn’t there.
I guess that tends to happen when the guy is pulled into a conversation that has nothing to do with him because of zombie's obsession with tearing him down.
Uhhhh.....the obsession is the opposite. Look in the mirror. You can't say anything bad about him. At all. It's funny, because I am keeping track of all the good things I say about Trump. It's been 4 times in three weeks. I have heard crickets. I can't wait for you to tell my that I just hate him to hate him. Lulz. Carry on.......
Did you build a special phone app for this purpose, or do you keep a little tiny notepad in your pocket?
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:19 pm
by Headhunter
Conservatives said nothing about Roger Ailes. They should have some self respect and admit they don't actually care about the allegations, just that they can tie it to "the enemy".
Partisan hackery everywhere.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:24 pm
by Headhunter
But I'll give the OP a fair shake and break it down. Making a big deal about this because it's tied to liberals/Democrats means one of two things:
1. You hold Democrats to a higher moral standard and believe the behavior would be acceptable from Republicans.
2. You're being a partisan hack who insults victims by dragging their stories through the mud for political brownie points.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:34 pm
by Foo
There are no victims in this as far as I have seen. There is no rape, there is one group of opportunists versus the other.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:36 pm
by Foo
It is like a "feminist" battle royal. Keep hoping Joss Whedon will chime in.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:37 pm
by Headhunter
However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:41 pm
by Foo
Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:44 pm
by Headhunter
Foo wrote:Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:46 pm
by Headhunter
This section is just a click-bait Breitbart knock off at this point.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:47 pm
by zombie
Headhunter wrote:Foo wrote:Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.
maybe it would be more interesting if i left it alone?
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:48 pm
by Headhunter
zombie wrote:Headhunter wrote:Foo wrote:Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.
maybe it would be more interesting if i left it alone?
I do think it's curious that you engage every time, but you're a good dude that way. You know what the deal is every time, nothing's going to change.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:50 pm
by zombie
Headhunter wrote:zombie wrote:Headhunter wrote:Foo wrote:Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.
maybe it would be more interesting if i left it alone?
I do think it's curious that you engage every time, but you're a good dude that way. You know what the deal is every time, nothing's going to change.
it just feels like it needs to be challenged. that's my shortcoming, i guess.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:54 pm
by Foo
Headhunter wrote:Foo wrote:Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.
I have taken this section under my wing and tried to generate discussion. Of course if I am making most of the threads it is going to tilt to my personality.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:54 pm
by Headhunter
Foo, I do really respect that you're at least honest about the partisan nature of this stuff. We both know there are too many conservatives who constantly do the run-around bullshit to not offend 75% of the country. The semantics and the games with this stuff are annoying.