HorrorMovieFans.com

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jason wrote:Matt and Trey of South Park came out as Republicans to a bunch of liberals at a Hollywood award show. lol. "No, seriously. We're republicans".

Stunning and brave.

Look at what liberals have been doing with de facto censorship, whether it be blackballing or going after sponsors of people with differing opinions, or removing monuments. Given their business is social commentary, it should be no surprise.

*look at what people in the name of politics, in general, have been doing with de-facto censorship.

Yup. Both sides pisses me off. Both do it. It's ok if it's under the guise of conservatism, I guess? Lol

How many careers have conservatives been killing because they disagree or because of nothing more than allegations?

you're including accusations of rape, now, as censorship? that's a whole other thing to me.

It is all one sided opinions without evidence to punish or silence.

conservatives try to censor or control people's freedom of speech in different ways. but they still do it. "fake news" is a favorite, lately. calling people anti-american is another. it needs to stop on both sides.

and the false allegations, albeit another issue altogether, need to stop as well.

Conservatives have never wanted to ban books and shit.....like ever. Not sure who is worse, Foo.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jason wrote:Matt and Trey of South Park came out as Republicans to a bunch of liberals at a Hollywood award show. lol. "No, seriously. We're republicans".

Stunning and brave.

Look at what liberals have been doing with de facto censorship, whether it be blackballing or going after sponsors of people with differing opinions, or removing monuments. Given their business is social commentary, it should be no surprise.

*look at what people in the name of politics, in general, have been doing with de-facto censorship.

Yup. Both sides pisses me off. Both do it. It's ok if it's under the guise of conservatism, I guess? Lol

How many careers have conservatives been killing because they disagree or because of nothing more than allegations?

you're including accusations of rape, now, as censorship? that's a whole other thing to me.

It is all one sided opinions without evidence to punish or silence.

conservatives try to censor or control people's freedom of speech in different ways. but they still do it. "fake news" is a favorite, lately. calling people anti-american is another. it needs to stop on both sides.

and the false allegations, albeit another issue altogether, need to stop as well.

How is calling something "fake news" or anti-American in any way equivalent to trying to take people's livelihood away? Liberals are the ones threatening the careers of people and intimidating them. It is scary and completely one sided.

Extremist Muslims are conservative in their ideology as some far right wing Christian's are. We can use examples all day.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jason wrote:Matt and Trey of South Park came out as Republicans to a bunch of liberals at a Hollywood award show. lol. "No, seriously. We're republicans".

Stunning and brave.

Look at what liberals have been doing with de facto censorship, whether it be blackballing or going after sponsors of people with differing opinions, or removing monuments. Given their business is social commentary, it should be no surprise.

*look at what people in the name of politics, in general, have been doing with de-facto censorship.

Yup. Both sides pisses me off. Both do it. It's ok if it's under the guise of conservatism, I guess? Lol

How many careers have conservatives been killing because they disagree or because of nothing more than allegations?

you're including accusations of rape, now, as censorship? that's a whole other thing to me.

It is all one sided opinions without evidence to punish or silence.

conservatives try to censor or control people's freedom of speech in different ways. but they still do it. "fake news" is a favorite, lately. calling people anti-american is another. it needs to stop on both sides.

and the false allegations, albeit another issue altogether, need to stop as well.

How is calling something "fake news" or anti-American in any way equivalent to trying to take people's livelihood away? Liberals are the ones threatening the careers of people and intimidating them. It is scary and completely one sided.

Calling facts fake news could be considered a form of censorship, I guess.

Jmac Attack wrote:Conservatives have never wanted to ban books and shit.....like ever. Not sure who is worse, Foo.

Tell me what books conservatives are trying to ban.

Talking about banning, not just keeping from children because of inappropriate content.

Let's talk about liberal misinformation and censorship...like this:

http://www.livetradingnews.com/runaway- ... sEvhJch3IU

Conservative- "I don't care if he is gay or not, I just don't wanna see him kissing other fellers in public!"

I guess shaming people to be silent is not censorship?

Foo wrote:
How is calling something "fake news" or anti-American in any way equivalent to trying to take people's livelihood away? Liberals are the ones threatening the careers of people and intimidating them. It is scary and completely one sided.

it is scary. it is not onesided. i've read, flat out on these boards, that the nfl players should all get the boot. and even trump has suggested it. it is not the same as accusing someone of a crime, falsely. but it is about affecting their livelihood, still. it should stop on both sides.

Jmac Attack wrote:Extremist Muslims are conservative in their ideology as some far right wing Christian's are. We can use examples all day.

Is this an example of bias and false equivalency?

There are not entire communities of Christians who will kill you for not sharing their beliefs. You can be a proud Jew and prance right through Vatican City. Wanna try the same thing in about 10 Muslim nations?

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Conservatives have never wanted to ban books and shit.....like ever. Not sure who is worse, Foo.

Tell me what books conservatives are trying to ban.

Talking about banning, not just keeping from children because of inappropriate content.

Let's talk about liberal misinformation and censorship...like this:

http://www.livetradingnews.com/runaway- ... sEvhJch3IU

Not disagreeing with you about liberals. Just pointing out that you're brainwashed.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
How is calling something "fake news" or anti-American in any way equivalent to trying to take people's livelihood away? Liberals are the ones threatening the careers of people and intimidating them. It is scary and completely one sided.

it is scary. it is not onesided. i've read, flat out on these boards, that the nfl players should all get the boot. and even trump has suggested it. it is not the same as accusing someone of a crime, falsely. but it is about affecting their livelihood, still. it should stop on both sides.

Yup, even our president said these NFL players should be fired. Lmfao. What was that again, Foo?

Jmac Attack wrote:Conservative- "I don't care if he is gay or not, I just don't wanna see him kissing other fellers in public!"

I guess shaming people to be silent is not censorship?

No, It isn't. If it was a liberal taboo, you would hunt him down on social media, stalk them to find out where they work, and then try to get them fired.

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Extremist Muslims are conservative in their ideology as some far right wing Christian's are. We can use examples all day.

Is this an example of bias and false equivalency?

There are not entire communities of Christians who will kill you for not sharing their beliefs. You can be a proud Jew and prance right through Vatican City. Wanna try the same thing in about 10 Muslim nations?

You should never accuse me of false equivalency. But I would say yeah, I kinda did it. You're great at it. Lol.

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Conservative- "I don't care if he is gay or not, I just don't wanna see him kissing other fellers in public!"

I guess shaming people to be silent is not censorship?

No, It isn't. If it was a liberal taboo, you would hunt him down on social media, stalk them to find out where they work, and then try to get them fired.

Which is BS too.

Jmac Attack wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
How is calling something "fake news" or anti-American in any way equivalent to trying to take people's livelihood away? Liberals are the ones threatening the careers of people and intimidating them. It is scary and completely one sided.

it is scary. it is not onesided. i've read, flat out on these boards, that the nfl players should all get the boot. and even trump has suggested it. it is not the same as accusing someone of a crime, falsely. but it is about affecting their livelihood, still. it should stop on both sides.

Yup, even our president said these NFL players should be fired. Lmfao. What was that again, Foo?

Yup, he stated an opinion. See the difference between that and trying to get them fired?

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
How is calling something "fake news" or anti-American in any way equivalent to trying to take people's livelihood away? Liberals are the ones threatening the careers of people and intimidating them. It is scary and completely one sided.

it is scary. it is not onesided. i've read, flat out on these boards, that the nfl players should all get the boot. and even trump has suggested it. it is not the same as accusing someone of a crime, falsely. but it is about affecting their livelihood, still. it should stop on both sides.

Yup, even our president said these NFL players should be fired. Lmfao. What was that again, Foo?

Yup, he stated an opinion. See the difference between that and trying to get them fired?

yes, he tried to get them fired in a different, less direct way.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Conservative- "I don't care if he is gay or not, I just don't wanna see him kissing other fellers in public!"

I guess shaming people to be silent is not censorship?

No, It isn't. If it was a liberal taboo, you would hunt him down on social media, stalk them to find out where they work, and then try to get them fired.

Which is BS too.

One is opinion and the other is petty, vindictive, and the opposite of free speech.

There is nothing wrong with finding gay people disgusting. There is plenty wrong with outing a gay person, trying to get them fired, or otherwise damaging their career.

Didn't Google just fire some liberal for her beliefs? I swear I just read about it. It's a problem for both sides. I don't think liberals have the Monopoly on doing unamerican Shit. Is all I am saying.

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:
How is calling something "fake news" or anti-American in any way equivalent to trying to take people's livelihood away? Liberals are the ones threatening the careers of people and intimidating them. It is scary and completely one sided.

it is scary. it is not onesided. i've read, flat out on these boards, that the nfl players should all get the boot. and even trump has suggested it. it is not the same as accusing someone of a crime, falsely. but it is about affecting their livelihood, still. it should stop on both sides.

Yup, even our president said these NFL players should be fired. Lmfao. What was that again, Foo?

Yup, he stated an opinion. See the difference between that and trying to get them fired?

yes, he tried to get them fired in a different, less direct way.

No, he didn't. Point to the evidence he did what you claim?

Ask Great Britian and conservatives about banning books. oh, my bad. . It's just liberals.