Whether he can or not can be debated if that's the idea here. But he's on record months ago listing all kinds of preventative measures that are not being taken and saying California is extra susceptible to catastrophe if they continue to ignore these things. They continued, California burns.
California Burning
Forum rules
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
Re: California Burning


- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11900
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: California Burning
And the 50% who don’t just suck Trump’s dick while he shits on them (that’s even assuming all of them wouldn’t take issue with his ignorance and that’s not true) are all fat DEI lesbos, right?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:59 pmTo be fair to myself. I am often on here more than anyone acknowledging that at the end of the day I largely don't know shit and have to use my own judgment to the best of my abilities. Not surprised that went unnoticed, tbh.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:51 pmNo it’s very relevant actually.Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:46 pmAnecdotal and irrelevant. But I know one.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:44 pmHow many LAFD firefighters do you know personally?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:42 pmAgree to disagree.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:41 pmYou’re being incredibly disrespectful and you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:40 pmYou really think the vast majority of firemen do not support Trump. Do you really genuinely believe it's even close? It's not.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:38 pmWhy are you pretending to know what thousands of firefighters think to try to score online political points?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:48 pmIf we're gonna go that route I'm entirely certain that if you ask every fireman that isn't an put of shape DEI lesbo what they thought of Trump and what he said, 99.9% would agree with him.Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:44 pm I'm sure the firemen adore Trump calling efforts incompetent and questioning what's wrong with them, why can't they just put out these easy fires.
You really think his comments were aimed toward firemen? You genuinely believe that?
I know two. One is a Democrat, one is a probably slightly right leaning centrist, more Libertarian. They’re both white guys, not “out of shape DEI lesbos”. Neither like Trump. Obviously I know the only ones in LAFD, right?
Occasionally it might be good for you to have the humility to acknowledge you don’t know what you’re talking about instead of trying to win a stupid argument all the time.
Anyway, here's this. The IAFF polled around 300,000 of their union firefighters to see who they preferred in 2016. The results are overwhelming. I doubt they shifted for Kamala.
Not that it really matters who they like or don't like. The idiots in California are fully responsible for not taking ANY preventative measures to ensure a wildfire doesn't get so out of hand that the entire city is gone. But here we are. And we're in this thread whining about Trump again.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 10733
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: California Burning
You know where the Don can help? Use all of his real estate "expertise" to cut the bullshit here. The Rebuild is gonna take longer than all of our lives. Here you need Permit to remove debris. Permit to start construction. Engineering approval for new structure. HOA approval for structure. Environmental study. City/county approval for new structure. Permit for the homeless to stay in your home. Study to make sure no ants will be harmed during construction. Permit for the toxins from Newsom's hair gel. It's fucking redick. The Don can help that, yeah no?

Re: California Burning
Twisting his words to imply they were directed toward the firefighters is totally disingenuous.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 8:03 pmAnd the 50% who don’t just suck Trump’s dick while he shits on them (that’s even assuming all of them wouldn’t take issue with his ignorance and that’s not true) are all fat DEI lesbos, right?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:59 pmTo be fair to myself. I am often on here more than anyone acknowledging that at the end of the day I largely don't know shit and have to use my own judgment to the best of my abilities. Not surprised that went unnoticed, tbh.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:51 pmNo it’s very relevant actually.Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:46 pmAnecdotal and irrelevant. But I know one.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:44 pmHow many LAFD firefighters do you know personally?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:42 pmAgree to disagree.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:41 pmYou’re being incredibly disrespectful and you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:40 pmYou really think the vast majority of firemen do not support Trump. Do you really genuinely believe it's even close? It's not.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:38 pmWhy are you pretending to know what thousands of firefighters think to try to score online political points?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:48 pmIf we're gonna go that route I'm entirely certain that if you ask every fireman that isn't an put of shape DEI lesbo what they thought of Trump and what he said, 99.9% would agree with him.Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:44 pm I'm sure the firemen adore Trump calling efforts incompetent and questioning what's wrong with them, why can't they just put out these easy fires.
You really think his comments were aimed toward firemen? You genuinely believe that?
I know two. One is a Democrat, one is a probably slightly right leaning centrist, more Libertarian. They’re both white guys, not “out of shape DEI lesbos”. Neither like Trump. Obviously I know the only ones in LAFD, right?
Occasionally it might be good for you to have the humility to acknowledge you don’t know what you’re talking about instead of trying to win a stupid argument all the time.
Anyway, here's this. The IAFF polled around 300,000 of their union firefighters to see who they preferred in 2016. The results are overwhelming. I doubt they shifted for Kamala.
Not that it really matters who they like or don't like. The idiots in California are fully responsible for not taking ANY preventative measures to ensure a wildfire doesn't get so out of hand that the entire city is gone. But here we are. And we're in this thread whining about Trump again.
Also, no. Not all who voted against Trump are fat DEI lesbos, however, all fat DEI lesbos likely did not check the Trump box (imo).



Re: California Burning
If the rumors are true, Gavin is already working with developers to design apartments where all the beautiful homes are currently ashes. So there's that. If that is indeed true, I think that any outrage should be directed that way as opposed to twisting words of a statement from another guy who bears zero responsibility and actually laid the blueprint of preventative measures that were not taken by Gavin or any other politician in L.A.Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 8:07 pm You know where the Don can help? Use all of his real estate "expertise" to cut the bullshit here. The Rebuild is gonna take longer than all of our lives. Here you need Permit to remove debris. Permit to start construction. Engineering approval for new structure. HOA approval for structure. Environmental study. City/county approval for new structure. Permit for the homeless to stay in your home. Study to make sure no ants will be harmed during construction. Permit for the toxins from Newsom's hair gel. It's fucking redick. The Don can help that, yeah no?


- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11900
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: California Burning
Actually I would guarantee a much higher percentage of lesbian firefighters would vote for Trump than the general population of lesbians. Through my work I have met plenty of gay people in law enforcement, most of them lesbians. It’s probably pretty close to 50/50, maybe 60/40 blue with their politics. There is really a lot more nuance to this stuff than you believe.Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 8:08 pmTwisting his words to imply they were directed toward the firefighters is totally disingenuous.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 8:03 pmAnd the 50% who don’t just suck Trump’s dick while he shits on them (that’s even assuming all of them wouldn’t take issue with his ignorance and that’s not true) are all fat DEI lesbos, right?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:59 pmTo be fair to myself. I am often on here more than anyone acknowledging that at the end of the day I largely don't know shit and have to use my own judgment to the best of my abilities. Not surprised that went unnoticed, tbh.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:51 pmNo it’s very relevant actually.Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:46 pmAnecdotal and irrelevant. But I know one.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:44 pmHow many LAFD firefighters do you know personally?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:42 pmAgree to disagree.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:41 pmYou’re being incredibly disrespectful and you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:40 pmYou really think the vast majority of firemen do not support Trump. Do you really genuinely believe it's even close? It's not.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:38 pmWhy are you pretending to know what thousands of firefighters think to try to score online political points?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:48 pmIf we're gonna go that route I'm entirely certain that if you ask every fireman that isn't an put of shape DEI lesbo what they thought of Trump and what he said, 99.9% would agree with him.Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:44 pm I'm sure the firemen adore Trump calling efforts incompetent and questioning what's wrong with them, why can't they just put out these easy fires.
You really think his comments were aimed toward firemen? You genuinely believe that?
I know two. One is a Democrat, one is a probably slightly right leaning centrist, more Libertarian. They’re both white guys, not “out of shape DEI lesbos”. Neither like Trump. Obviously I know the only ones in LAFD, right?
Occasionally it might be good for you to have the humility to acknowledge you don’t know what you’re talking about instead of trying to win a stupid argument all the time.
Anyway, here's this. The IAFF polled around 300,000 of their union firefighters to see who they preferred in 2016. The results are overwhelming. I doubt they shifted for Kamala.
Not that it really matters who they like or don't like. The idiots in California are fully responsible for not taking ANY preventative measures to ensure a wildfire doesn't get so out of hand that the entire city is gone. But here we are. And we're in this thread whining about Trump again.
Also, no. Not all who voted against Trump are fat DEI lesbos, however, all fat DEI lesbos likely did not check the Trump box (imo).![]()
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: California Burning
Nah. I would probably agree with that.Headhunter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 8:12 pm Actually I would guarantee a much higher percentage of lesbian firefighters would vote for Trump than the general population of lesbians. Through my work I have met plenty of gay people in law enforcement, most of them lesbians. It’s probably pretty close to 50/50, maybe 60/40 blue with their politics. There is really a lot more nuance to this stuff than you believe.


- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 10733
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: California Burning
I ain't twisting jackola. No idea how to put them out. Trump does. Where is it?Jason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 8:10 pmIf the rumors are true, Gavin is already working with developers to design apartments where all the beautiful homes are currently ashes. So there's that. If that is indeed true, I think that any outrage should be directed that way as opposed to twisting words of a statement from another guy who bears zero responsibility and actually laid the blueprint of preventative measures that were not taken by Gavin or any other politician in L.A.Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 8:07 pm You know where the Don can help? Use all of his real estate "expertise" to cut the bullshit here. The Rebuild is gonna take longer than all of our lives. Here you need Permit to remove debris. Permit to start construction. Engineering approval for new structure. HOA approval for structure. Environmental study. City/county approval for new structure. Permit for the homeless to stay in your home. Study to make sure no ants will be harmed during construction. Permit for the toxins from Newsom's hair gel. It's fucking redick. The Don can help that, yeah no?

- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11143
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: California Burning
I don't know what's holding them down.Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:54 amI have three family members who live in SoCal. All three are multi millionaires and they are stuck in Cali.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:11 am Unless you're wealthy, you can easily be stuck here.
Re: California Burning
Established careers/businesses, family, friends, established networks, age, lack of desire to move/start over.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:41 pmI don't know what's holding them down.Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:54 amI have three family members who live in SoCal. All three are multi millionaires and they are stuck in Cali.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:11 am Unless you're wealthy, you can easily be stuck here.
There are a tone of reasons someone might choose not to relocate despite having the financial resources to do so. I.E. ...One of my cousins out there wont move because she does not want to live far away from her children.
THE CLOSEST WE WILL EVER GET TO ROCK VS. ROMAN


- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11143
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: California Burning
Ah, that's the big one right there. They're not stuck if they have no desire to get out. My perception of being stuck here is clearly very different lol.Lazerus wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:39 amEstablished careers/businesses, family, friends, established networks, age, lack of desire to move/start over.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:41 pmI don't know what's holding them down.Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:54 amI have three family members who live in SoCal. All three are multi millionaires and they are stuck in Cali.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:11 am Unless you're wealthy, you can easily be stuck here.
There are a tone of reasons someone might choose not to relocate despite having the financial resources to do so. I.E. ...One of my cousins out there wont move because she does not want to live far away from her children.
Re: California Burning
She would love to move but because her children are there (and her grandkids) she can't. She doesn't want to do the long distance thing with her family so therefore she is stuck. The other ones are stuck (at least for now) their for their careers. It's not for lack of desire to leave.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:46 amAh, that's the big one right there. They're not stuck if they have no desire to get out. My perception of being stuck here is clearly very different lol.Lazerus wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:39 amEstablished careers/businesses, family, friends, established networks, age, lack of desire to move/start over.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:41 pmI don't know what's holding them down.Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:54 amI have three family members who live in SoCal. All three are multi millionaires and they are stuck in Cali.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:11 am Unless you're wealthy, you can easily be stuck here.
There are a tone of reasons someone might choose not to relocate despite having the financial resources to do so. I.E. ...One of my cousins out there wont move because she does not want to live far away from her children.
it seems you were offended by my comments. That was not the intention here.
THE CLOSEST WE WILL EVER GET TO ROCK VS. ROMAN


- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 11143
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: California Burning
I also think the word "easily" is missed in my first comment. You're listing a lot of stuff that makes it complicated, hard. There are plenty of reasons not to actually move, but the easiest, most wide-spread reason is cost. This state is a vampire on finances.Lazerus wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 9:06 amShe would love to move but because her children are there (and her grandkids) she can't. She doesn't want to do the long distance thing with her family so therefore she is stuck. The other ones are stuck (at least for now) their for their careers. It's not for lack of desire to leave.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:46 amAh, that's the big one right there. They're not stuck if they have no desire to get out. My perception of being stuck here is clearly very different lol.Lazerus wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:39 amEstablished careers/businesses, family, friends, established networks, age, lack of desire to move/start over.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:41 pmI don't know what's holding them down.Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:54 amI have three family members who live in SoCal. All three are multi millionaires and they are stuck in Cali.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:11 am Unless you're wealthy, you can easily be stuck here.
There are a tone of reasons someone might choose not to relocate despite having the financial resources to do so. I.E. ...One of my cousins out there wont move because she does not want to live far away from her children.
it seems you were offended by my comments. That was not the intention here.
Re: California Burning
To be fair, You implied in your first comment that being wealthy makes it easy to move and I wanted to point out that's not always the case when other variables come into play. When you responded with "I don't know what's holding them down" I felt that you were offended and again that wasn't my intention here Darren. I was simply wanting to engage in a conversation but perhaps I approached it wrong from the beginning or maybe I took your comment out of context? idk. But it seemed like you took offense and if you did then my bad.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 9:14 amI also think the word "easily" is missed in my first comment. You're listing a lot of stuff that makes it complicated, hard. There are plenty of reasons not to actually move, but the easiest, most wide-spread reason is cost. This state is a vampire on finances.Lazerus wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 9:06 amShe would love to move but because her children are there (and her grandkids) she can't. She doesn't want to do the long distance thing with her family so therefore she is stuck. The other ones are stuck (at least for now) their for their careers. It's not for lack of desire to leave.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:46 amAh, that's the big one right there. They're not stuck if they have no desire to get out. My perception of being stuck here is clearly very different lol.Lazerus wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:39 amEstablished careers/businesses, family, friends, established networks, age, lack of desire to move/start over.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:41 pmI don't know what's holding them down.Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:54 amI have three family members who live in SoCal. All three are multi millionaires and they are stuck in Cali.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:11 am Unless you're wealthy, you can easily be stuck here.
There are a tone of reasons someone might choose not to relocate despite having the financial resources to do so. I.E. ...One of my cousins out there wont move because she does not want to live far away from her children.
it seems you were offended by my comments. That was not the intention here.
THE CLOSEST WE WILL EVER GET TO ROCK VS. ROMAN


- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 10733
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: California Burning
https://www.aol.com/california-official ... 00737.htmlJason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:51 pmHave those 60 firetrucks from Oregon passed the emissions testing in San Gaysisco yet?Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:48 pm I haven't seen anything he would do right now. I've seen shoulda coulda woulda of prior like no illegals etc.
Right wing nut jobs fabricating shit and you run with it straight out the stadium, never could have predicated that.


Re: California Burning
If none of the variables came into play and you were desperate to leave California but live like the vast majority who are paycheck to paycheck, it is basically impossible to leave. The state ups the cost to make it more difficult to leave. They know people are basically fleeing from California like it's the plague and they can't afford it.Lazerus wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 9:27 amTo be fair, You implied in your first comment that being wealthy makes it easy to move and I wanted to point out that's not always the case when other variables come into play. When you responded with "I don't know what's holding them down" I felt that you were offended and again that wasn't my intention here Darren. I was simply wanting to engage in a conversation but perhaps I approached it wrong from the beginning or maybe I took your comment out of context? idk. But it seemed like you took offense and if you did then my bad.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 9:14 amI also think the word "easily" is missed in my first comment. You're listing a lot of stuff that makes it complicated, hard. There are plenty of reasons not to actually move, but the easiest, most wide-spread reason is cost. This state is a vampire on finances.Lazerus wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 9:06 amShe would love to move but because her children are there (and her grandkids) she can't. She doesn't want to do the long distance thing with her family so therefore she is stuck. The other ones are stuck (at least for now) their for their careers. It's not for lack of desire to leave.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:46 amAh, that's the big one right there. They're not stuck if they have no desire to get out. My perception of being stuck here is clearly very different lol.Lazerus wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:39 amEstablished careers/businesses, family, friends, established networks, age, lack of desire to move/start over.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:41 pmI don't know what's holding them down.Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:54 amI have three family members who live in SoCal. All three are multi millionaires and they are stuck in Cali.DancesWithWerewolves wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:11 am Unless you're wealthy, you can easily be stuck here.
There are a tone of reasons someone might choose not to relocate despite having the financial resources to do so. I.E. ...One of my cousins out there wont move because she does not want to live far away from her children.
it seems you were offended by my comments. That was not the intention here.


Re: California Burning
They were stopped for inspection in the middle of a world renowned emergency. Nobody said they were denied access or turned away like that article says. Emissions testing is apparently what didn't happen, rather an inspection to see if the vehicles are working and safe for the road? That's literally the job of the driver. Lmao. Still retarded, however you want to look at it.Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:24 amhttps://www.aol.com/california-official ... 00737.htmlJason wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:51 pmHave those 60 firetrucks from Oregon passed the emissions testing in San Gaysisco yet?Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:48 pm I haven't seen anything he would do right now. I've seen shoulda coulda woulda of prior like no illegals etc.
Right wing nut jobs fabricating shit and you run with it straight out the stadium, never could have predicated that.![]()
Emission inspection would've been the chef's kiss on the retardation of California.


- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 10733
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: California Burning
It's all the equipment. As it stated, fire trucks and all the hoses and shit on them and the cargo they brought typically do not travel hundreds of miles. So before letting them just rip when they could be unsafe, they spent 15 minutes to have shit checked out. Such retards.

Re: California Burning
They have an entire team of firefighters on each vehicle that is responsible for set equipment regardless of miles traveled. I drove heavy vehicles for 8 years as a class A driver. Drove through inspection scales every day and once in my life did they ever inspect my vehicle for safety. Takes about 45 minutes for each vehicle. Probably longer for a firetruck since they have hoses and compartments. But this is the federal government inspecting federal workers inspecting equipment. So they tend to get in their own way and exacerbate things.Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 1:00 pm It's all the equipment. As it stated, fire trucks and all the hoses and shit on them and the cargo they brought typically do not travel hundreds of miles. So before letting them just rip when they could be unsafe, they spent 15 minutes to have shit checked out. Such retards.
Have at it, inspector gadget.


- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 10733
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: California Burning
I don't trust Oregon, what have they ever done that's good? There might have been a stowaway illegal in one of the compartments, come here just to light up some shit. I'm damn glad they looked, could have stopped a potential arsonist, aren't you? I am so damn glad.
