HorrorMovieFans.com

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Oh man.....I remember when the conservatives had the monopoly on being "moral". Seems they don't give a shit like the rest of us!

*High fives own self.

Most conservatives believe in a trial before the execution. That appears to be the difference.

If they are on their side, of course. I'm not saying libs are better. Think about Clinton. He had a consensual blowjob from a person who sought him out. He lied. Conservatives heads expoloded.

showa58taro wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

Foo wrote:

showa58taro wrote:

Reign in Blood wrote:

showa58taro wrote:https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/ ... h-is-lying

Yup. He is lying.

Yeah, he did. Did Ford?

Of course as someone pointed out when a similar comment was made on Twitter, we aren’t confirming Ford for a lifetime position. He on the other hand appears to be a judge who is not measured or calm, is not impartial and non-partisan, and is not honest. That’s not a great set of characteristics for a judge.

You do realize he has been a judge on the second highest federal court for many years, and has an exceptional record, often cited by the Supreme Court itself? He is universally respected, with only those differing with him based upon political hot topics like gun control, abortion, etc.

No reason to destroy the man because he was nominated for his good work and doesn't think how you think.

I mean none of that is true but other than that, sure.

Which part? Kav has been on the second highest federal court. Foo was right about that.

My opinion.....this guy could be the one that helps turn over Roe vs Wade. This is why libs, like myself, are shitting their pants. They cater to the evangelicals. Trump is totally doing the same. Rape will not be considered grounds for abortion. They think it's still Gods work.

None was the wrong word. He doesn’t have an exceptional record or bring universally respected or frequently cited.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/3 ... reme-court

The Supreme Court has adopted his position on various matters at least 11 times.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Oh man.....I remember when the conservatives had the monopoly on being "moral". Seems they don't give a shit like the rest of us!

*High fives own self.

Most conservatives believe in a trial before the execution. That appears to be the difference.

If they are on their side, of course. I'm not saying libs are better. Think about Clinton. He had a consensual blowjob from a person who sought him out. He lied. Conservatives heads expoloded.

Let's start with the acknowledgement that the blow job happened, as there was actual evidence, not just a story that one person tells and everyone else she says was there do not concur with. Huge difference.

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Oh man.....I remember when the conservatives had the monopoly on being "moral". Seems they don't give a shit like the rest of us!

*High fives own self.

Most conservatives believe in a trial before the execution. That appears to be the difference.

If they are on their side, of course. I'm not saying libs are better. Think about Clinton. He had a consensual blowjob from a person who sought him out. He lied. Conservatives heads expoloded.

Let's start with the acknowledgement that the blow job happened, as there was actual evidence, not just a story that one person tells and everyone else she says was there do not concur with. Huge difference.

But they did the same as libs are doing now. They all "knew" he was guilty. I agree somewhat. Guilty before innocence. That's dangerous. But it doesn't just happen on one side.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Oh man.....I remember when the conservatives had the monopoly on being "moral". Seems they don't give a shit like the rest of us!

*High fives own self.

Most conservatives believe in a trial before the execution. That appears to be the difference.

If they are on their side, of course. I'm not saying libs are better. Think about Clinton. He had a consensual blowjob from a person who sought him out. He lied. Conservatives heads expoloded.

Let's start with the acknowledgement that the blow job happened, as there was actual evidence, not just a story that one person tells and everyone else she says was there do not concur with. Huge difference.

But they did the same as libs are doing now. They all "knew" he was guilty. I agree somewhat. Guilty before innocence. That's dangerous. But it doesn't just happen on one side.

They had his cum on a dress. He was outright caught in a lie, so yes, they knew he was guilty of lying.

Also, they were caught in a lie about Whitewater, which is what broadened that investigation. It was not like a he said, she said, it was literally conflicting documents.

And let's be 100% real for a minute, liberals keep losing on things like the Supreme Court nominations because they keep electing people based on identity politics rather than qualifications.

Harris and Booker look like absolute idiots in comparison to Grassley and Graham.

As a liberal, are you proud of them representing your interests?

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Oh man.....I remember when the conservatives had the monopoly on being "moral". Seems they don't give a shit like the rest of us!

*High fives own self.

Most conservatives believe in a trial before the execution. That appears to be the difference.

If they are on their side, of course. I'm not saying libs are better. Think about Clinton. He had a consensual blowjob from a person who sought him out. He lied. Conservatives heads expoloded.

Let's start with the acknowledgement that the blow job happened, as there was actual evidence, not just a story that one person tells and everyone else she says was there do not concur with. Huge difference.

But they did the same as libs are doing now. They all "knew" he was guilty. I agree somewhat. Guilty before innocence. That's dangerous. But it doesn't just happen on one side.

They had his cum on a dress. He was outright caught in a lie, so yes, they knew he was guilty of lying.

Also, they were caught in a lie about Whitewater, which is what broadened that investigation. It was not like a he said, she said, it was literally conflicting documents.

They knew before? (Only libs do that!). A consensual blowjob? That is not rape. If anything, the Christians should have applauded Hillary for staying married and standing by her man. I mean , they started dating in what.....the late 60s? Early 70s?

Foo wrote:And let's be 100% real for a minute, liberals keep losing on things like the Supreme Court nominations because they keep electing people based on identity politics rather than qualifications.

Harris and Booker look like absolute idiots in comparison to Grassley and Graham.

As a liberal, are you proud of them representing your interests?

No. As a conservative, are you proud of what the conservatives did to block Merrick? I think we both are under represented.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Oh man.....I remember when the conservatives had the monopoly on being "moral". Seems they don't give a shit like the rest of us!

*High fives own self.

Most conservatives believe in a trial before the execution. That appears to be the difference.

If they are on their side, of course. I'm not saying libs are better. Think about Clinton. He had a consensual blowjob from a person who sought him out. He lied. Conservatives heads expoloded.

Let's start with the acknowledgement that the blow job happened, as there was actual evidence, not just a story that one person tells and everyone else she says was there do not concur with. Huge difference.

But they did the same as libs are doing now. They all "knew" he was guilty. I agree somewhat. Guilty before innocence. That's dangerous. But it doesn't just happen on one side.

They had his cum on a dress. He was outright caught in a lie, so yes, they knew he was guilty of lying.

Also, they were caught in a lie about Whitewater, which is what broadened that investigation. It was not like a he said, she said, it was literally conflicting documents.

They knew before? (Only libs do that!). A consensual blowjob? That is not rape. If anything, the Christians should have applauded Hillary for staying married and standing by her man. I mean , they started dating in what.....the late 60s? Early 70s?

Uh, do you understand the power dynamic at play there? The most powerful man in the world, and a married man, getting sexual favors from an intern is not only a potential abuse of her, but is rife for all sorts of extortion. What would happen if Monica had wanted a much better job she was not qualified for? Think those blowjobs become a factor? You know the answer.

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Oh man.....I remember when the conservatives had the monopoly on being "moral". Seems they don't give a shit like the rest of us!

*High fives own self.

Most conservatives believe in a trial before the execution. That appears to be the difference.

If they are on their side, of course. I'm not saying libs are better. Think about Clinton. He had a consensual blowjob from a person who sought him out. He lied. Conservatives heads expoloded.

Let's start with the acknowledgement that the blow job happened, as there was actual evidence, not just a story that one person tells and everyone else she says was there do not concur with. Huge difference.

But they did the same as libs are doing now. They all "knew" he was guilty. I agree somewhat. Guilty before innocence. That's dangerous. But it doesn't just happen on one side.

They had his cum on a dress. He was outright caught in a lie, so yes, they knew he was guilty of lying.

Also, they were caught in a lie about Whitewater, which is what broadened that investigation. It was not like a he said, she said, it was literally conflicting documents.

They knew before? (Only libs do that!). A consensual blowjob? That is not rape. If anything, the Christians should have applauded Hillary for staying married and standing by her man. I mean , they started dating in what.....the late 60s? Early 70s?

Uh, do you understand the power dynamic at play there? The most powerful man in the world, and a married man, getting sexual favors from an intern is not only a potential abuse of her, but is rife for all sorts of extortion. What would happen if Monica had wanted a much better job she was not qualified for? Think those blowjobs become a factor? You know the answer.

Did he just grab her by the pussy? Would that have been better? Paying off a chick who has had a thousand dicks cum in her face is better? While his wife was at home raising a newborn? See where I am getting at?

Foo....should Hillary have stayed with Bill or get a divorce? And if you think she should have stayed with him, do ya think she was doing the right thing? Morally.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:And let's be 100% real for a minute, liberals keep losing on things like the Supreme Court nominations because they keep electing people based on identity politics rather than qualifications.

Harris and Booker look like absolute idiots in comparison to Grassley and Graham.

As a liberal, are you proud of them representing your interests?

No. As a conservative, are you proud of what the conservatives did to block Merrick? I think we both are under represented.

I am talking about intellect. Yes, I am proud of the intellect of top conservatives. Don't always agree with them, but people in the leadership like Graham, Ryan, Grassley, and McConnell are certainly of high level intellect.

He wasn't going to get the votes anyway.

And I would like to point out that Lindsay Graham, who had that awesome takedown of the Dems at the end of the hearing, voted to confirm BOTH of Obama's Supreme Court nominees, and BOTH of the Obama Supreme Court nominees who made it out of committee had multiple Republican votes.

Compare this to Democrats, who have hive mind and decided to block Kavanaugh from the moment he was announced, and before any of these goofy allegations occurred.

Jmac Attack wrote:Foo....should Hillary have stayed with Bill or get a divorce? And if you think she should have stayed with him, do ya think she was doing the right thing? Morally.

Oh good lord, are we pretending they have an actual relationship that is not anything more than a business deal? Hillary is a lesbian and Bill will fuck anything that isn't Hillary.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Oh man.....I remember when the conservatives had the monopoly on being "moral". Seems they don't give a shit like the rest of us!

*High fives own self.

Most conservatives believe in a trial before the execution. That appears to be the difference.

If they are on their side, of course. I'm not saying libs are better. Think about Clinton. He had a consensual blowjob from a person who sought him out. He lied. Conservatives heads expoloded.

Let's start with the acknowledgement that the blow job happened, as there was actual evidence, not just a story that one person tells and everyone else she says was there do not concur with. Huge difference.

But they did the same as libs are doing now. They all "knew" he was guilty. I agree somewhat. Guilty before innocence. That's dangerous. But it doesn't just happen on one side.

They had his cum on a dress. He was outright caught in a lie, so yes, they knew he was guilty of lying.

Also, they were caught in a lie about Whitewater, which is what broadened that investigation. It was not like a he said, she said, it was literally conflicting documents.

They knew before? (Only libs do that!). A consensual blowjob? That is not rape. If anything, the Christians should have applauded Hillary for staying married and standing by her man. I mean , they started dating in what.....the late 60s? Early 70s?

Uh, do you understand the power dynamic at play there? The most powerful man in the world, and a married man, getting sexual favors from an intern is not only a potential abuse of her, but is rife for all sorts of extortion. What would happen if Monica had wanted a much better job she was not qualified for? Think those blowjobs become a factor? You know the answer.

Did he just grab her by the pussy? Would that have been better? Paying off a chick who has had a thousand dicks cum in her face is better? While his wife was at home raising a newborn? See where I am getting at?

No, I don't. Because first he took advantage of an intern (major no-no in any setting), and then he was completely vulnerable to all sorts of extortion as a result.

Trump was not president at the time, and he was still extorted for huge sums of money. Imagine what Stormy would have demanded if he was cheating as president? Ambassador Stormy?

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:And let's be 100% real for a minute, liberals keep losing on things like the Supreme Court nominations because they keep electing people based on identity politics rather than qualifications.

Harris and Booker look like absolute idiots in comparison to Grassley and Graham.

As a liberal, are you proud of them representing your interests?

No. As a conservative, are you proud of what the conservatives did to block Merrick? I think we both are under represented.

I am talking about intellect. Yes, I am proud of the intellect of top conservatives. Don't always agree with them, but people in the leadership like Graham, Ryan, Grassley, and McConnell are certainly of high level intellect.

He wasn't going to get the votes anyway.

Paul Ryan? Who voted for an older retirement age, but then retired before the age of 50? Lol. This guy wasn't slinging coal or doing construction.

I get what you're saying though. I'm just saying that I am sick of just two sides being the option. I would love for you to come out firing against Republicans like you do Dems. Do you believe in the deep state and all that shit? If so....why? And don't forget, those Muslim countries have enacted very conservative laws. But, you're more concerned about chicks with dicks using bathrooms, and most have them have been doing all along. When it becomes law......Oh shit! What gives? Seriously and honestly trying to figure you out. I'm pretty hard to understand myself.

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Foo....should Hillary have stayed with Bill or get a divorce? And if you think she should have stayed with him, do ya think she was doing the right thing? Morally.

Oh good lord, are we pretending they have an actual relationship that is not anything more than a business deal? Hillary is a lesbian and Bill will fuck anything that isn't Hillary.

Although funny and I did chuckle. Do you have proof you dirty liberal! Lmao

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Oh man.....I remember when the conservatives had the monopoly on being "moral". Seems they don't give a shit like the rest of us!

*High fives own self.

Most conservatives believe in a trial before the execution. That appears to be the difference.

If they are on their side, of course. I'm not saying libs are better. Think about Clinton. He had a consensual blowjob from a person who sought him out. He lied. Conservatives heads expoloded.

Let's start with the acknowledgement that the blow job happened, as there was actual evidence, not just a story that one person tells and everyone else she says was there do not concur with. Huge difference.

But they did the same as libs are doing now. They all "knew" he was guilty. I agree somewhat. Guilty before innocence. That's dangerous. But it doesn't just happen on one side.

They had his cum on a dress. He was outright caught in a lie, so yes, they knew he was guilty of lying.

Also, they were caught in a lie about Whitewater, which is what broadened that investigation. It was not like a he said, she said, it was literally conflicting documents.

They knew before? (Only libs do that!). A consensual blowjob? That is not rape. If anything, the Christians should have applauded Hillary for staying married and standing by her man. I mean , they started dating in what.....the late 60s? Early 70s?

Uh, do you understand the power dynamic at play there? The most powerful man in the world, and a married man, getting sexual favors from an intern is not only a potential abuse of her, but is rife for all sorts of extortion. What would happen if Monica had wanted a much better job she was not qualified for? Think those blowjobs become a factor? You know the answer.

Did he just grab her by the pussy? Would that have been better? Paying off a chick who has had a thousand dicks cum in her face is better? While his wife was at home raising a newborn? See where I am getting at?

No, I don't. Because first he took advantage of an intern (major no-no in any setting), and then he was completely vulnerable to all sorts of extortion as a result.

Trump was not president at the time, and he was still extorted for huge sums of money. Imagine what Stormy would have demanded if he was cheating as president? Ambassador Stormy?

You don't think Trump would stoop that low? But Bill did? Both are scum, btw.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:And let's be 100% real for a minute, liberals keep losing on things like the Supreme Court nominations because they keep electing people based on identity politics rather than qualifications.

Harris and Booker look like absolute idiots in comparison to Grassley and Graham.

As a liberal, are you proud of them representing your interests?

No. As a conservative, are you proud of what the conservatives did to block Merrick? I think we both are under represented.

I am talking about intellect. Yes, I am proud of the intellect of top conservatives. Don't always agree with them, but people in the leadership like Graham, Ryan, Grassley, and McConnell are certainly of high level intellect.

He wasn't going to get the votes anyway.

Paul Ryan? Who voted for an older retirement age, but then retired before the age of 50? Lol. This guy wasn't slinging coal or doing construction.

I get what you're saying though. I'm just saying that I am sick of just two sides being the option. I would love for you to come out firing against Republicans like you do Dems. Do you believe in the deep state and all that shit? If so....why? And don't forget, those Muslim countries have enacted very conservative laws. But, you're more concerned about chicks with dicks using bathrooms, and most have them have been doing all along. When it becomes law......Oh shit! What gives? Seriously and honestly trying to figure you out. I'm pretty hard to understand myself.

Uh, a multi-term member of Congress who rose all the way to Speaker is retiring at a young age, and you cite this as lack of intellect?

And yes, retirement age needs to be raised, as people are living longer. This is not rocket science. You will be working until the day you drop dead, whether it is raised or not. If it is raised, it least it will be there for you.

Ask me a question and I will tell no lies. I care about the environment we are creating for kids and I care about being allowed to thrive. The rest is pretty much noise to me. I am not hard to figure out, neither are you.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:Oh man.....I remember when the conservatives had the monopoly on being "moral". Seems they don't give a shit like the rest of us!

*High fives own self.

Most conservatives believe in a trial before the execution. That appears to be the difference.

If they are on their side, of course. I'm not saying libs are better. Think about Clinton. He had a consensual blowjob from a person who sought him out. He lied. Conservatives heads expoloded.

Let's start with the acknowledgement that the blow job happened, as there was actual evidence, not just a story that one person tells and everyone else she says was there do not concur with. Huge difference.

But they did the same as libs are doing now. They all "knew" he was guilty. I agree somewhat. Guilty before innocence. That's dangerous. But it doesn't just happen on one side.

They had his cum on a dress. He was outright caught in a lie, so yes, they knew he was guilty of lying.

Also, they were caught in a lie about Whitewater, which is what broadened that investigation. It was not like a he said, she said, it was literally conflicting documents.

They knew before? (Only libs do that!). A consensual blowjob? That is not rape. If anything, the Christians should have applauded Hillary for staying married and standing by her man. I mean , they started dating in what.....the late 60s? Early 70s?

Uh, do you understand the power dynamic at play there? The most powerful man in the world, and a married man, getting sexual favors from an intern is not only a potential abuse of her, but is rife for all sorts of extortion. What would happen if Monica had wanted a much better job she was not qualified for? Think those blowjobs become a factor? You know the answer.

Did he just grab her by the pussy? Would that have been better? Paying off a chick who has had a thousand dicks cum in her face is better? While his wife was at home raising a newborn? See where I am getting at?

No, I don't. Because first he took advantage of an intern (major no-no in any setting), and then he was completely vulnerable to all sorts of extortion as a result.

Trump was not president at the time, and he was still extorted for huge sums of money. Imagine what Stormy would have demanded if he was cheating as president? Ambassador Stormy?

You don't think Trump would stoop that low? But Bill did? Both are scum, btw.

Trump seems to like exceptional women, not dumpy interns. And I think Trump would legit kill himself before being stuck with Hillary. I think sex was definitely a weakness for both men. I also think the Trump of today is long past his years of being a dog and probably can;t even get an erection. Kinda like Clinton today is not Clinton of 20 years ago.

Trump is no moral leader. He is a economic policy and security guy, and by most measures, he has been very good at both as president.