President Donald J. Trump Inauguration Celebration

[Reign in Blood]

From 1980-2004, the national perception of left wing politics was extremely negative. The window was closed until the financial crisis. By then the Democrats had made a pretty significant shift to the right.

How long do you predict the MAGA Era will last and what do you think might follow it?

I don’t know how much legs MAGA specifically will have, but I the Republicans will be a populist party for the foreseeable future because of it. And I think the Democrat platform will increasingly be about rejecting populism and become more of an “in group” for an educated culturally liberal class of people. I expect they will move to the right on immigration.

So what you're saying is the Dems ain't gonna win jack shit in the foreseeable future.

They will but only because of GOP incompetence. That’s the only reason they’ve won anything recently.

Alright. Only reason liberals exist is for when GOP trips over their own dicks. Makes a lot of sense really.

[Jason]

It keeps getting interesting!

[Jason]

[zombie]

i do hope that all of this interest will mean that we expect governments going forward to be more open and transparent about where tax payer dollars are going.

[Jason]

i do hope that all of this interest will mean that we expect governments going forward to be more open and transparent about where tax payer dollars are going.

Yes! That's what I've always expected

[zombie]

and looks like the "leak" about politico funding may have been misinformation spread by all the prominent republican leaders. curious what other leaks are also misinformation.

[zombie]

i do hope that all of this interest will mean that we expect governments going forward to be more open and transparent about where tax payer dollars are going.

Yes! That's what I've always expected

something we can agree on! but it won't happen.

[Jason]

and looks like the "leak" about politico funding may have been misinformation spread by all the prominent republican leaders. curious what other leaks are also misinformation.

237 subscriptions to Politico at 34,599 dollars each is not misinfo. lol

[zombie]

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/06/busi ... iracy.html

Agencies under the Trump administration have also paid for subscriptions, according to the records. In 2017, for example, the Executive Office of the President set aside $97,720 for a payment to Politico.

https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_ ... NE-_-NONE-

"start date: 2017...Executive Office of the President"



so, looks like it may just be a high price for subscriptions for some kind of service. i want more info. give me more info.

[Reign in Blood]

Who the fuck is saying yes to that subscription?! You assholes link me to the NY or LA or Tranny times on here and they ask for .99 cents and I immediately bounce. Who the fuck.

[Tiggnutz]

Who the fuck is saying yes to that subscription?! You assholes link me to the NY or LA or Tranny times on here and they ask for .99 cents and I immediately bounce. Who the fuck.

It's the same as buying Hunter Biden art. Money laundering

[zombie]

red or blue, politicians lie and misinform. we need to be more critical of all the news we consume.

[Jason]

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/06/busi ... iracy.html

Agencies under the Trump administration have also paid for subscriptions, according to the records. In 2017, for example, the Executive Office of the President set aside $97,720 for a payment to Politico.

https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_ ... NE-_-NONE-

"start date: 2017...Executive Office of the President"



so, looks like it may just be a high price for subscriptions for some kind of service. i want more info. give me more info.

Ironically, I can't continue reading the link without either subscribing to their newsletter or accepting NYT cookies. Lmao.

Biased NYT is citing that Trump was involved in politico getting 8 million dollars starting in 2024?

Sounds like desperate reaching from a dying news agency to me. Have you seen the heavily edited Kamala interview 60 Minutes were forced to release? Lmao. They'll lie about anything at this point.

[zombie]

Ironically, I can't continue reading the link without either subscribing to their newsletter or accepting NYT cookies. Lmao.

Biased NYT is citing that Trump was involved in politico getting 8 million dollars starting in 2024?

Sounds like desperate reaching from a dying news agency to me. Have you seen the heavily edited Kamala interview they were forced to release? Lmao.

i have heard that about kamala harris. i believe that reign linked something refuting it on yahoo?

my point is not to cover for democrats. it is to not just trust republicans. be critical of politicians no matter how you feel about them. kamala harris is a politician. i am sure, without doubt, that she has lied or misinformed as well. just as trump has. musk has. pelosi has. biden has. all of them have media sources in their pockets. all of them suck.

but they can also be correct, sometimes. prove me wrong. don't just dismiss a source because you don't like what it says.

[Jason]

Ironically, I can't continue reading the link without either subscribing to their newsletter or accepting NYT cookies. Lmao.

Biased NYT is citing that Trump was involved in politico getting 8 million dollars starting in 2024?

Sounds like desperate reaching from a dying news agency to me. Have you seen the heavily edited Kamala interview they were forced to release? Lmao.

i have heard that about kamala harris. i believe that reign linked something refuting it on yahoo?

my point is not to cover for democrats. it is to not just trust republicans. be critical of politicians no matter how you feel about them. kamala harris is a politician. i am sure, without doubt, that she has lied or misinformed as well. just as trump has. musk has. pelosi has. biden has. all of them have media sources in their pockets. all of them suck.

but they can also be correct, sometimes. prove me wrong. don't just dismiss a source because you don't like what it says.

I can't read what it says. Lol.

Honestly, I expected more Republican corruption to be seen in this but it's all democrats. I guess the most surprising thing is there are less corrupt Republicans than I expected. So far!

[Jigsaw]

My aunt actually got me a NYT subscription for my birthday.

It was a nice thing to do, but NYT is liberal status quo propaganda who posted multiple anti-Jill Stein articles - one, I remember, was titled "Jill Stein won't drop out, no matter who asks her" - so I've not once used it, nor read a thing on there.

Pretty sure they also covered up Israel's actions during their genocide, so no interest at all in their material.

[Jason]

Get this absolute piece of shit out of politics.

[zombie]

Ironically, I can't continue reading the link without either subscribing to their newsletter or accepting NYT cookies. Lmao.

Biased NYT is citing that Trump was involved in politico getting 8 million dollars starting in 2024?

Sounds like desperate reaching from a dying news agency to me. Have you seen the heavily edited Kamala interview they were forced to release? Lmao.

i have heard that about kamala harris. i believe that reign linked something refuting it on yahoo?

my point is not to cover for democrats. it is to not just trust republicans. be critical of politicians no matter how you feel about them. kamala harris is a politician. i am sure, without doubt, that she has lied or misinformed as well. just as trump has. musk has. pelosi has. biden has. all of them have media sources in their pockets. all of them suck.

but they can also be correct, sometimes. prove me wrong. don't just dismiss a source because you don't like what it says.

I can't read what it says. Lol.

Honestly, I expected more Republican corruption to be seen in this but it's all democrats. I guess the most surprising thing is there are less corrupt Republicans than I expected. So far!

basically it says that the presidential office received politico subscription service in 2017 for a large amount of money, with a link to us spending also provided in my post.

this was to own the libs. it was not about actual transparency. but own the libs, they are certainly doing.

[Jason]

Ironically, I can't continue reading the link without either subscribing to their newsletter or accepting NYT cookies. Lmao.

Biased NYT is citing that Trump was involved in politico getting 8 million dollars starting in 2024?

Sounds like desperate reaching from a dying news agency to me. Have you seen the heavily edited Kamala interview they were forced to release? Lmao.

i have heard that about kamala harris. i believe that reign linked something refuting it on yahoo?

my point is not to cover for democrats. it is to not just trust republicans. be critical of politicians no matter how you feel about them. kamala harris is a politician. i am sure, without doubt, that she has lied or misinformed as well. just as trump has. musk has. pelosi has. biden has. all of them have media sources in their pockets. all of them suck.

but they can also be correct, sometimes. prove me wrong. don't just dismiss a source because you don't like what it says.

I can't read what it says. Lol.

Honestly, I expected more Republican corruption to be seen in this but it's all democrats. I guess the most surprising thing is there are less corrupt Republicans than I expected. So far!

basically it says that the presidential office received politico subscription service in 2017 for a large amount of money, with a link to us spending also provided in my post.

this was to own the libs. it was not about actual transparency. but own the libs, they are certainly doing.

There are indications that NYT has received money from politicians also. Interesting that they're the only source for this 2017 stuff. Doesn't add up.

Everyone upset about this is either upset because they can't admit the entire democrat party is entirely littered with corruption or they're upset that Donald Trump is the one exposing it all.

[zombie]

There are indications that NYT has received money from politicians also. Interesting that they're the only source for this 2017 stuff. Doesn't add up.

Everyone upset about this is either upset because they can't admit the entire democrat party is entirely littered with corruption or they're upset that Donald Trump is the one exposing it all.

which one am i? if there is any chance of a third option, what could it possibly be?