HorrorMovieFans.com

Headhunter wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 5:25 pm

Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 5:23 pm

Headhunter wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 2:52 pm

Lazerus wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 2:46 pm

Headhunter wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 2:44 pm From 1980-2004, the national perception of left wing politics was extremely negative. The window was closed until the financial crisis. By then the Democrats had made a pretty significant shift to the right.

How long do you predict the MAGA Era will last and what do you think might follow it?

I don’t know how much legs MAGA specifically will have, but I the Republicans will be a populist party for the foreseeable future because of it. And I think the Democrat platform will increasingly be about rejecting populism and become more of an “in group” for an educated culturally liberal class of people. I expect they will move to the right on immigration.

So what you're saying is the Dems ain't gonna win jack shit in the foreseeable future.

They will but only because of GOP incompetence. That’s the only reason they’ve won anything recently.

zombie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:16 pm i do hope that all of this interest will mean that we expect governments going forward to be more open and transparent about where tax payer dollars are going.

Jason wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:26 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:16 pm i do hope that all of this interest will mean that we expect governments going forward to be more open and transparent about where tax payer dollars are going.

Yes! That's what I've always expected

zombie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:28 pm and looks like the "leak" about politico funding may have been misinformation spread by all the prominent republican leaders. curious what other leaks are also misinformation.

Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:49 pm Who the fuck is saying yes to that subscription?! You assholes link me to the NY or LA or Tranny times on here and they ask for .99 cents and I immediately bounce. Who the fuck.

zombie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:45 pm https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/06/busi ... iracy.html

Agencies under the Trump administration have also paid for subscriptions, according to the records. In 2017, for example, the Executive Office of the President set aside $97,720 for a payment to Politico.

https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_ ... NE-_-NONE-

"start date: 2017...Executive Office of the President"



so, looks like it may just be a high price for subscriptions for some kind of service. i want more info. give me more info.

Jason wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:17 pm
Ironically, I can't continue reading the link without either subscribing to their newsletter or accepting NYT cookies. Lmao.

Biased NYT is citing that Trump was involved in politico getting 8 million dollars starting in 2024?

Sounds like desperate reaching from a dying news agency to me. Have you seen the heavily edited Kamala interview they were forced to release? Lmao.

zombie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:25 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:17 pm
Ironically, I can't continue reading the link without either subscribing to their newsletter or accepting NYT cookies. Lmao.

Biased NYT is citing that Trump was involved in politico getting 8 million dollars starting in 2024?

Sounds like desperate reaching from a dying news agency to me. Have you seen the heavily edited Kamala interview they were forced to release? Lmao.

i have heard that about kamala harris. i believe that reign linked something refuting it on yahoo?

my point is not to cover for democrats. it is to not just trust republicans. be critical of politicians no matter how you feel about them. kamala harris is a politician. i am sure, without doubt, that she has lied or misinformed as well. just as trump has. musk has. pelosi has. biden has. all of them have media sources in their pockets. all of them suck.

but they can also be correct, sometimes. prove me wrong. don't just dismiss a source because you don't like what it says.

Jason wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:31 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:25 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:17 pm
Ironically, I can't continue reading the link without either subscribing to their newsletter or accepting NYT cookies. Lmao.

Biased NYT is citing that Trump was involved in politico getting 8 million dollars starting in 2024?

Sounds like desperate reaching from a dying news agency to me. Have you seen the heavily edited Kamala interview they were forced to release? Lmao.

i have heard that about kamala harris. i believe that reign linked something refuting it on yahoo?

my point is not to cover for democrats. it is to not just trust republicans. be critical of politicians no matter how you feel about them. kamala harris is a politician. i am sure, without doubt, that she has lied or misinformed as well. just as trump has. musk has. pelosi has. biden has. all of them have media sources in their pockets. all of them suck.

but they can also be correct, sometimes. prove me wrong. don't just dismiss a source because you don't like what it says.

I can't read what it says. Lol.

Honestly, I expected more Republican corruption to be seen in this but it's all democrats. I guess the most surprising thing is there are less corrupt Republicans than I expected. So far!

zombie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:37 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:31 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:25 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:17 pm
Ironically, I can't continue reading the link without either subscribing to their newsletter or accepting NYT cookies. Lmao.

Biased NYT is citing that Trump was involved in politico getting 8 million dollars starting in 2024?

Sounds like desperate reaching from a dying news agency to me. Have you seen the heavily edited Kamala interview they were forced to release? Lmao.

i have heard that about kamala harris. i believe that reign linked something refuting it on yahoo?

my point is not to cover for democrats. it is to not just trust republicans. be critical of politicians no matter how you feel about them. kamala harris is a politician. i am sure, without doubt, that she has lied or misinformed as well. just as trump has. musk has. pelosi has. biden has. all of them have media sources in their pockets. all of them suck.

but they can also be correct, sometimes. prove me wrong. don't just dismiss a source because you don't like what it says.

I can't read what it says. Lol.

Honestly, I expected more Republican corruption to be seen in this but it's all democrats. I guess the most surprising thing is there are less corrupt Republicans than I expected. So far!

basically it says that the presidential office received politico subscription service in 2017 for a large amount of money, with a link to us spending also provided in my post.

this was to own the libs. it was not about actual transparency. but own the libs, they are certainly doing.

Jason wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:40 pm

There are indications that NYT has received money from politicians also. Interesting that they're the only source for this 2017 stuff. Doesn't add up.

Everyone upset about this is either upset because they can't admit the entire democrat party is entirely littered with corruption or they're upset that Donald Trump is the one exposing it all.