Re: Random Political Comments
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 10:51 pm
Debate in a nutshell...
For Maniacs, By The Maniacs
https://horrormoviefans.com/forums/
.......says the guy who says polls are the biggest lie lol. To be fair, I got home about an hour ago and I'm still watching the debate.Jason wrote:Polling aggregate from nearly a dozen polls show that 94% of viewers believe Trump won the debate.
He would've won 100% but Biden spent 6 trillion dollars buying off the other 6%. Sad.
The polls I pulled an agg from are just as cooked as the ones that say Biden is up by 14 points.Jmac Attack wrote:.......says the guy who says polls are the biggest lie lol. To be fair, I got home about an hour ago and I'm still watching the debate.Jason wrote:Polling aggregate from nearly a dozen polls show that 94% of viewers believe Trump won the debate.
He would've won 100% but Biden spent 6 trillion dollars buying off the other 6%. Sad.
2020 total votes, or like, to win?Jigsaw wrote:Didn't watch the debate because neither Biden nor Trump are worth shit.
Hawkins 2020.
In Indiana, Stein got about 7,400 write-in votes in 2016 (up from a mere ~700 that she got in 2012), so at least for my state, I'd like to see him get at least 3,500, though ideally more like 4,800, somewhere in that range.Headhunter wrote:2020 total votes, or like, to win?Jigsaw wrote:Didn't watch the debate because neither Biden nor Trump are worth shit.
Hawkins 2020.
Lol you didn’t really think I was serious did youJigsaw wrote:In Indiana, Stein got about 7,400 write-in votes in 2016 (up from a mere ~700 that she got in 2012), so at least for my state, I'd like to see him get at least 3,500, though ideally more like 4,800, somewhere in that range.Headhunter wrote:2020 total votes, or like, to win?Jigsaw wrote:Didn't watch the debate because neither Biden nor Trump are worth shit.
Hawkins 2020.
Either way, I think we can all agree that Hawkins will get more than 2,020 total votes, given that he's on the ballot in a decent amount of states, and has write-in access in most of the one's he's not.
And almost no one who is voting for Hawkins expects him to win, but that's not the point of us voting for him, which I'm sure you know (even if you disagree with).
I'm just hoping every leftist in every state, swing or not, votes for a leftist candidate and not for Biden. That'd be a victory in my eyes. Sadly, I don't think that's happening, as the Democratic Party is holing a gun to the heads of leftists and it'll get them enough votes to likely win, despite Biden being one of the shittiest candidates possible.Headhunter wrote:Lol you didn’t really think I was serious did youJigsaw wrote:In Indiana, Stein got about 7,400 write-in votes in 2016 (up from a mere ~700 that she got in 2012), so at least for my state, I'd like to see him get at least 3,500, though ideally more like 4,800, somewhere in that range.Headhunter wrote:2020 total votes, or like, to win?Jigsaw wrote:Didn't watch the debate because neither Biden nor Trump are worth shit.
Hawkins 2020.
Either way, I think we can all agree that Hawkins will get more than 2,020 total votes, given that he's on the ballot in a decent amount of states, and has write-in access in most of the one's he's not.
And almost no one who is voting for Hawkins expects him to win, but that's not the point of us voting for him, which I'm sure you know (even if you disagree with).
Do what you want. In a macro sense, Indiana is nothing more than 11 electoral votes in Trump’s pocket regardless. There are 8-10 states that actually matter this year, and that ain’t one of them.
If people understood probabilities and how disincentivizing the electoral college is for voters, maybe you’d see that. Too many liberals in Indiana will think their vote matters to do something like that.Jigsaw wrote:I'm just hoping every leftist in every state, swing or not, votes for a leftist candidate and not for Biden. That'd be a victory in my eyes. Sadly, I don't think that's happening, as the Democratic Party is holing a gun to the heads of leftists and it'll get them enough votes to likely win, despite Biden being one of the shittiest candidates possible.Headhunter wrote:Lol you didn’t really think I was serious did youJigsaw wrote:In Indiana, Stein got about 7,400 write-in votes in 2016 (up from a mere ~700 that she got in 2012), so at least for my state, I'd like to see him get at least 3,500, though ideally more like 4,800, somewhere in that range.Headhunter wrote:2020 total votes, or like, to win?Jigsaw wrote:Didn't watch the debate because neither Biden nor Trump are worth shit.
Hawkins 2020.
Either way, I think we can all agree that Hawkins will get more than 2,020 total votes, given that he's on the ballot in a decent amount of states, and has write-in access in most of the one's he's not.
And almost no one who is voting for Hawkins expects him to win, but that's not the point of us voting for him, which I'm sure you know (even if you disagree with).
Do what you want. In a macro sense, Indiana is nothing more than 11 electoral votes in Trump’s pocket regardless. There are 8-10 states that actually matter this year, and that ain’t one of them.
Liberals would be behind Biden anyway, as most are those vote-blue-no-matter-who-and-bully-every-single-Green-Party-voter pieces of shit. It's leftists I'm thinking about, those who wouldn't vote at all or vote third party, being put into a situation in which they don't think they have a choice to vote against both Trump and Biden, when clearly they do.Headhunter wrote:If people understood probabilities and how disincentivizing the electoral college is for voters, maybe you’d see that. Too many liberals in Indiana will think their vote matters to do something like that.Jigsaw wrote:I'm just hoping every leftist in every state, swing or not, votes for a leftist candidate and not for Biden. That'd be a victory in my eyes. Sadly, I don't think that's happening, as the Democratic Party is holing a gun to the heads of leftists and it'll get them enough votes to likely win, despite Biden being one of the shittiest candidates possible.Headhunter wrote:Lol you didn’t really think I was serious did youJigsaw wrote:In Indiana, Stein got about 7,400 write-in votes in 2016 (up from a mere ~700 that she got in 2012), so at least for my state, I'd like to see him get at least 3,500, though ideally more like 4,800, somewhere in that range.Headhunter wrote:2020 total votes, or like, to win?Jigsaw wrote:Didn't watch the debate because neither Biden nor Trump are worth shit.
Hawkins 2020.
Either way, I think we can all agree that Hawkins will get more than 2,020 total votes, given that he's on the ballot in a decent amount of states, and has write-in access in most of the one's he's not.
And almost no one who is voting for Hawkins expects him to win, but that's not the point of us voting for him, which I'm sure you know (even if you disagree with).
Do what you want. In a macro sense, Indiana is nothing more than 11 electoral votes in Trump’s pocket regardless. There are 8-10 states that actually matter this year, and that ain’t one of them.
Oh please. Voters can do whatever they want. You guys are not black southerners being intimidated at the polls, let’s maybe put the violins away. Pointing out the practical realities of the electoral college and how it’s designed isn’t bullying. If you are a third party voter in this country, you absolutely need to get over yourself and your own insecurities in that respect and just say “Yes, that’s true, but I’m still not voting blue”. And that’s perfectly okay. If people are too mentally weak to accept those realities and still vote their conscience, I guess they weren’t true leftists anyway.Jigsaw wrote:Liberals would be behind Biden anyway, as most are those vote-blue-no-matter-who-and-bully-every-single-Green-Party-voter pieces of shit. It's leftists I'm thinking about, those who wouldn't vote at all or vote third party, being put into a situation in which they don't think they have a choice to vote against both Trump and Biden, when clearly they do.Headhunter wrote:If people understood probabilities and how disincentivizing the electoral college is for voters, maybe you’d see that. Too many liberals in Indiana will think their vote matters to do something like that.Jigsaw wrote:I'm just hoping every leftist in every state, swing or not, votes for a leftist candidate and not for Biden. That'd be a victory in my eyes. Sadly, I don't think that's happening, as the Democratic Party is holing a gun to the heads of leftists and it'll get them enough votes to likely win, despite Biden being one of the shittiest candidates possible.Headhunter wrote:Lol you didn’t really think I was serious did youJigsaw wrote:In Indiana, Stein got about 7,400 write-in votes in 2016 (up from a mere ~700 that she got in 2012), so at least for my state, I'd like to see him get at least 3,500, though ideally more like 4,800, somewhere in that range.Headhunter wrote:2020 total votes, or like, to win?Jigsaw wrote:Didn't watch the debate because neither Biden nor Trump are worth shit.
Hawkins 2020.
Either way, I think we can all agree that Hawkins will get more than 2,020 total votes, given that he's on the ballot in a decent amount of states, and has write-in access in most of the one's he's not.
And almost no one who is voting for Hawkins expects him to win, but that's not the point of us voting for him, which I'm sure you know (even if you disagree with).
Do what you want. In a macro sense, Indiana is nothing more than 11 electoral votes in Trump’s pocket regardless. There are 8-10 states that actually matter this year, and that ain’t one of them.
Either way, no matter who wins, this country will continue to have no feasible way to move forward.
It is bullying the way I see Biden supporters doing it, actually. Sorry my experiences with plenty of Biden supporters is no different from cyber-bullying, but there you go. No violins necessary when Biden supporters are out there calling third party voters "idiots" and "illogical" when many of us know exactly what we're doing and why. Maybe they should get over the fact that not everyone is a Democrat, and that not all people to the left would support moderate Democrats (which shouldn't be hard to understand, but I've been called a "Trump-bot" by so many Biden supporters, it blows my mind).Headhunter wrote:Oh please. Voters can do whatever they want. You guys are not black southerners being intimidated at the polls, let’s maybe put the violins away. Pointing out the practical realities of the electoral college and how it’s designed isn’t bullying. If you are a third party voter in this country, you absolutely need to get over yourself and your own insecurities in that respect and just say “Yes, that’s true, but I’m still not voting blue”. And that’s perfectly okay. If people are too mentally weak to accept those realities and still vote their conscience, I guess they weren’t true leftists anyway.Jigsaw wrote:Liberals would be behind Biden anyway, as most are those vote-blue-no-matter-who-and-bully-every-single-Green-Party-voter pieces of shit. It's leftists I'm thinking about, those who wouldn't vote at all or vote third party, being put into a situation in which they don't think they have a choice to vote against both Trump and Biden, when clearly they do.Headhunter wrote:If people understood probabilities and how disincentivizing the electoral college is for voters, maybe you’d see that. Too many liberals in Indiana will think their vote matters to do something like that.Jigsaw wrote:I'm just hoping every leftist in every state, swing or not, votes for a leftist candidate and not for Biden. That'd be a victory in my eyes. Sadly, I don't think that's happening, as the Democratic Party is holing a gun to the heads of leftists and it'll get them enough votes to likely win, despite Biden being one of the shittiest candidates possible.Headhunter wrote:Lol you didn’t really think I was serious did youJigsaw wrote:In Indiana, Stein got about 7,400 write-in votes in 2016 (up from a mere ~700 that she got in 2012), so at least for my state, I'd like to see him get at least 3,500, though ideally more like 4,800, somewhere in that range.Headhunter wrote:2020 total votes, or like, to win?Jigsaw wrote:Didn't watch the debate because neither Biden nor Trump are worth shit.
Hawkins 2020.
Either way, I think we can all agree that Hawkins will get more than 2,020 total votes, given that he's on the ballot in a decent amount of states, and has write-in access in most of the one's he's not.
And almost no one who is voting for Hawkins expects him to win, but that's not the point of us voting for him, which I'm sure you know (even if you disagree with).
Do what you want. In a macro sense, Indiana is nothing more than 11 electoral votes in Trump’s pocket regardless. There are 8-10 states that actually matter this year, and that ain’t one of them.
Either way, no matter who wins, this country will continue to have no feasible way to move forward.
Jiggy, this country has a very real history of voter suppression and intimidation. It’s as ugly as you could imagine, only moreso. I’m sorry people are dicks but you being called an idiot or a bot on the internet does nothing for me. You gotta get over yourself here.Jigsaw wrote:It is bullying the way I see Biden supporters doing it, actually. Sorry my experiences with plenty of Biden supporters is no different from cyber-bullying, but there you go. No violins necessary when Biden supporters are out there calling third party voters "idiots" and "illogical" when many of us know exactly what we're doing and why. Maybe they should get over the fact that not everyone is a Democrat, and that not all people to the left would support moderate Democrats (which shouldn't be hard to understand, but I've been called a "Trump-bot" by so many Biden supporters, it blows my mind).Headhunter wrote:Oh please. Voters can do whatever they want. You guys are not black southerners being intimidated at the polls, let’s maybe put the violins away. Pointing out the practical realities of the electoral college and how it’s designed isn’t bullying. If you are a third party voter in this country, you absolutely need to get over yourself and your own insecurities in that respect and just say “Yes, that’s true, but I’m still not voting blue”. And that’s perfectly okay. If people are too mentally weak to accept those realities and still vote their conscience, I guess they weren’t true leftists anyway.Jigsaw wrote:Liberals would be behind Biden anyway, as most are those vote-blue-no-matter-who-and-bully-every-single-Green-Party-voter pieces of shit. It's leftists I'm thinking about, those who wouldn't vote at all or vote third party, being put into a situation in which they don't think they have a choice to vote against both Trump and Biden, when clearly they do.Headhunter wrote:If people understood probabilities and how disincentivizing the electoral college is for voters, maybe you’d see that. Too many liberals in Indiana will think their vote matters to do something like that.Jigsaw wrote:I'm just hoping every leftist in every state, swing or not, votes for a leftist candidate and not for Biden. That'd be a victory in my eyes. Sadly, I don't think that's happening, as the Democratic Party is holing a gun to the heads of leftists and it'll get them enough votes to likely win, despite Biden being one of the shittiest candidates possible.Headhunter wrote:Lol you didn’t really think I was serious did youJigsaw wrote:In Indiana, Stein got about 7,400 write-in votes in 2016 (up from a mere ~700 that she got in 2012), so at least for my state, I'd like to see him get at least 3,500, though ideally more like 4,800, somewhere in that range.Headhunter wrote:2020 total votes, or like, to win?Jigsaw wrote:Didn't watch the debate because neither Biden nor Trump are worth shit.
Hawkins 2020.
Either way, I think we can all agree that Hawkins will get more than 2,020 total votes, given that he's on the ballot in a decent amount of states, and has write-in access in most of the one's he's not.
And almost no one who is voting for Hawkins expects him to win, but that's not the point of us voting for him, which I'm sure you know (even if you disagree with).
Do what you want. In a macro sense, Indiana is nothing more than 11 electoral votes in Trump’s pocket regardless. There are 8-10 states that actually matter this year, and that ain’t one of them.
Either way, no matter who wins, this country will continue to have no feasible way to move forward.
The practical reality is that both Democrats and Republicans support capitalism, and it's counterproductive for anti-capitalist leftists to vote for them. Period.