HorrorMovieFans.com

Reign in Blood wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:could be this is a sign that we need to focus more on difference in policy again. rather than attacks on character and the like.

That would mean the democrats would have to change their entire political approach.

i'm aware. i wasn't just speaking to conservatives stopping it.

But wouldn't that mean liberals realizing how batshit insane they are?

zombie wrote:
cheating as in buying the election. clearly a way to invalidate the candidate.

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:
cheating as in buying the election. clearly a way to invalidate the candidate.

Your selective outrage is interesting. Like Democrats say it thousands of times every single election cycle and it is fine, in fact it becomes a rallying cry of "We need campaign finance reform!". Suddenly a republican says it and it is an assault on character and "clearly a way to invalidate a candidate". One sided propaganda much?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... b517c02249

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... ns-121907/

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:99.9% of white supremacists hate globalism. I don't see 99.9% of gay dudes supporting NAMBLA. You might see a higher % of Catholic priests though.

Good lord. What percentage of NANBLA members support gay rights?

I notice you are worried about slurs, then throw a shot at Catholics in there out of nowhere. Think you might be part of the problem?

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:
cheating as in buying the election. clearly a way to invalidate the candidate.

Your selective outrage is interesting. Like Democrats say it thousands of times every single election cycle and it is fine, in fact it becomes a rallying cry of "We need campaign finance reform!". Suddenly a republican says it and it is an assault on character and "clearly a way to invalidate a candidate". One sided propaganda much?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... b517c02249

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... ns-121907/

selective outrage? i was responding to a story that you linked. and i said that liberal politicians are guilty too.

Jmac Attack wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:
cheating as in buying the election. clearly a way to invalidate the candidate.

Your selective outrage is interesting. Like Democrats say it thousands of times every single election cycle and it is fine, in fact it becomes a rallying cry of "We need campaign finance reform!". Suddenly a republican says it and it is an assault on character and "clearly a way to invalidate a candidate". One sided propaganda much?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... b517c02249

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... ns-121907/

selective outrage? i was responding to a story that you linked. and i said that liberal politicians are guilty too.

Foo is very selective about who he selects as being outraged

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:That guy who mailed all those bombs.....probably hates Jews and globalism. The dude who shot up the synagogue, probably hates Jews and blames them for globalism. And now the dude in Kentucky shooting those elderly black folks, maybe ...most likely hates Jews and globalism.

But let the Kentucky shooting be investigated further to be fair. Like our president says, unless it's saying that Middle Easterners are a part of the immigration caravan. Then say that he has no proof at all of what he said maybe "fact". It's ok to spread falsehoods if it gets your base all riled up. Ugh.

what happens when you discover a person who dislikes globalism and likes Jews? Like myself. What does that do to your theory?

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:
cheating as in buying the election. clearly a way to invalidate the candidate.

Your selective outrage is interesting. Like Democrats say it thousands of times every single election cycle and it is fine, in fact it becomes a rallying cry of "We need campaign finance reform!". Suddenly a republican says it and it is an assault on character and "clearly a way to invalidate a candidate". One sided propaganda much?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... b517c02249

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... ns-121907/

selective outrage? i was responding to a story that you linked. and i said that liberal politicians are guilty too.

Foo is very selective about who he selects as being outraged

This is a joke. Don't take it seriously. Please. Lol. 85% of the time I'm just giving you guys shit.

Headhunter wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:

zombie wrote:

Foo wrote:

zombie wrote:
cheating as in buying the election. clearly a way to invalidate the candidate.

Your selective outrage is interesting. Like Democrats say it thousands of times every single election cycle and it is fine, in fact it becomes a rallying cry of "We need campaign finance reform!". Suddenly a republican says it and it is an assault on character and "clearly a way to invalidate a candidate". One sided propaganda much?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... b517c02249

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... ns-121907/

selective outrage? i was responding to a story that you linked. and i said that liberal politicians are guilty too.

Foo is very selective about who he selects as being outraged

This is a joke. Don't take it seriously. Please. Lol. 85% of the time I'm just giving you guys shit.

Oh come on J-Mac, it's better to double down on these things than walk them back.

Jmac Attack wrote:

Foo wrote:

Jmac Attack wrote:That guy who mailed all those bombs.....probably hates Jews and globalism. The dude who shot up the synagogue, probably hates Jews and blames them for globalism. And now the dude in Kentucky shooting those elderly black folks, maybe ...most likely hates Jews and globalism.

But let the Kentucky shooting be investigated further to be fair. Like our president says, unless it's saying that Middle Easterners are a part of the immigration caravan. Then say that he has no proof at all of what he said maybe "fact". It's ok to spread falsehoods if it gets your base all riled up. Ugh.

what happens when you discover a person who dislikes globalism and likes Jews? Like myself. What does that do to your theory?

I know you have love for the Jews. I said that not everyone who hates globalism hates Jews or are racist. R.I.F.....Reading is fundamental.

My point was, don't be surprised if others question or raise an eyebrow at you if you go on about globalism. I made that very clear. Very very clear.

Not saying it is right for others to do that, but until the right wingers go all out and piss off the white supremacists, you're unfortunately going to have that.