Re: The October Challenge Discussion Thread: 2017
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:39 pm
Hope the version you're watching is of better quality than the most common print.Tiggnutz wrote:First time watching 1962 Carnival of Souls
For Maniacs, By The Maniacs
https://horrormoviefans.com/forums/
Hope the version you're watching is of better quality than the most common print.Tiggnutz wrote:First time watching 1962 Carnival of Souls
Looks good to meJigsaw wrote:Hope the version you're watching is of better quality than the most common print.Tiggnutz wrote:First time watching 1962 Carnival of Souls
I'm really transfixed on the lead actressTiggnutz wrote:Looks good to meJigsaw wrote:Hope the version you're watching is of better quality than the most common print.Tiggnutz wrote:First time watching 1962 Carnival of Souls
Absolutely love this movie!Tiggnutz wrote:I'm really transfixed on the lead actressTiggnutz wrote:Looks good to meJigsaw wrote:Hope the version you're watching is of better quality than the most common print.Tiggnutz wrote:First time watching 1962 Carnival of Souls
What a movie I was glued from the opening scene. A wonderful example of great casting and a captivating story being far far more important than budget. A+Jmac Attack wrote:Absolutely love this movie!Tiggnutz wrote:I'm really transfixed on the lead actressTiggnutz wrote:Looks good to meJigsaw wrote:Hope the version you're watching is of better quality than the most common print.Tiggnutz wrote:First time watching 1962 Carnival of Souls
I have been in the studio and learning my new job. I haven't even watched one movie. Ugh. Gonna remedy this tonight.
I own two different DVDs of House on Haunted Hill. One in black and white that is a dual release with Don't Look in the Basement. The other is a DVD by itself, but with the option of watching it in color or black & white. I've still never seen the movie in color. Was also debating watching it for this challenge.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:So glad Amazon Prime's House On Haunted Hill is not a bastardized color version like they did with Last Man On Earth and Night Of the Living Dead
Must have happened recently. Every six months I go through my ordered list of every horror movie I've seen and change the titles/years if IMDb does, and I still have House in my 1986.Jason wrote:When did IMDb change the release date of House from 1986 to 1985? lol. They've done this with more than a handful of movies I've noticed. Weirdos. I'm leaving it at 1986 when I update my tally.
Leave it at 1986. IMDb has been going partially retarded for years, and finally went full retard when they got rid of their message boards.Jigsaw wrote:Must have happened recently. Every six months I go through my ordered list of every horror movie I've seen and change the titles/years if IMDb does, and I still have House in my 1986.Jason wrote:When did IMDb change the release date of House from 1986 to 1985? lol. They've done this with more than a handful of movies I've noticed. Weirdos. I'm leaving it at 1986 when I update my tally.
I won't screw with altering my list now anyways. I'll look into it once I add all my viewings from October on the first day of November.Jason wrote:Leave it at 1986. IMDb has been going partially retarded for years, and finally went full retard when they got rid of their message boards.Jigsaw wrote:Must have happened recently. Every six months I go through my ordered list of every horror movie I've seen and change the titles/years if IMDb does, and I still have House in my 1986.Jason wrote:When did IMDb change the release date of House from 1986 to 1985? lol. They've done this with more than a handful of movies I've noticed. Weirdos. I'm leaving it at 1986 when I update my tally.
Damn. We really should all honor Tobe Hooper this challenge, shouldn't we?Tiggnutz wrote:Rewatch of The Funhouse
Looks like a hoot.Havok wrote:I think i'm gonna give Satanico Pandemonium a watch, because I need something older to get the bad taste of the last few shitty new movies out of my mind.