lol, somehow forgot Point Break. Johnny Utah wins.Jason wrote:The Matrix was overrated to high hell. Speed is probably his best flick behind Point Break.Headhunter wrote:I didn't say he had to be a badass mofo in every movie. That movie was made after Speed and The Matrix.Jason wrote:Headhunter wrote:You do have to go back to the 1980s to find a time when Keanu was goofy in the way Cruise always will be.
July 30th, 2017
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: July 30th, 2017
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: July 30th, 2017
are the politics in the movie telling you what kind of action hero should and should not be in a movie?Jason wrote:If politics didn't play a part in the movie, there would be no criticism.zombie wrote:no, politics played no part in his criticism of the movie.Headhunter wrote:I'm sure that annoying Crowder guy is very consistent in his approach to picking apart unrealistic scenes in films, and this was in no way a unique occasion based on gender.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: July 30th, 2017
Intimidator was the wrong word to use, more about presence than anything. "Do I buy what I'm seeing from THAT guy?" basically.Jason wrote:Did you see Jack Reacher? He is anything but an intimidator in that movie.Headhunter wrote:And I like Cruise better overall than Keanu. His filmography is one of the best ever. But as an intimidator, it isn't close.Jason wrote:I actually like Keanu better overall than Cruise. Jack Reacher was just a way better flick than Wick.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: July 30th, 2017
you know if natalie portman had been cast instead of charlize theron, you would never even have made a fuss. 

Re: July 30th, 2017
The entire Jack Reacher movie is completely character driven with a very detailed plot. 95% of Reacher's character is based on intellect. Jack Reacher isn't a mindless fun, action, beat 'em up flick like John Wick is. Which is why I don't understand why the two are compared on these boards.Headhunter wrote:Intimidator was the wrong word to use, more about presence than anything. "Do I buy what I'm seeing from THAT guy?" basically.Jason wrote:Did you see Jack Reacher? He is anything but an intimidator in that movie.Headhunter wrote:And I like Cruise better overall than Keanu. His filmography is one of the best ever. But as an intimidator, it isn't close.Jason wrote:I actually like Keanu better overall than Cruise. Jack Reacher was just a way better flick than Wick.


Re: July 30th, 2017
Natalie Portman stays in her lane. I don't have to worry about a movie like that with her.zombie wrote:you know if natalie portman had been cast instead of charlize theron, you would never even have made a fuss.


- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: July 30th, 2017
If we're being real, we're grading presence of action stars on a curve. None of them have the total package we saw from 80s action stars. The guy who would be the closest if he wanted to be is The Rock, but he just doesn't take those roles. He'd really be killer though.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: July 30th, 2017
Female lesbian badass beats up countless men in unrealistic ways, many of whom happen to be Russian.zombie wrote:are the politics in the movie telling you what kind of action hero should and should not be in a movie?Jason wrote:If politics didn't play a part in the movie, there would be no criticism.zombie wrote:no, politics played no part in his criticism of the movie.Headhunter wrote:I'm sure that annoying Crowder guy is very consistent in his approach to picking apart unrealistic scenes in films, and this was in no way a unique occasion based on gender.
Politics.


Re: July 30th, 2017
"stays in her lane"? ouch.Jason wrote:Natalie Portman stays in her lane. I don't have to worry about a movie like that with her.zombie wrote:you know if natalie portman had been cast instead of charlize theron, you would never even have made a fuss.

Re: July 30th, 2017
I don't know what the fuck he's doing. Why even take steroids when you're gonna co-star in a teen comedy with Zac Efron?Headhunter wrote:If we're being real, we're grading presence of action stars on a curve. None of them have the total package we saw from 80s action stars. The guy who would be the closest if he wanted to be is The Rock, but he just doesn't take those roles. He'd really be killer though.


Re: July 30th, 2017
I'm kidding.zombie wrote:"stays in her lane"? ouch.Jason wrote:Natalie Portman stays in her lane. I don't have to worry about a movie like that with her.zombie wrote:you know if natalie portman had been cast instead of charlize theron, you would never even have made a fuss.
Natalie Portman is politically liberal, but I am still a fan... until she pulls a Sean Penn.


Re: July 30th, 2017
it looks like she takes a lot of beating from those same guys. she's just scrappy.Jason wrote:Female lesbian badass beats up countless men in unrealistic ways, many of whom happen to be Russian.zombie wrote:are the politics in the movie telling you what kind of action hero should and should not be in a movie?Jason wrote:If politics didn't play a part in the movie, there would be no criticism.zombie wrote:no, politics played no part in his criticism of the movie.Headhunter wrote:I'm sure that annoying Crowder guy is very consistent in his approach to picking apart unrealistic scenes in films, and this was in no way a unique occasion based on gender.
Politics.

Re: July 30th, 2017
i'm aware. i didn't take it seriously.Jason wrote:I'm kidding.zombie wrote:"stays in her lane"? ouch.Jason wrote:Natalie Portman stays in her lane. I don't have to worry about a movie like that with her.zombie wrote:you know if natalie portman had been cast instead of charlize theron, you would never even have made a fuss.
Natalie Portman is politically liberal, but I am still a fan... until she pulls a Sean Penn.
Re: July 30th, 2017
One thing I love about Jack Reacher is its Conservative approach. You never see that in Hollywood, anymore. Huge points there. In both movies. But the first was considerably greater.


Re: July 30th, 2017
there aren't nearly the type of big action guys like there were in the 80s, definitely. that doesn't mean that action heroes can't be capable at any size. there's room for sarah connor and john mcclane as much as there is for rambo and dutch.Headhunter wrote:If we're being real, we're grading presence of action stars on a curve. None of them have the total package we saw from 80s action stars. The guy who would be the closest if he wanted to be is The Rock, but he just doesn't take those roles. He'd really be killer though.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: July 30th, 2017
It really is too bad. One ironic family comedy every few years would be fine as an exception people could ignore, but he jumps into every piece of shit project.Jason wrote:I don't know what the fuck he's doing. Why even take steroids when you're gonna co-star in a teen comedy with Zac Efron?Headhunter wrote:If we're being real, we're grading presence of action stars on a curve. None of them have the total package we saw from 80s action stars. The guy who would be the closest if he wanted to be is The Rock, but he just doesn't take those roles. He'd really be killer though.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: July 30th, 2017
Not just the peak physique guys. Who can play the John McClanes of today?zombie wrote:there aren't nearly the type of big action guys like there were in the 80s, definitely. that doesn't mean that action heroes can't be capable at any size. there's room for sarah connor and john mcclane as much as there is for rambo and dutch.Headhunter wrote:If we're being real, we're grading presence of action stars on a curve. None of them have the total package we saw from 80s action stars. The guy who would be the closest if he wanted to be is The Rock, but he just doesn't take those roles. He'd really be killer though.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: July 30th, 2017
jason statham made a career of essentially doing just that, didn't he? maybe not what you guys like, but he was pretty successful for a while. liam neeson, denzel washington, and a slew of other more dramatic actors have taken to the action hero thing recently too.Headhunter wrote:Not just the peak physique guys. Who can play the John McClanes of today?zombie wrote:there aren't nearly the type of big action guys like there were in the 80s, definitely. that doesn't mean that action heroes can't be capable at any size. there's room for sarah connor and john mcclane as much as there is for rambo and dutch.Headhunter wrote:If we're being real, we're grading presence of action stars on a curve. None of them have the total package we saw from 80s action stars. The guy who would be the closest if he wanted to be is The Rock, but he just doesn't take those roles. He'd really be killer though.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: July 30th, 2017
I've sat in chairs with more personality than Jason Statham.zombie wrote:jason statham made a career of essentially doing just that, didn't he? maybe not what you guys like, but he was pretty successful for a while. liam neeson, denzel washington, and a slew of other more dramatic actors have taken to the action hero thing recently too.Headhunter wrote:Not just the peak physique guys. Who can play the John McClanes of today?zombie wrote:there aren't nearly the type of big action guys like there were in the 80s, definitely. that doesn't mean that action heroes can't be capable at any size. there's room for sarah connor and john mcclane as much as there is for rambo and dutch.Headhunter wrote:If we're being real, we're grading presence of action stars on a curve. None of them have the total package we saw from 80s action stars. The guy who would be the closest if he wanted to be is The Rock, but he just doesn't take those roles. He'd really be killer though.
Those guys can flat out act so yeah they can do action. It is not the same though.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: July 30th, 2017
hehe fair enough.Headhunter wrote:I've sat in chairs with more personality than Jason Statham.zombie wrote:jason statham made a career of essentially doing just that, didn't he? maybe not what you guys like, but he was pretty successful for a while. liam neeson, denzel washington, and a slew of other more dramatic actors have taken to the action hero thing recently too.Headhunter wrote:Not just the peak physique guys. Who can play the John McClanes of today?zombie wrote:there aren't nearly the type of big action guys like there were in the 80s, definitely. that doesn't mean that action heroes can't be capable at any size. there's room for sarah connor and john mcclane as much as there is for rambo and dutch.Headhunter wrote:If we're being real, we're grading presence of action stars on a curve. None of them have the total package we saw from 80s action stars. The guy who would be the closest if he wanted to be is The Rock, but he just doesn't take those roles. He'd really be killer though.
Those guys can flat out act so yeah they can do action. It is not the same though.
well, bruce willis didn't start as an action guy, if that's what you're getting at? it would be cool to have more like willis, ford, gibson, and swayze type action heroes today. maybe when superheroes run the course, we'll get back to something more like that.