Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2020 2:10 pm
Zombie Tidal Wave (2019) up next - looks like a true classic.
For Maniacs, By The Maniacs
https://horrormoviefans.com/forums/
four skulls was fun old b movie fare. nothing but the night was more about cop investigation than horror, but it was well made. cushing and lee were a plus.Jigsaw wrote:What'd you think of these two brah?zombie wrote:zombie's tally:
106. the four skulls of jonathan drake (1959) - 70 min
107. nothing but the night (1972) - 90 min
Indeed. I've seen both, just needed to make sure you had the correct viewpoints.zombie wrote:four skulls was fun old b movie fare. nothing but the night was more about cop investigation than horror, but it was well made. cushing and lee were a plus.Jigsaw wrote:What'd you think of these two brah?zombie wrote:zombie's tally:
106. the four skulls of jonathan drake (1959) - 70 min
107. nothing but the night (1972) - 90 min
Definitely a favorite of mine. Great vibe.Tiggnutz wrote:Theatre of Blood. Vincent Price Diana Rigg and Madeline Smith
yeah, i think so. what were you looking at?DancesWithWerewolves wrote:We still keeping an hour minimum rule?
let's just agree that i always have the correct viewpoint?Jigsaw wrote:Indeed. I've seen both, just needed to make sure you had the correct viewpoints.zombie wrote:four skulls was fun old b movie fare. nothing but the night was more about cop investigation than horror, but it was well made. cushing and lee were a plus.Jigsaw wrote:What'd you think of these two brah?zombie wrote:zombie's tally:
106. the four skulls of jonathan drake (1959) - 70 min
107. nothing but the night (1972) - 90 min
I guess that would just make life easier.zombie wrote:let's just agree that i always have the correct viewpoint?Jigsaw wrote:Indeed. I've seen both, just needed to make sure you had the correct viewpoints.zombie wrote:four skulls was fun old b movie fare. nothing but the night was more about cop investigation than horror, but it was well made. cushing and lee were a plus.Jigsaw wrote:What'd you think of these two brah?zombie wrote:zombie's tally:
106. the four skulls of jonathan drake (1959) - 70 min
107. nothing but the night (1972) - 90 min
If it's under an hour, just watch enough of it again to get it to 60 minutes.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:We still keeping an hour minimum rule?
I'm not a fan of doing that, especially if it sucks (I mean, if we're logging the minutes where the total minutes count in the end, then why does it matter?). I was just checking. Never Hike In the Snow came out the other day and it's 31 minutes. I'm still gonna watch it, but won't get counted.Jigsaw wrote:If it's under an hour, just watch enough of it again to get it to 60 minutes.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:We still keeping an hour minimum rule?
I don't like doing that, and it makes me feel cheap, but I'm a whore, so I've done it a few times.
i think the rule was originally meant as a way to keep people from watching several episodes of a tv series like the walking dead or something and counting that in the challenge. but we can retire it, as we can probably all agree that doing that is dumb.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:I'm not a fan of doing that, especially if it sucks (I mean, if we're logging the minutes where the total minutes count in the end, then why does it matter?). I was just checking. Never Hike In the Snow came out the other day and it's 31 minutes. I'm still gonna watch it, but won't get counted.Jigsaw wrote:If it's under an hour, just watch enough of it again to get it to 60 minutes.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:We still keeping an hour minimum rule?
I don't like doing that, and it makes me feel cheap, but I'm a whore, so I've done it a few times.
If I want to watch a 59 minute movie, you people just try and stop me.zombie wrote:i think the rule was originally meant as a way to keep people from watching several episodes of a tv series like the walking dead or something and counting that in the challenge. but we can retire it, as we can probably all agree that doing that is dumb.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:I'm not a fan of doing that, especially if it sucks (I mean, if we're logging the minutes where the total minutes count in the end, then why does it matter?). I was just checking. Never Hike In the Snow came out the other day and it's 31 minutes. I'm still gonna watch it, but won't get counted.Jigsaw wrote:If it's under an hour, just watch enough of it again to get it to 60 minutes.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:We still keeping an hour minimum rule?
I don't like doing that, and it makes me feel cheap, but I'm a whore, so I've done it a few times.
There's a 58 minute werewolf movie on my watchlist on Prime lolJigsaw wrote:If I want to watch a 59 minute movie, you people just try and stop me.zombie wrote:i think the rule was originally meant as a way to keep people from watching several episodes of a tv series like the walking dead or something and counting that in the challenge. but we can retire it, as we can probably all agree that doing that is dumb.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:I'm not a fan of doing that, especially if it sucks (I mean, if we're logging the minutes where the total minutes count in the end, then why does it matter?). I was just checking. Never Hike In the Snow came out the other day and it's 31 minutes. I'm still gonna watch it, but won't get counted.Jigsaw wrote:If it's under an hour, just watch enough of it again to get it to 60 minutes.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:We still keeping an hour minimum rule?
I don't like doing that, and it makes me feel cheap, but I'm a whore, so I've done it a few times.