May 30th 2020
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 9:35 am
Had to get the DCuniverse streaming service so I can watch the second season of Harley Quinn
Apparently Shudder has a technical issue uploading it to their catalog as well, so it's not just amazon.zombie wrote:so i've got access to cannibal holocaust and the edited joebob breaks only version of the movie... but no dead heat. curse you amazon!
Watched it and cancelled the service. Positively evilTiggnutz wrote:Had to get the DCuniverse streaming service so I can watch the second season of Harley Quinn
It's still pretty good. Yeah, it's near the bottom for Nolan films in general (for me I think it ranks above Following), but for that being a "bad" Nolan film, it's still pretty good.zombie wrote:i wanna watch interstellar but i don't have it to watch.... bad nolan fan.
What was on it? I've been curious but haven't looked. I imagined a bunch of their animated movies.Tiggnutz wrote:Watched it and cancelled the service. Positively evilTiggnutz wrote:Had to get the DCuniverse streaming service so I can watch the second season of Harley Quinn
i would put it just above the dark knight rises in his filmography, instead of following. it's an imperfect film because it tries for so much, in my opinion. i just want to watch it again. maybe i'll get hulu. it looks like they have it.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:It's still pretty good. Yeah, it's near the bottom for Nolan films in general (for me I think it ranks above Following), but for that being a "bad" Nolan film, it's still pretty good.zombie wrote:i wanna watch interstellar but i don't have it to watch.... bad nolan fan.
Ah, the way it sounded, it was like you haven't seen it yet lol. It is imperfect, but the good still outweighs the bad by quite a bit. There's a lot in there, and not enough screentime to let it breathe, imo.zombie wrote:i would put it just above the dark knight rises in his filmography, instead of following. it's an imperfect film because it tries for so much, in my opinion. i just want to watch it again. maybe i'll get hulu. it looks like they have it.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:It's still pretty good. Yeah, it's near the bottom for Nolan films in general (for me I think it ranks above Following), but for that being a "bad" Nolan film, it's still pretty good.zombie wrote:i wanna watch interstellar but i don't have it to watch.... bad nolan fan.
indeed. also feel like arrival is kind of a response to interstellar. or like a sister movie, by another director, maybe.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Ah, the way it sounded, it was like you haven't seen it yet lol. It is imperfect, but the good still outweighs the bad by quite a bit. There's a lot in there, and not enough screentime to let it breathe, imo.zombie wrote:i would put it just above the dark knight rises in his filmography, instead of following. it's an imperfect film because it tries for so much, in my opinion. i just want to watch it again. maybe i'll get hulu. it looks like they have it.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:It's still pretty good. Yeah, it's near the bottom for Nolan films in general (for me I think it ranks above Following), but for that being a "bad" Nolan film, it's still pretty good.zombie wrote:i wanna watch interstellar but i don't have it to watch.... bad nolan fan.
That score though, that's increasingly become a top 5 Hans Zimmer score to me...
lol, kinda like how Darkest Hour fits well alongside Dunkirk?zombie wrote:indeed. also feel like arrival is kind of a response to interstellar. or like a sister movie, by another director, maybe.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Ah, the way it sounded, it was like you haven't seen it yet lol. It is imperfect, but the good still outweighs the bad by quite a bit. There's a lot in there, and not enough screentime to let it breathe, imo.zombie wrote:i would put it just above the dark knight rises in his filmography, instead of following. it's an imperfect film because it tries for so much, in my opinion. i just want to watch it again. maybe i'll get hulu. it looks like they have it.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:It's still pretty good. Yeah, it's near the bottom for Nolan films in general (for me I think it ranks above Following), but for that being a "bad" Nolan film, it's still pretty good.zombie wrote:i wanna watch interstellar but i don't have it to watch.... bad nolan fan.
That score though, that's increasingly become a top 5 Hans Zimmer score to me...
kind of, although those are both based around actual events in the same time period. so not exactly the same.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:lol, kinda like how Darkest Hour fits well alongside Dunkirk?zombie wrote:indeed. also feel like arrival is kind of a response to interstellar. or like a sister movie, by another director, maybe.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Ah, the way it sounded, it was like you haven't seen it yet lol. It is imperfect, but the good still outweighs the bad by quite a bit. There's a lot in there, and not enough screentime to let it breathe, imo.zombie wrote:i would put it just above the dark knight rises in his filmography, instead of following. it's an imperfect film because it tries for so much, in my opinion. i just want to watch it again. maybe i'll get hulu. it looks like they have it.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:It's still pretty good. Yeah, it's near the bottom for Nolan films in general (for me I think it ranks above Following), but for that being a "bad" Nolan film, it's still pretty good.zombie wrote:i wanna watch interstellar but i don't have it to watch.... bad nolan fan.
That score though, that's increasingly become a top 5 Hans Zimmer score to me...
I was thinking of the sibling-picture aspect.zombie wrote:kind of, although those are both based around actual events in the same time period. so not exactly the same.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:lol, kinda like how Darkest Hour fits well alongside Dunkirk?zombie wrote:indeed. also feel like arrival is kind of a response to interstellar. or like a sister movie, by another director, maybe.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Ah, the way it sounded, it was like you haven't seen it yet lol. It is imperfect, but the good still outweighs the bad by quite a bit. There's a lot in there, and not enough screentime to let it breathe, imo.zombie wrote:i would put it just above the dark knight rises in his filmography, instead of following. it's an imperfect film because it tries for so much, in my opinion. i just want to watch it again. maybe i'll get hulu. it looks like they have it.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:It's still pretty good. Yeah, it's near the bottom for Nolan films in general (for me I think it ranks above Following), but for that being a "bad" Nolan film, it's still pretty good.zombie wrote:i wanna watch interstellar but i don't have it to watch.... bad nolan fan.
That score though, that's increasingly become a top 5 Hans Zimmer score to me...
indeed. it is similar.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:I was thinking of the sibling-picture aspect.zombie wrote:kind of, although those are both based around actual events in the same time period. so not exactly the same.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:lol, kinda like how Darkest Hour fits well alongside Dunkirk?zombie wrote:indeed. also feel like arrival is kind of a response to interstellar. or like a sister movie, by another director, maybe.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:Ah, the way it sounded, it was like you haven't seen it yet lol. It is imperfect, but the good still outweighs the bad by quite a bit. There's a lot in there, and not enough screentime to let it breathe, imo.zombie wrote:i would put it just above the dark knight rises in his filmography, instead of following. it's an imperfect film because it tries for so much, in my opinion. i just want to watch it again. maybe i'll get hulu. it looks like they have it.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:It's still pretty good. Yeah, it's near the bottom for Nolan films in general (for me I think it ranks above Following), but for that being a "bad" Nolan film, it's still pretty good.zombie wrote:i wanna watch interstellar but i don't have it to watch.... bad nolan fan.
That score though, that's increasingly become a top 5 Hans Zimmer score to me...