Jason wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:35 pm
Jigsaw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 10:36 am
I don't think the election was rigged, but I 100% think Democrats are happy with the conflict in Ukraine, as they think that may work to their benefit when it comes to the upcoming elections.
On that note, I have some endorsements to make later on (that literally impact no on here, as it's Indiana-centric), which I'll be posting in the coming week.
It was inarguably rigged. They rigged their own election against Bernie twice in a row (which nobody argues) and stuffed ballot boxes in 2020. Elections typically get 50-60 million votes for either candidate and you're telling me Corn Pop's arch nemesis got 81 million? The guy who couldn't get more than 2 people to show up to a rally?
With all due respect, I don't personally believe that the election was rigged. I think Biden was lucky to have won, and I found it incredibly close, but I don't think it was rigged. The high voter turn-out could be from heavy concern from COVID, Trump's perceived mishandling, or just a reaction to the controversial Trump presidency.
I guess I should say that I'm not against the idea that it could have been rigged, but here's my issue: Trump was heard on a phone call asking that votes be found. Let's say that it was rigged - that's still an incredibly bad image for him. Even as a Trump supporter, you have to understand that, right?
And I hate to tell you, but there are a lot of people out there who don't think the Democratic Party rigged the 2016 and 2020 primaries - I've spoken to plenty who just don't see it. Now, I happen to agree - those primaries were 100% rigged - but let's not pretend there aren't people out there, such as a sizable percentage of the Democratic Party, who saw the primaries as fair-handed.
Possibly my all time favorite news headline. This came out of Scotland. They just openly admitted that their own scientific data can be used against them to prove them wrong. Basically, the headline means it's good news. Wouldn't want those pesky facts to interrupt the fear-mongering narrative. Imagine giving people less information because you're afraid they might come to their own conclusion if you give them all the information.
