Liberals run schools like they run cities

[Foo]

Incident starts at 42 seconds in.

Some things to consider:

- why is the teacher dressed in gym clothing?
- why are their students in class with their hoodies up?
- why did student think that behavior was ok?
- why did the teacher let the kid rant like that without getting help there?
- the cheap shot another student took on the teacher
- the hooting and hollering like it was a good time
- the lack of help breaking up the incident

[showa58taro]

Awful.

This is also irrelevant to Democrats. It would be just as irrelevant as if I’d posted the video under the headline “Trump causes more violence against Hispanic kids” which there’s no basis for either. Why be so intellectually dishonest? Why not discuss what you actually want to discuss without Democrats in it. If anything Betsy de Vos should see what bad school funding looks like.

[Foo]

Awful.

This is also irrelevant to Democrats. It would be just as irrelevant as if I’d posted the video under the headline “Trump causes more violence against Hispanic kids” which there’s no basis for either. Why be so intellectually dishonest? Why not discuss what you actually want to discuss without Democrats in it. If anything Betsy de Vos should see what bad school funding looks like.

Well, it is a very liberal area. If you think the Trump administration had something to do with that incident, I would not be shocked to learn people believe that at this point.

Also interesting that you think throwing money at it in any way addresses all the issues I had even beyond the fight. Maybe money is the reason the teacher wears gym clothes to work. Maybe they can't afford to teach kids the most basic things, like not wearing your hood up or hat on indoors. Maybe with a better budget, that kid would have broken up the fight instead of taking a cheap shot on the teacher.

[showa58taro]

Awful.

This is also irrelevant to Democrats. It would be just as irrelevant as if I’d posted the video under the headline “Trump causes more violence against Hispanic kids” which there’s no basis for either. Why be so intellectually dishonest? Why not discuss what you actually want to discuss without Democrats in it. If anything Betsy de Vos should see what bad school funding looks like.

Well, it is a very liberal area. If you think the Trump administration had something to do with that incident, I would not be shocked to learn people believe that at this point.

Also interesting that you think throwing money at it in any way addresses all the issues I had even beyond the fight. Maybe money is the reason the teacher wears gym clothes to work. Maybe they can't afford to teach kids the most basic things, like not wearing your hood up or hat on indoors. Maybe with a better budget, that kid would have broken up the fight instead of taking a cheap shot on the teacher.

Generally more money means better resources and teachers.

[Reign in Blood]

Awful.

This is also irrelevant to Democrats. It would be just as irrelevant as if I’d posted the video under the headline “Trump causes more violence against Hispanic kids” which there’s no basis for either. Why be so intellectually dishonest? Why not discuss what you actually want to discuss without Democrats in it. If anything Betsy de Vos should see what bad school funding looks like.

Well, it is a very liberal area. If you think the Trump administration had something to do with that incident, I would not be shocked to learn people believe that at this point.

Also interesting that you think throwing money at it in any way addresses all the issues I had even beyond the fight. Maybe money is the reason the teacher wears gym clothes to work. Maybe they can't afford to teach kids the most basic things, like not wearing your hood up or hat on indoors. Maybe with a better budget, that kid would have broken up the fight instead of taking a cheap shot on the teacher.

Generally more money means better resources and teachers.

True, but it also can't fix a lot of things.

[showa58taro]

Awful.

This is also irrelevant to Democrats. It would be just as irrelevant as if I’d posted the video under the headline “Trump causes more violence against Hispanic kids” which there’s no basis for either. Why be so intellectually dishonest? Why not discuss what you actually want to discuss without Democrats in it. If anything Betsy de Vos should see what bad school funding looks like.

Well, it is a very liberal area. If you think the Trump administration had something to do with that incident, I would not be shocked to learn people believe that at this point.

Also interesting that you think throwing money at it in any way addresses all the issues I had even beyond the fight. Maybe money is the reason the teacher wears gym clothes to work. Maybe they can't afford to teach kids the most basic things, like not wearing your hood up or hat on indoors. Maybe with a better budget, that kid would have broken up the fight instead of taking a cheap shot on the teacher.

Generally more money means better resources and teachers.

True, but it also can't fix a lot of things.

Seen some important changes made in subpar schools with “bad kids” once the right support structures are in place. It’s not just cash for books type stuff. Some problems are very hard to fix like having children who have a really poor attitude. But even then often it’s more than just “they’re a bad kid” type thing.

[Foo]

Awful.

This is also irrelevant to Democrats. It would be just as irrelevant as if I’d posted the video under the headline “Trump causes more violence against Hispanic kids” which there’s no basis for either. Why be so intellectually dishonest? Why not discuss what you actually want to discuss without Democrats in it. If anything Betsy de Vos should see what bad school funding looks like.

Well, it is a very liberal area. If you think the Trump administration had something to do with that incident, I would not be shocked to learn people believe that at this point.

Also interesting that you think throwing money at it in any way addresses all the issues I had even beyond the fight. Maybe money is the reason the teacher wears gym clothes to work. Maybe they can't afford to teach kids the most basic things, like not wearing your hood up or hat on indoors. Maybe with a better budget, that kid would have broken up the fight instead of taking a cheap shot on the teacher.

Generally more money means better resources and teachers.

We spend more than anyone for poor outcomes. Only a handful of tiny nations spend more, and everyone else who spend like we do gets better results.

We are infested with lazy, stupid teachers and disrespectful kids with single parents who do not value education.

[Jason]

What matters is how black people feel. They don't need a historian to explain a revisionist history of the past, they need to get away from the users and abusers. They have heard the promises, they have witnessed the results.

Democrats standing in the middle of poor black ghettos talking about this and that. They have heard all the lies.

"Revisionist history".

Explain.

Revisionist History is when you rewrite history to reflect an opinion or agenda. That guy's whole life is doing that. For a "historian" he sure does spend a lot of time shilling for democrats.

That is how it is in college. Liberal professors rewriting their own history. One professor failed a young woman's paper for using the word "mankind" saying that word only represents men, and is a very sexist word.

There is absolutely no way in fucking hell I am trusting ANYTHING a college professor is preaching. Liberal professors are rewriting history the way they want it to be remembered. P. pathetic. They have selective memory, and we're supposed to trust their teachings of things that happened long before they were born. They are giving students the Wimp Lo treatment, like in Kung Pow. "We have purposely trained him wrong. As a joke."

[zombie]

What matters is how black people feel. They don't need a historian to explain a revisionist history of the past, they need to get away from the users and abusers. They have heard the promises, they have witnessed the results.

Democrats standing in the middle of poor black ghettos talking about this and that. They have heard all the lies.

"Revisionist history".

Explain.

Revisionist History is when you rewrite history to reflect an opinion or agenda. That guy's whole life is doing that. For a "historian" he sure does spend a lot of time shilling for democrats.

That is how it is in college. Liberal professors rewriting their own history. One professor failed a young woman's paper for using the word "mankind" saying that word only represents men, and is a very sexist word.

There is absolutely no way in fucking hell I am trusting ANYTHING a college professor is preaching. Liberal professors are rewriting history the way they want it to be remembered. P. pathetic. They have selective memory, and we're supposed to trust their teachings of things that happened long before they were born. They are giving students the Wimp Lo treatment, like in Kung Pow. "We have purposely trained him wrong. As a joke."

give me some examples of this rewriting of history? cause calling "mankind" a sexist term has nothing to do with history.

[Foo]

What matters is how black people feel. They don't need a historian to explain a revisionist history of the past, they need to get away from the users and abusers. They have heard the promises, they have witnessed the results.

Democrats standing in the middle of poor black ghettos talking about this and that. They have heard all the lies.

"Revisionist history".

Explain.

Revisionist History is when you rewrite history to reflect an opinion or agenda. That guy's whole life is doing that. For a "historian" he sure does spend a lot of time shilling for democrats.

That is how it is in college. Liberal professors rewriting their own history. One professor failed a young woman's paper for using the word "mankind" saying that word only represents men, and is a very sexist word.

There is absolutely no way in fucking hell I am trusting ANYTHING a college professor is preaching. Liberal professors are rewriting history the way they want it to be remembered. P. pathetic. They have selective memory, and we're supposed to trust their teachings of things that happened long before they were born. They are giving students the Wimp Lo treatment, like in Kung Pow. "We have purposely trained him wrong. As a joke."

give me some examples of this rewriting of history? cause calling "mankind" a sexist term has nothing to do with history.

What would you call removing confederate statues? Trying to scrub slave owners' accomplishments from the public conscience? How we villainize former heroes who fought indians?

[zombie]

What matters is how black people feel. They don't need a historian to explain a revisionist history of the past, they need to get away from the users and abusers. They have heard the promises, they have witnessed the results.

Democrats standing in the middle of poor black ghettos talking about this and that. They have heard all the lies.

"Revisionist history".

Explain.

Revisionist History is when you rewrite history to reflect an opinion or agenda. That guy's whole life is doing that. For a "historian" he sure does spend a lot of time shilling for democrats.

That is how it is in college. Liberal professors rewriting their own history. One professor failed a young woman's paper for using the word "mankind" saying that word only represents men, and is a very sexist word.

There is absolutely no way in fucking hell I am trusting ANYTHING a college professor is preaching. Liberal professors are rewriting history the way they want it to be remembered. P. pathetic. They have selective memory, and we're supposed to trust their teachings of things that happened long before they were born. They are giving students the Wimp Lo treatment, like in Kung Pow. "We have purposely trained him wrong. As a joke."

give me some examples of this rewriting of history? cause calling "mankind" a sexist term has nothing to do with history.

What would you call removing confederate statues? Trying to scrub slave owners' accomplishments from the public conscience? How we villainize former heroes who fought indians?

the statue thing is stupid and i've argued that point into the ground. the accomplishments shouldn't be downplayed or written away and the slavery shouldn't be downplayed or written away either. i've seen it done both ways. successful people can be garbage at the same time.

fought indians? did they invade britain or europe and we had to defend ourselves? isn't that a little bit of rewriting history?

[Foo]

What matters is how black people feel. They don't need a historian to explain a revisionist history of the past, they need to get away from the users and abusers. They have heard the promises, they have witnessed the results.

Democrats standing in the middle of poor black ghettos talking about this and that. They have heard all the lies.

"Revisionist history".

Explain.

Revisionist History is when you rewrite history to reflect an opinion or agenda. That guy's whole life is doing that. For a "historian" he sure does spend a lot of time shilling for democrats.

That is how it is in college. Liberal professors rewriting their own history. One professor failed a young woman's paper for using the word "mankind" saying that word only represents men, and is a very sexist word.

There is absolutely no way in fucking hell I am trusting ANYTHING a college professor is preaching. Liberal professors are rewriting history the way they want it to be remembered. P. pathetic. They have selective memory, and we're supposed to trust their teachings of things that happened long before they were born. They are giving students the Wimp Lo treatment, like in Kung Pow. "We have purposely trained him wrong. As a joke."

give me some examples of this rewriting of history? cause calling "mankind" a sexist term has nothing to do with history.

What would you call removing confederate statues? Trying to scrub slave owners' accomplishments from the public conscience? How we villainize former heroes who fought indians?

the statue thing is stupid and i've argued that point into the ground. the accomplishments shouldn't be downplayed or written away and the slavery shouldn't be downplayed or written away either. i've seen it done both ways. successful people can be garbage at the same time.

fought indians? did they invade britain or europe and we had to defend ourselves? isn't that a little bit of rewriting history?

You asked for examples of rewriting history, so I gave you some. History is constantly being re-written. Your grandparents grew up with black Americans' contribution to history understated. Right now, it is probably overstated. Wars and their justification, views of political figures, etc.

[zombie]

What matters is how black people feel. They don't need a historian to explain a revisionist history of the past, they need to get away from the users and abusers. They have heard the promises, they have witnessed the results.

Democrats standing in the middle of poor black ghettos talking about this and that. They have heard all the lies.

"Revisionist history".

Explain.

Revisionist History is when you rewrite history to reflect an opinion or agenda. That guy's whole life is doing that. For a "historian" he sure does spend a lot of time shilling for democrats.

That is how it is in college. Liberal professors rewriting their own history. One professor failed a young woman's paper for using the word "mankind" saying that word only represents men, and is a very sexist word.

There is absolutely no way in fucking hell I am trusting ANYTHING a college professor is preaching. Liberal professors are rewriting history the way they want it to be remembered. P. pathetic. They have selective memory, and we're supposed to trust their teachings of things that happened long before they were born. They are giving students the Wimp Lo treatment, like in Kung Pow. "We have purposely trained him wrong. As a joke."

give me some examples of this rewriting of history? cause calling "mankind" a sexist term has nothing to do with history.

What would you call removing confederate statues? Trying to scrub slave owners' accomplishments from the public conscience? How we villainize former heroes who fought indians?

the statue thing is stupid and i've argued that point into the ground. the accomplishments shouldn't be downplayed or written away and the slavery shouldn't be downplayed or written away either. i've seen it done both ways. successful people can be garbage at the same time.

fought indians? did they invade britain or europe and we had to defend ourselves? isn't that a little bit of rewriting history?

You asked for examples of rewriting history, so I gave you some. History is constantly being re-written. Your grandparents grew up with black Americans' contribution to history understated. Right now, it is probably overstated. Wars and their justification, views of political figures, etc.

so this is not a thing where modern liberals are at the root of everything bad or dishonest. that's refreshing.

[Foo]

What matters is how black people feel. They don't need a historian to explain a revisionist history of the past, they need to get away from the users and abusers. They have heard the promises, they have witnessed the results.

Democrats standing in the middle of poor black ghettos talking about this and that. They have heard all the lies.

"Revisionist history".

Explain.

Revisionist History is when you rewrite history to reflect an opinion or agenda. That guy's whole life is doing that. For a "historian" he sure does spend a lot of time shilling for democrats.

That is how it is in college. Liberal professors rewriting their own history. One professor failed a young woman's paper for using the word "mankind" saying that word only represents men, and is a very sexist word.

There is absolutely no way in fucking hell I am trusting ANYTHING a college professor is preaching. Liberal professors are rewriting history the way they want it to be remembered. P. pathetic. They have selective memory, and we're supposed to trust their teachings of things that happened long before they were born. They are giving students the Wimp Lo treatment, like in Kung Pow. "We have purposely trained him wrong. As a joke."

give me some examples of this rewriting of history? cause calling "mankind" a sexist term has nothing to do with history.

What would you call removing confederate statues? Trying to scrub slave owners' accomplishments from the public conscience? How we villainize former heroes who fought indians?

the statue thing is stupid and i've argued that point into the ground. the accomplishments shouldn't be downplayed or written away and the slavery shouldn't be downplayed or written away either. i've seen it done both ways. successful people can be garbage at the same time.

fought indians? did they invade britain or europe and we had to defend ourselves? isn't that a little bit of rewriting history?

You asked for examples of rewriting history, so I gave you some. History is constantly being re-written. Your grandparents grew up with black Americans' contribution to history understated. Right now, it is probably overstated. Wars and their justification, views of political figures, etc.

so this is not a thing where modern liberals are at the root of everything bad or dishonest. that's refreshing.

There have always been bad and dishonest people around, right now it just happens to be liberals.

[showa58taro]

Awful.

This is also irrelevant to Democrats. It would be just as irrelevant as if I’d posted the video under the headline “Trump causes more violence against Hispanic kids” which there’s no basis for either. Why be so intellectually dishonest? Why not discuss what you actually want to discuss without Democrats in it. If anything Betsy de Vos should see what bad school funding looks like.

Well, it is a very liberal area. If you think the Trump administration had something to do with that incident, I would not be shocked to learn people believe that at this point.

Also interesting that you think throwing money at it in any way addresses all the issues I had even beyond the fight. Maybe money is the reason the teacher wears gym clothes to work. Maybe they can't afford to teach kids the most basic things, like not wearing your hood up or hat on indoors. Maybe with a better budget, that kid would have broken up the fight instead of taking a cheap shot on the teacher.

Generally more money means better resources and teachers.

We spend more than anyone for poor outcomes. Only a handful of tiny nations spend more, and everyone else who spend like we do gets better results.

We are infested with lazy, stupid teachers and disrespectful kids with single parents who do not value education.

Why have you not changed the system then?

[zombie]

What matters is how black people feel. They don't need a historian to explain a revisionist history of the past, they need to get away from the users and abusers. They have heard the promises, they have witnessed the results.

Democrats standing in the middle of poor black ghettos talking about this and that. They have heard all the lies.

"Revisionist history".

Explain.

Revisionist History is when you rewrite history to reflect an opinion or agenda. That guy's whole life is doing that. For a "historian" he sure does spend a lot of time shilling for democrats.

That is how it is in college. Liberal professors rewriting their own history. One professor failed a young woman's paper for using the word "mankind" saying that word only represents men, and is a very sexist word.

There is absolutely no way in fucking hell I am trusting ANYTHING a college professor is preaching. Liberal professors are rewriting history the way they want it to be remembered. P. pathetic. They have selective memory, and we're supposed to trust their teachings of things that happened long before they were born. They are giving students the Wimp Lo treatment, like in Kung Pow. "We have purposely trained him wrong. As a joke."

give me some examples of this rewriting of history? cause calling "mankind" a sexist term has nothing to do with history.

What would you call removing confederate statues? Trying to scrub slave owners' accomplishments from the public conscience? How we villainize former heroes who fought indians?

the statue thing is stupid and i've argued that point into the ground. the accomplishments shouldn't be downplayed or written away and the slavery shouldn't be downplayed or written away either. i've seen it done both ways. successful people can be garbage at the same time.

fought indians? did they invade britain or europe and we had to defend ourselves? isn't that a little bit of rewriting history?

You asked for examples of rewriting history, so I gave you some. History is constantly being re-written. Your grandparents grew up with black Americans' contribution to history understated. Right now, it is probably overstated. Wars and their justification, views of political figures, etc.

so this is not a thing where modern liberals are at the root of everything bad or dishonest. that's refreshing.

There have always been bad and dishonest people around, right now it just happens to be liberals.

*right now, you only focus on the ones that are liberals.

[Foo]

Awful.

This is also irrelevant to Democrats. It would be just as irrelevant as if I’d posted the video under the headline “Trump causes more violence against Hispanic kids” which there’s no basis for either. Why be so intellectually dishonest? Why not discuss what you actually want to discuss without Democrats in it. If anything Betsy de Vos should see what bad school funding looks like.

Well, it is a very liberal area. If you think the Trump administration had something to do with that incident, I would not be shocked to learn people believe that at this point.

Also interesting that you think throwing money at it in any way addresses all the issues I had even beyond the fight. Maybe money is the reason the teacher wears gym clothes to work. Maybe they can't afford to teach kids the most basic things, like not wearing your hood up or hat on indoors. Maybe with a better budget, that kid would have broken up the fight instead of taking a cheap shot on the teacher.

Generally more money means better resources and teachers.

We spend more than anyone for poor outcomes. Only a handful of tiny nations spend more, and everyone else who spend like we do gets better results.

We are infested with lazy, stupid teachers and disrespectful kids with single parents who do not value education.

Why have you not changed the system then?

Been trying to end the welfare state causing it for years.

[showa58taro]

Awful.

This is also irrelevant to Democrats. It would be just as irrelevant as if I’d posted the video under the headline “Trump causes more violence against Hispanic kids” which there’s no basis for either. Why be so intellectually dishonest? Why not discuss what you actually want to discuss without Democrats in it. If anything Betsy de Vos should see what bad school funding looks like.

Well, it is a very liberal area. If you think the Trump administration had something to do with that incident, I would not be shocked to learn people believe that at this point.

Also interesting that you think throwing money at it in any way addresses all the issues I had even beyond the fight. Maybe money is the reason the teacher wears gym clothes to work. Maybe they can't afford to teach kids the most basic things, like not wearing your hood up or hat on indoors. Maybe with a better budget, that kid would have broken up the fight instead of taking a cheap shot on the teacher.

Generally more money means better resources and teachers.

We spend more than anyone for poor outcomes. Only a handful of tiny nations spend more, and everyone else who spend like we do gets better results.

We are infested with lazy, stupid teachers and disrespectful kids with single parents who do not value education.

Why have you not changed the system then?

Been trying to end the welfare state causing it for years.

I’m not following the argument. Teachers in jobs lack training because of welfare?

[Tiggnutz]

[Tiggnutz]

You would think this would be considered assault or at the very very least grounds for expulsion. Not in the Sewer of Baltimore hasn't even been suspended yet. Speaks volumes about why things are the way they are.