Even from that era, I would say 96 or 97. WCW and ECW were going strong. By 2000, both turned from wine to vinegar.Tiggnutz wrote:So is 2000 the greatest year ever for wrestling?
Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
Forum rules
There are no refs here.
There are no refs here.
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
Do you remember how bad WCW got the last couple years? It would have had to improve 100% to be even called WrestleCrap. Judy Bagwell on a pole. Viagra on a pole. David Arquette and Vince Russo both winning the World Title, Jarrett laying down for Hogan, Nash handing Flair the belt, etc.Jason wrote:Monday Night Wars era. Everything from like 1996-2001
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
I missed alot of WCW and almost all of ECW becuase of being in the militay. From 92 until maybe 97 I wasnt watching wrestling at all.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11635
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
For the WWF, definitely. Was the ideal combination of Attitude Era energy with memorable PPVs and matches. The earlier years of the era were entertaining for the wild storylines and personalities, but the quality of wrestling wasn't as high.Tiggnutz wrote:So is 2000 the greatest year ever for wrestling?
The WCW/ECW transplants really took the mid card to another level as well.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
Yeah. That's when WWF took over as king for me. But mid-90s WCW was amazing. Hall & Nash and the nWo was the best thing ever.Foo wrote:Do you remember how bad WCW got the last couple years? It would have had to improve 100% to be even called WrestleCrap. Judy Bagwell on a pole. Viagra on a pole. David Arquette and Vince Russo both winning the World Title, Jarrett laying down for Hogan, Nash handing Flair the belt, etc.Jason wrote:Monday Night Wars era. Everything from like 1996-2001
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11635
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
It was definitely a disappointing Mania. Still, I consider the tag team ladder match one of the best ever.Reign in Blood wrote:Definitely up there overall, but I was at WrestleMania 2000 aka 16 and it's easily regarded as one of the worst (as being there I think some are harsher on it, but definitely bottom end), so IDK.Tiggnutz wrote:So is 2000 the greatest year ever for wrestling?
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
Nia Jax is the type of chick that would get KO'd by Jeff Jarrett's guitar.
"I didn't have a damn hour to walk around her."
"I didn't have a damn hour to walk around her."
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11635
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
1995-1998 ECW is as good as it gets. That was also probably the golden era of WCW.Tiggnutz wrote:I missed alot of WCW and almost all of ECW becuase of being in the militay. From 92 until maybe 97 I wasnt watching wrestling at all.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
Yup. Damn shame Tigg missed that shit. I have a bunch of old Nitro/Thunder VHS tapes lying around somewhere. Every time I see a DVD box set of 90s era WCW it is an instant buy.Headhunter wrote:1995-1998 ECW is as good as it gets. That was also probably the golden era of WCW.Tiggnutz wrote:I missed alot of WCW and almost all of ECW becuase of being in the militay. From 92 until maybe 97 I wasnt watching wrestling at all.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11635
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
The WWF really capitalized on WCW's inability to prioritize its young talent. I can't hate on ECW in that sense, they knew how to push those guys but it was always going to be an uphill battle to hang on to them.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
I used to rent all stuff i could from that era years later at Blockbuster they would have the pay per views and shit.Jason wrote:Yup. Damn shame Tigg missed that shit. I have a bunch of old Nitro/Thunder VHS tapes lying around somewhere. Every time I see a DVD box set of 90s era WCW it is an instant buy.Headhunter wrote:1995-1998 ECW is as good as it gets. That was also probably the golden era of WCW.Tiggnutz wrote:I missed alot of WCW and almost all of ECW becuase of being in the militay. From 92 until maybe 97 I wasnt watching wrestling at all.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11635
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
The last truly great era to me was SmackDown's mini-run in the early 2000s after the brand split where they seemed to have all the best young talents. Plus, the GOAT Paul Heyman was the head writer at the time. By comparison, RAW was old, sluggish and couldn't figure out how to build anything interesting around Triple H's title runs.
Last edited by Headhunter on Wed Dec 05, 2018 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
I felt alone in preferring Smackdown back then. But RAW did have Evolution.
- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 10191
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
I think '99 overall, maybe. Looks like that's when I really got into ECW and WWF firing on all cylinders. WCW coming down, not bad, but still. I mean they did the finger-poke of doom then, and then Vince and co. raped them and never looked back.
2025 Is The Vibe!
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11635
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
I think it's just more people watched Raw. In hindsight I don't see how anyone could have preferred it. The quality of the wrestling was soooooo much better on Smackdown. Angle, Lesnar, young heel Cena, Biker Undertaker, Eddie, Benoit, Edge...Jason wrote:I felt alone in preferring Smackdown back then. But RAW did have Evolution.
SmackDown's roster would really get gutted starting in 04. They had to get really creative to even make it watchable for a time.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
Sounds about right, if memory serves.Headhunter wrote:I think it's just more people watched Raw. In hindsight I don't see how anyone could have preferred it. The quality of the wrestling was soooooo much better on Smackdown. Angle, Lesnar, young heel Cena, Biker Undertaker, Eddie, Benoit, Edge...Jason wrote:I felt alone in preferring Smackdown back then. But RAW did have Evolution.
SmackDown's roster would really get gutted starting in 04. They had to get really creative to even make it watchable for a time.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11635
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 11635
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
How extensive is the WWE Network library? What do they and don't they have? Debating getting a subscription.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Current Pro Wrestling Discussion
I think I free-trialed it years back. But not sure.
Try for a free trial and dig around.
Try for a free trial and dig around.