Random Political Comments
Forum rules
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
Pretty open-ended but yeah that would be the most appropriate starting point. Pretty much every aspect of the criminal justice system is bad and needs to be exposed for its absurdity and cruelty.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
In OJ's case, that is absolutely the answer. Black people backed O.J. because they didn't trust the LAPD.zombie wrote:i don't think that's the answer as it relates to situations like oj simpson, but in general i think that better training, more accountability, and the like could be a good step for police officers.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 9476
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
See now that feels like something we can debate. How to reform that shit, obviously Seb and the Euros like the Holiday Inn and Spa treatment.Headhunter wrote:Pretty open-ended but yeah that would be the most appropriate starting point. Pretty much every aspect of the criminal justice system is bad and needs to be exposed for its absurdity and cruelty.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
I think you have to define what you want the prisoner to be getting out of it. For Europeans, it's all about disincentivizing criminal behavior and building traits that will make them productive citizens. It's a system built on encouragement and positivity.Reign in Blood wrote:See now that feels like something we can debate. How to reform that shit, obviously Seb and the Euros like the Holiday Inn and Spa treatment.Headhunter wrote:Pretty open-ended but yeah that would be the most appropriate starting point. Pretty much every aspect of the criminal justice system is bad and needs to be exposed for its absurdity and cruelty.
In the U.S. the focus is kind of on making the prisoner suffer. I think it's fair to say people get a collective satisfaction out of bad things happening to bad people. And it seems properly miserable, but since we're not just throwing every undesirable in front of a firing squad, I feel like the goal should be to get the most out of their time. I think ideally you want to balance having some appropriate fear of punishment with opportunity for growth. Prison here feels more like school for criminals.
Last edited by Headhunter on Sat Aug 31, 2019 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
well, tribalism of that kind needs to be looked at from within, as well as from beyond, from what external factors may play into it.Headhunter wrote:In OJ's case, that is absolutely the answer. Black people backed O.J. because they didn't trust the LAPD.zombie wrote:i don't think that's the answer as it relates to situations like oj simpson, but in general i think that better training, more accountability, and the like could be a good step for police officers.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
Of course you look at both perspectives but that's kind of pointless unless you understand how and why they work in concert. People don't behave irrationally for shits and giggles.zombie wrote:well, tribalism of that kind needs to be looked at from within, as well as from beyond, from what external factors may play into it.Headhunter wrote:In OJ's case, that is absolutely the answer. Black people backed O.J. because they didn't trust the LAPD.zombie wrote:i don't think that's the answer as it relates to situations like oj simpson, but in general i think that better training, more accountability, and the like could be a good step for police officers.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
does the cops seeing how a violent criminal was excused and covered for play into their role within that concert at all? do you think reform or shift in behavior needs to come from all sides, or is it only from the authority figures?Headhunter wrote:Of course you look at both perspectives but that's kind of pointless unless you understand how and why they work in concert. People don't behave irrationally for shits and giggles.zombie wrote:well, tribalism of that kind needs to be looked at from within, as well as from beyond, from what external factors may play into it.Headhunter wrote:In OJ's case, that is absolutely the answer. Black people backed O.J. because they didn't trust the LAPD.zombie wrote:i don't think that's the answer as it relates to situations like oj simpson, but in general i think that better training, more accountability, and the like could be a good step for police officers.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
Not sure what you're asking with the first question, but authority figures should always be held to the highest standard and the world tends to react accordingly to the actions of our leaders so it naturally falls on them more than anyone else.zombie wrote:does the cops seeing how a violent criminal was excused and covered for play into their role within that concert at all? do you think reform or shift in behavior needs to come from all sides, or is it only from the authority figures?Headhunter wrote:Of course you look at both perspectives but that's kind of pointless unless you understand how and why they work in concert. People don't behave irrationally for shits and giggles.zombie wrote:well, tribalism of that kind needs to be looked at from within, as well as from beyond, from what external factors may play into it.Headhunter wrote:In OJ's case, that is absolutely the answer. Black people backed O.J. because they didn't trust the LAPD.zombie wrote:i don't think that's the answer as it relates to situations like oj simpson, but in general i think that better training, more accountability, and the like could be a good step for police officers.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
well. you want all the blame to fall to the cops. so we're not gonna agree. but some reform and more responsibility would be good. like i already said.Headhunter wrote: Not sure what you're asking with the first question, but authority figures should always be held to the highest standard and the world tends to react accordingly to the actions of our leaders so it naturally falls on them more than anyone else.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
I should have been more clear on this but this doesn't make sense. You want them to evaluate their behavior but ignore the clear and obvious reasons for that behavior. What exactly does that accomplishzombie wrote:well, tribalism of that kind needs to be looked at from within, as well as from beyond, from what external factors may play into it.Headhunter wrote:In OJ's case, that is absolutely the answer. Black people backed O.J. because they didn't trust the LAPD.zombie wrote:i don't think that's the answer as it relates to situations like oj simpson, but in general i think that better training, more accountability, and the like could be a good step for police officers.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
We're talking about bad policing. Yes, the blame for bad policing is going to fall on police.zombie wrote:well. you want all the blame to fall to the cops. so we're not gonna agree. but some reform and more responsibility would be good. like i already said.Headhunter wrote: Not sure what you're asking with the first question, but authority figures should always be held to the highest standard and the world tends to react accordingly to the actions of our leaders so it naturally falls on them more than anyone else.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
i think that it has to go both ways. cops treat black people badly and that has an effect on their behavior toward and regard for the cops. black people defend and excuse fucking trash of a human being and that has an effect on how cops treat them and regard them.Headhunter wrote:I should have been more clear on this but this doesn't make sense. You want them to evaluate their behavior but ignore the clear and obvious reasons for that behavior. What exactly does that accomplishzombie wrote:well, tribalism of that kind needs to be looked at from within, as well as from beyond, from what external factors may play into it.Headhunter wrote:In OJ's case, that is absolutely the answer. Black people backed O.J. because they didn't trust the LAPD.zombie wrote:i don't think that's the answer as it relates to situations like oj simpson, but in general i think that better training, more accountability, and the like could be a good step for police officers.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
"Goes both ways" only works with parallel situations. Power dynamics are so different, they can't be compared.zombie wrote:i think that it has to go both ways. cops treat black people badly and that has an effect on their behavior toward and regard for the cops. black people defend and excuse fucking trash of a human being and that has an effect on how cops treat them and regard them.Headhunter wrote:I should have been more clear on this but this doesn't make sense. You want them to evaluate their behavior but ignore the clear and obvious reasons for that behavior. What exactly does that accomplishzombie wrote:well, tribalism of that kind needs to be looked at from within, as well as from beyond, from what external factors may play into it.Headhunter wrote:In OJ's case, that is absolutely the answer. Black people backed O.J. because they didn't trust the LAPD.zombie wrote:i don't think that's the answer as it relates to situations like oj simpson, but in general i think that better training, more accountability, and the like could be a good step for police officers.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
As I said before, had nothing to do with OJ. They didn't care about OJ any more than white football fans. When an institution fails time and time again to do right, they lose credibility and trust and people view everything they do with skepticism.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
we aren't disagreeing about need for more accountability and reform for police officers. so we can just leave it there, i guess.Headhunter wrote:As I said before, had nothing to do with OJ. They didn't care about OJ any more than white football fans. When an institution fails time and time again to do right, they lose credibility and trust and people view everything they do with skepticism.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
So it just seems weird to shame people for adopting that attitude of total skepticism. They are reacting to things we know to be problems. Of course it would be better if they liked and trusted the police, but that's on the police to earn their trust.zombie wrote:we aren't disagreeing about need for more accountability and reform for police officers. so we can just leave it there, i guess.Headhunter wrote:As I said before, had nothing to do with OJ. They didn't care about OJ any more than white football fans. When an institution fails time and time again to do right, they lose credibility and trust and people view everything they do with skepticism.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
it seems weird to fight me on thinking that something should be done about a piece of shit being able to hide behind his identity and use it to absolve himself. but if all that blame falls to the cops, and nothing else can be done in addition, i guess i won't argue you out of your position.Headhunter wrote:So it just seems weird to shame people for adopting that attitude of total skepticism. They are reacting to things we know to be problems. Of course it would be better if they liked and trusted the police, but that's on the police to earn their trust.zombie wrote:we aren't disagreeing about need for more accountability and reform for police officers. so we can just leave it there, i guess.Headhunter wrote:As I said before, had nothing to do with OJ. They didn't care about OJ any more than white football fans. When an institution fails time and time again to do right, they lose credibility and trust and people view everything they do with skepticism.
- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 9476
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
When cops are bad, it's all on the cops. When pieces of shit are bad, it's all on the cops. Pretty straight forward.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10964
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
You must be mistaking me for someone else because I have absolutely no clue what you're referring to here. Definitely didn't fight about...whatever that is.zombie wrote:it seems weird to fight me on thinking that something should be done about a piece of shit being able to hide behind his identity and use it to absolve himself. but if all that blame falls to the cops, and nothing else can be done in addition, i guess i won't argue you out of your position.Headhunter wrote:So it just seems weird to shame people for adopting that attitude of total skepticism. They are reacting to things we know to be problems. Of course it would be better if they liked and trusted the police, but that's on the police to earn their trust.zombie wrote:we aren't disagreeing about need for more accountability and reform for police officers. so we can just leave it there, i guess.Headhunter wrote:As I said before, had nothing to do with OJ. They didn't care about OJ any more than white football fans. When an institution fails time and time again to do right, they lose credibility and trust and people view everything they do with skepticism.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Jason's Random Political Comments
well, i've tried to be pretty clear that that is my position. and you boil it down to mocking people for being uneasy or untrusting of police and authority. so i don't know how else to express the position.Headhunter wrote:You must be mistaking me for someone else because I have absolutely no clue what you're referring to here. Definitely didn't fight about...whatever that is.zombie wrote:it seems weird to fight me on thinking that something should be done about a piece of shit being able to hide behind his identity and use it to absolve himself. but if all that blame falls to the cops, and nothing else can be done in addition, i guess i won't argue you out of your position.Headhunter wrote:So it just seems weird to shame people for adopting that attitude of total skepticism. They are reacting to things we know to be problems. Of course it would be better if they liked and trusted the police, but that's on the police to earn their trust.zombie wrote:we aren't disagreeing about need for more accountability and reform for police officers. so we can just leave it there, i guess.Headhunter wrote:As I said before, had nothing to do with OJ. They didn't care about OJ any more than white football fans. When an institution fails time and time again to do right, they lose credibility and trust and people view everything they do with skepticism.