October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
- Jigsaw
- Charter Member
- Posts: 3885
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
- Location: Columbia City, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
Been waiting for this day all month.
I'll be watching seven different versions of The Hound of the Baskervilles - 1914, 1929, 1937, 1939, 1959, 1972, and 1983. Three of these are rewatches (1939, 1959, and 1972). Should be a fun time.
I'll be watching seven different versions of The Hound of the Baskervilles - 1914, 1929, 1937, 1939, 1959, 1972, and 1983. Three of these are rewatches (1939, 1959, and 1972). Should be a fun time.
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
- Jigsaw
- Charter Member
- Posts: 3885
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
- Location: Columbia City, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
So the 1929 version is missing a few portions, so in those missing moments, the restoration summarizes the plot while using stills of characters introduced within the missing scenes.
Actually works out quite well, and a bit better than some telesnap recreations that Doctor Who later had to do (such as the DVD release for The Underwater Menace from the Second Doctor).
Actually works out quite well, and a bit better than some telesnap recreations that Doctor Who later had to do (such as the DVD release for The Underwater Menace from the Second Doctor).
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
- Jigsaw
- Charter Member
- Posts: 3885
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
- Location: Columbia City, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
The Holmes from the 1914 version (Alwin Neuß) was, in my opinion, a better rendition than the 1929 version (Carlyle Blackwell), but I will give the 1929 version a far stronger sense of ominous atmosphere present, and that opening was killer.
Onto the 1937 version.
Onto the 1937 version.
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 10953
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
Oh damnJigsaw wrote:Been waiting for this day all month.
I'll be watching seven different versions of The Hound of the Baskervilles - 1914, 1929, 1937, 1939, 1959, 1972, and 1983. Three of these are rewatches (1939, 1959, and 1972). Should be a fun time.
- Jigsaw
- Charter Member
- Posts: 3885
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
- Location: Columbia City, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
Despite the 1937 being the weakest of the first three, I do think that the Sherlock Holmes (Bruno Güttner) was the best-portrayed there. It probably helped that the movie wasn't silent, but neither the 1914 nor 1929 really showed a more analytic side of him, whereas Bruno Güttner's portrayal was more in line with what you might see from more modern-day adaptations.
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
- Jigsaw
- Charter Member
- Posts: 3885
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
- Location: Columbia City, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
Onto one of the most classic versions, 1939's starring Basil Rathbone.
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 10953
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
I think I've only seen 3 of those, and pretty sure 59 one was my favorite, but I'm so unsure because now it's been a while since I've seen it. I know I didn't care for one of the later ones (pretty sure it was the 83 one, with Lancelot from Excalibur). I believe the 39 one was the other one I've seen, but not since I was *much* younger.
- Jigsaw
- Charter Member
- Posts: 3885
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
- Location: Columbia City, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
'59 with Cushing is a fantastic movie (just about to start it shortly), and it helps that it's both Hammer and in color, but I'd recommend looking back on the '39 version whenever the moment arises.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:I think I've only seen 3 of those, and pretty sure 59 one was my favorite, but I'm so unsure because now it's been a while since I've seen it. I know I didn't care for one of the later ones (pretty sure it was the 83 one, with Lancelot from Excalibur). I believe the 39 one was the other one I've seen, but not since I was *much* younger.
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
the ending was a slight drawback to an otherwise good ride.Jigsaw wrote:It didn't necessarily blow it (I still rated the movie an average rating of 7/10) but I do think it could have been better, especially with the first half of the film being a decent 8.5/10.zombie wrote:really liking what keeps you alive, so far. so i hope the ending doesn't blow it like it did for jiggy.
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
bad blood looks to be fun low budget fare, so far. hope it keeps up.
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
Ready or Not in 4k
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 10953
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
I might actually do so.Jigsaw wrote:'59 with Cushing is a fantastic movie (just about to start it shortly), and it helps that it's both Hammer and in color, but I'd recommend looking back on the '39 version whenever the moment arises.DancesWithWerewolves wrote:I think I've only seen 3 of those, and pretty sure 59 one was my favorite, but I'm so unsure because now it's been a while since I've seen it. I know I didn't care for one of the later ones (pretty sure it was the 83 one, with Lancelot from Excalibur). I believe the 39 one was the other one I've seen, but not since I was *much* younger.
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 10953
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
Watching a retrospective on Halloween 5 before I start anything. Layton Eversaul puts together pretty damn good retrospective/reviews on youtube, and he just freshly uploaded this.
- Jigsaw
- Charter Member
- Posts: 3885
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
- Location: Columbia City, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
So I've seen the 1972 television version before, but God, talk about a dry and tedious movie. It's the first one that's getting a below average rating, and not just a little below.
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
- DancesWithWerewolves
- Administrator
- Posts: 10953
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
chalk it up to another dead hate the living kind of flick, that only i'll dig.zombie wrote:bad blood looks to be fun low budget fare, so far. hope it keeps up.
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
New watch Bliss
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
I waited to watch this because it looked like something I would hate. So far I was rightTiggnutz wrote:New watch Bliss
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
No new watches this year. I've got a handful or two or watches this year. Really a pathetic outing.
Re: October Challenge 2020 Discussion Thread
you still have time.Jason wrote:No new watches this year. I've got a handful or two or watches this year. Really a pathetic outing.