President Donald J. Trump Inauguration Celebration

[zombie]

If I link to an article or Twitter post it isn't solely to represent my conclusive analysis of an event or social issue. None of us know what really happened or why the crash happened the way it did. The breadcrumbs in all of this seem to indicate to me that this woman was almost certainly hired to fill a gap in whatever diversity hole needed filled rather than her merit or qualifications as a capable and competent pilot. And if my indications are correct then the consequences of that have resulted in catastrophic death with the entirety of blame placed directly to Diversity Equity and Inclusion. Not Rebecca Lobach. It's easier to assume I'm a madman who doesn't want women to fly an airplane rather than put effort into understanding the intent of my message.

i tried to make it clear that the people you read and link to are the problem, not you.

[Jason]

If I link to an article or Twitter post it isn't solely to represent my conclusive analysis of an event or social issue. None of us know what really happened or why the crash happened the way it did. The breadcrumbs in all of this seem to indicate to me that this woman was almost certainly hired to fill a gap in whatever diversity hole needed filled rather than her merit or qualifications as a capable and competent pilot. And if my indications are correct then the consequences of that have resulted in catastrophic death with the entirety of blame placed directly to Diversity Equity and Inclusion. Not Rebecca Lobach. It's easier to assume I'm a madman who doesn't want women to fly an airplane rather than put effort into understanding the intent of my message.

i tried to make it clear that the people you read and link to are the problem, not you.

The CBS News article you linked to that focused on praising the airline for not killing anyone while evacuating passengers from an upside down plane rather than asking how the hell the pilot couldn't perform a routine landing is not a problem?

[zombie]

If I link to an article or Twitter post it isn't solely to represent my conclusive analysis of an event or social issue. None of us know what really happened or why the crash happened the way it did. The breadcrumbs in all of this seem to indicate to me that this woman was almost certainly hired to fill a gap in whatever diversity hole needed filled rather than her merit or qualifications as a capable and competent pilot. And if my indications are correct then the consequences of that have resulted in catastrophic death with the entirety of blame placed directly to Diversity Equity and Inclusion. Not Rebecca Lobach. It's easier to assume I'm a madman who doesn't want women to fly an airplane rather than put effort into understanding the intent of my message.

i tried to make it clear that the people you read and link to are the problem, not you.

The CBS News article you linked to that focused on praising the airline for not killing anyone while evacuating passengers from an upside down plane rather than asking how the hell the pilot couldn't perform a routine landing is not a problem?

praising the crew for handling an aircraft crash in a way that caused no fatalities is how i read it. if it comes out that pilot error caused the crash, i will adjust my view on it.

[zombie]

but i have been wrong about things i've linked to, or people i bought into, in the past. i am certainly not infallible. nor too stubborn to admit when i get something wrong.

[Jason]

If I link to an article or Twitter post it isn't solely to represent my conclusive analysis of an event or social issue. None of us know what really happened or why the crash happened the way it did. The breadcrumbs in all of this seem to indicate to me that this woman was almost certainly hired to fill a gap in whatever diversity hole needed filled rather than her merit or qualifications as a capable and competent pilot. And if my indications are correct then the consequences of that have resulted in catastrophic death with the entirety of blame placed directly to Diversity Equity and Inclusion. Not Rebecca Lobach. It's easier to assume I'm a madman who doesn't want women to fly an airplane rather than put effort into understanding the intent of my message.

i tried to make it clear that the people you read and link to are the problem, not you.

The CBS News article you linked to that focused on praising the airline for not killing anyone while evacuating passengers from an upside down plane rather than asking how the hell the pilot couldn't perform a routine landing is not a problem?

praising the crew for handling an aircraft crash in a way that caused no fatalities is how i read it. if it comes out that pilot error caused the crash, i will adjust my view on it.

I'm not sure, have you seen the video of the plane landing? It's quite clear the pilot put far too much weight on the landing gear and it collapsed instantly causing the plane itself to skid into a firestorm.

[Jason]

but i have been wrong about things i've linked to, or people i bought into, in the past. i am certainly not infallible. nor too stubborn to admit when i get something wrong.

I'm perfectly willing to admit I'm wrong if they release the information of the pilot, the experience, etc... I'm perfectly willing to listen to even preposterous things that would not suit my own personal purview. Even recently a good is example is I am still willing to entertain the idea and waiting for proof that Ted Nugent is a pedophile and adopted a child so he could fuck him or her. I am still open to that idea entirely but it seems that theory crash landed harder than the Delta plane in Toronto. So who knows.

[zombie]

but i have been wrong about things i've linked to, or people i bought into, in the past. i am certainly not infallible. nor too stubborn to admit when i get something wrong.

I'm perfectly willing to admit I'm wrong if they release the information of the pilot, the experience, etc... I'm perfectly willing to listen to even preposterous things that would not suit my own personal purview. Even recently a good is example is I am still willing to entertain the idea and waiting for proof that Ted Nugent is a pedophile and adopted a child so he could fuck him or her. I am still open to that idea entirely but it seems that theory crash landed harder than the Delta plane in Toronto. So who knows.

the ted nugent thing was never my fight. that whole fight sucked though. *hug*

[zombie]

If I link to an article or Twitter post it isn't solely to represent my conclusive analysis of an event or social issue. None of us know what really happened or why the crash happened the way it did. The breadcrumbs in all of this seem to indicate to me that this woman was almost certainly hired to fill a gap in whatever diversity hole needed filled rather than her merit or qualifications as a capable and competent pilot. And if my indications are correct then the consequences of that have resulted in catastrophic death with the entirety of blame placed directly to Diversity Equity and Inclusion. Not Rebecca Lobach. It's easier to assume I'm a madman who doesn't want women to fly an airplane rather than put effort into understanding the intent of my message.

i tried to make it clear that the people you read and link to are the problem, not you.

The CBS News article you linked to that focused on praising the airline for not killing anyone while evacuating passengers from an upside down plane rather than asking how the hell the pilot couldn't perform a routine landing is not a problem?

praising the crew for handling an aircraft crash in a way that caused no fatalities is how i read it. if it comes out that pilot error caused the crash, i will adjust my view on it.

I'm not sure, have you seen the video of the plane landing? It's quite clear the pilot put far too much weight on the landing gear and it collapsed instantly causing the plane itself to skid into a firestorm.

i saw the crash. it looked like they hit bad weather conditions and tried to compensate. the plane was coming in really fast, by the reports. fast enough to tear the plane apart if not handled well. maybe that is just trying to protect the crew or something, i don't know. but it seems to fit, so far. also, there was some talk that the airport should have not been operating at the time either, due to weather. again, i don't know.

[Jason]

but i have been wrong about things i've linked to, or people i bought into, in the past. i am certainly not infallible. nor too stubborn to admit when i get something wrong.

I'm perfectly willing to admit I'm wrong if they release the information of the pilot, the experience, etc... I'm perfectly willing to listen to even preposterous things that would not suit my own personal purview. Even recently a good is example is I am still willing to entertain the idea and waiting for proof that Ted Nugent is a pedophile and adopted a child so he could fuck him or her. I am still open to that idea entirely but it seems that theory crash landed harder than the Delta plane in Toronto. So who knows.

the ted nugent thing was never my fight. that whole fight sucked though. *hug*

Lol. I'm just saying I'm not as closed minded or abrasive as I appear to be. Though it may appear that way when I'm randomly shit posting. Which I tend to do quite often and probably go overboard on it. So maybe I'm deserving of the conflict or criticism.

[Jason]

If I link to an article or Twitter post it isn't solely to represent my conclusive analysis of an event or social issue. None of us know what really happened or why the crash happened the way it did. The breadcrumbs in all of this seem to indicate to me that this woman was almost certainly hired to fill a gap in whatever diversity hole needed filled rather than her merit or qualifications as a capable and competent pilot. And if my indications are correct then the consequences of that have resulted in catastrophic death with the entirety of blame placed directly to Diversity Equity and Inclusion. Not Rebecca Lobach. It's easier to assume I'm a madman who doesn't want women to fly an airplane rather than put effort into understanding the intent of my message.

i tried to make it clear that the people you read and link to are the problem, not you.

The CBS News article you linked to that focused on praising the airline for not killing anyone while evacuating passengers from an upside down plane rather than asking how the hell the pilot couldn't perform a routine landing is not a problem?

praising the crew for handling an aircraft crash in a way that caused no fatalities is how i read it. if it comes out that pilot error caused the crash, i will adjust my view on it.

I'm not sure, have you seen the video of the plane landing? It's quite clear the pilot put far too much weight on the landing gear and it collapsed instantly causing the plane itself to skid into a firestorm.

i saw the crash. it looked like they hit bad weather conditions and tried to compensate. the plane was coming in really fast, by the reports. fast enough to tear the plane apart if not handled well. maybe that is just trying to protect the crew or something, i don't know. but it seems to fit, so far. also, there was some talk that the airport should have not been operating at the time either, due to weather. again, i don't know.

I'm obviously not a pilot but they are equipped with unimaginably reliable radar and gadgets that can essentially do a lot of things for them. I have heard that the hardest part of flying a commercial plane is the landing. Even though the landing is routine it can be the most challenging part. So you best be qualified!

[zombie]

but i have been wrong about things i've linked to, or people i bought into, in the past. i am certainly not infallible. nor too stubborn to admit when i get something wrong.

I'm perfectly willing to admit I'm wrong if they release the information of the pilot, the experience, etc... I'm perfectly willing to listen to even preposterous things that would not suit my own personal purview. Even recently a good is example is I am still willing to entertain the idea and waiting for proof that Ted Nugent is a pedophile and adopted a child so he could fuck him or her. I am still open to that idea entirely but it seems that theory crash landed harder than the Delta plane in Toronto. So who knows.

the ted nugent thing was never my fight. that whole fight sucked though. *hug*

Lol. I'm just saying I'm not as closed minded or abrasive as I appear to be. Though it may appear that way when I'm randomly shit posting. Which I tend to do quite often and probably go overboard on it. So maybe I'm deserving of the conflict or criticism.

oh okay. it seemed like you were still upset over that.

i don't think you're close-minded. more stubborn or too proud when you feel like you're onto something. you probably think similarly of me.

[zombie]

If I link to an article or Twitter post it isn't solely to represent my conclusive analysis of an event or social issue. None of us know what really happened or why the crash happened the way it did. The breadcrumbs in all of this seem to indicate to me that this woman was almost certainly hired to fill a gap in whatever diversity hole needed filled rather than her merit or qualifications as a capable and competent pilot. And if my indications are correct then the consequences of that have resulted in catastrophic death with the entirety of blame placed directly to Diversity Equity and Inclusion. Not Rebecca Lobach. It's easier to assume I'm a madman who doesn't want women to fly an airplane rather than put effort into understanding the intent of my message.

i tried to make it clear that the people you read and link to are the problem, not you.

The CBS News article you linked to that focused on praising the airline for not killing anyone while evacuating passengers from an upside down plane rather than asking how the hell the pilot couldn't perform a routine landing is not a problem?

praising the crew for handling an aircraft crash in a way that caused no fatalities is how i read it. if it comes out that pilot error caused the crash, i will adjust my view on it.

I'm not sure, have you seen the video of the plane landing? It's quite clear the pilot put far too much weight on the landing gear and it collapsed instantly causing the plane itself to skid into a firestorm.

i saw the crash. it looked like they hit bad weather conditions and tried to compensate. the plane was coming in really fast, by the reports. fast enough to tear the plane apart if not handled well. maybe that is just trying to protect the crew or something, i don't know. but it seems to fit, so far. also, there was some talk that the airport should have not been operating at the time either, due to weather. again, i don't know.

I'm obviously not a pilot but they are equipped with unimaginably reliable radar and gadgets that can essentially do a lot of things for them. I have heard that the hardest part of flying a commercial plane is the landing. Even though the landing is routine it can be the most challenging part. So you best be qualified!

yeah. sometimes even the most qualified end up in a bad spot. we'll find out.

[Jason]

but i have been wrong about things i've linked to, or people i bought into, in the past. i am certainly not infallible. nor too stubborn to admit when i get something wrong.

I'm perfectly willing to admit I'm wrong if they release the information of the pilot, the experience, etc... I'm perfectly willing to listen to even preposterous things that would not suit my own personal purview. Even recently a good is example is I am still willing to entertain the idea and waiting for proof that Ted Nugent is a pedophile and adopted a child so he could fuck him or her. I am still open to that idea entirely but it seems that theory crash landed harder than the Delta plane in Toronto. So who knows.

the ted nugent thing was never my fight. that whole fight sucked though. *hug*

Lol. I'm just saying I'm not as closed minded or abrasive as I appear to be. Though it may appear that way when I'm randomly shit posting. Which I tend to do quite often and probably go overboard on it. So maybe I'm deserving of the conflict or criticism.

oh okay. it seemed like you were still upset over that.

i don't think you're close-minded. more stubborn or too proud when you feel like you're onto something. you probably think similarly of me.

No, I think the opposite actually. Your passion or strong opinion of a subject shows, though. I would be surprised for example if you weren't somehow personally affected with the transgender topic in one way or another.

[Jason]

This is the kind of stuff that gets me in trouble.

[zombie]

No, I think the opposite actually. Your passion or strong opinion of a subject shows, though. I would be surprised for example if you weren't somehow personally affected with the transgender topic in one way or another.

are you saying that i seem too close to it, in the way that i defend it? can you give an example?

[Jason]

No, I think the opposite actually. Your passion or strong opinion of a subject shows, though. I would be surprised for example if you weren't somehow personally affected with the transgender topic in one way or another.

are you saying that i seem to close to it, in the way that i defend it? can you give an example?

No, I mean like transgenderism seems like a topic that hits very close to home for you.

[zombie]

No, I think the opposite actually. Your passion or strong opinion of a subject shows, though. I would be surprised for example if you weren't somehow personally affected with the transgender topic in one way or another.

are you saying that i seem to close to it, in the way that i defend it? can you give an example?

No, I mean like transgenderism seems like a topic that hits very close to home for you.

well, i want to discuss or debate in a way that doesn't feel blind to things or too defensive because of whatever personal stuff there may be?

[Jason]

No, I think the opposite actually. Your passion or strong opinion of a subject shows, though. I would be surprised for example if you weren't somehow personally affected with the transgender topic in one way or another.

are you saying that i seem to close to it, in the way that i defend it? can you give an example?

No, I mean like transgenderism seems like a topic that hits very close to home for you.

well, i want to discuss or debate in a way that doesn't feel blind to things or too defensive because of whatever personal stuff there may be?

You do. Every subject is controversial and I simply got a sense that the transgender topic in particular may be a pretty personal one for you. It doesn't mean you're too defensive of it.

[zombie]

No, I think the opposite actually. Your passion or strong opinion of a subject shows, though. I would be surprised for example if you weren't somehow personally affected with the transgender topic in one way or another.

are you saying that i seem to close to it, in the way that i defend it? can you give an example?

No, I mean like transgenderism seems like a topic that hits very close to home for you.

well, i want to discuss or debate in a way that doesn't feel blind to things or too defensive because of whatever personal stuff there may be?

You do. Every subject is controversial and I simply got a sense that the transgender topic in particular may be a pretty personal one for you. It doesn't mean you're too defensive of it.

enh. maybe i'll share at some point. until then, just chalk it up to watching boys don't cry too often.

[Jason]

I was thinking Rocky Horror but Frank-N-Furter clearly gives no fucks what anyone thinks.