Trumpster Fire 2025

[zombie]

if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

"Shall not be infringed" is basically the "very" option. It's kinda on there twice. I am both.

shall not be infringed is more than gun rights though, no?

It's a direct quote from the 2nd amendment. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

i know the quote. if it only relates to gun ownership, that's dumb.

Depends on your interpretation of the article. If you're reading the quote and not trying to expand its meaning in your head, a citizen's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is kinda straight forward.

okay. fair. i meant dumb to include separately on that political compass thing, and redundant to count for yourself when you include the other too.

[Jason]

if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

"Shall not be infringed" is basically the "very" option. It's kinda on there twice. I am both.

shall not be infringed is more than gun rights though, no?

It's a direct quote from the 2nd amendment. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

i know the quote. if it only relates to gun ownership, that's dumb.

Depends on your interpretation of the article. If you're reading the quote and not trying to expand its meaning in your head, a citizen's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is kinda straight forward.

okay. fair. i meant dumb to include separately on that political compass thing, and redundant to count for yourself when you include the other too.

Yeah. The whole list is a little flawed and inaccurate, but there isn't really an exact model regarding a political spectrum chart.

[zombie]

do you really consider yourself individualist politically? what does that mean to you?

[Jason]

do you really consider yourself individualist politically? what does that mean to you?

Individualist in general. Just think for yourself and do right by you and your loved ones.

[zombie]

do you really consider yourself individualist politically? what does that mean to you?

Individualist in general. Just think for yourself and do right by you and your loved ones.

okay. i was thinking more broad than that, but cool. i guess we all fit it that way.

[Reign in Blood]

Sweet child of mine.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-ne ... 71661.html

[Reign in Blood]

if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

"Shall not be infringed" is basically the "very" option. It's kinda on there twice. I am both.

shall not be infringed is more than gun rights though, no?

It's a direct quote from the 2nd amendment. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

i know the quote. if it only relates to gun ownership, that's dumb.

Depends on your interpretation of the article. If you're reading the quote and not trying to expand its meaning in your head, a citizen's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is kinda straight forward.

Not when thou denizen rides thine bus that is small in the lengtheth.

[Jason]

if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

"Shall not be infringed" is basically the "very" option. It's kinda on there twice. I am both.

shall not be infringed is more than gun rights though, no?

It's a direct quote from the 2nd amendment. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

i know the quote. if it only relates to gun ownership, that's dumb.

Depends on your interpretation of the article. If you're reading the quote and not trying to expand its meaning in your head, a citizen's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is kinda straight forward.

Not when thou denizen rides thine bus that is small in the lengtheth.

So you're against guns for the retarded?

[Jason]

Sweet child of mine.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-ne ... 71661.html

I feel sorry for her and that family.

[Reign in Blood]

if it wasn't "very" pro-second amendment, i would have included that.

"Shall not be infringed" is basically the "very" option. It's kinda on there twice. I am both.

shall not be infringed is more than gun rights though, no?

It's a direct quote from the 2nd amendment. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

i know the quote. if it only relates to gun ownership, that's dumb.

Depends on your interpretation of the article. If you're reading the quote and not trying to expand its meaning in your head, a citizen's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is kinda straight forward.

Not when thou denizen rides thine bus that is small in the lengtheth.

So you're against guns for the retarded?

Yeah, so a good 75% of the world.

[Jason]

Yeah, so a good 75% of the world.

I already gots one.

[zombie]

Sweet child of mine.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-ne ... 71661.html

that is rough. i hope they never have to actually face something like that. i hope that abortion doesn't become federally illegal. so at least maybe they have some kind of way through it.

[Jigsaw]

Keep in mind that the far-left very much supports gun rights. It's liberals and so-called 'progressives' that don't.

Being 'woke' is not a sign of anything far-left, it's a sign of being liberal.

We need to make sure that we understand this. If you're a leftist, you are anti-capitalist, and hopefully voting for socialist parties. If you're a liberal, you're a supporter of capitalism (regulated, perhaps, but you still believe in capitalism), and likely vote straight Democratic and yell at far-leftists like myself, and related, if you're a liberal, you may idioically believe in the horseshoe theory.

Leftists and liberals are not the same, and do not have the same goals.

This is mostly directed at that picture Jason posted that seemed to imply the far-left was somehow 'woke,' and it just doesn't work that way.

[zombie]

"woke" is a term that the right uses to apply to anyone they don't like. it is not a term with a hard definition or parameters to meet or not meet. don't overthink it.

[Jigsaw]

"woke" is a term that the right uses to apply to anyone they don't like. it is not a term with a hard definition or parameters to meet or not meet. don't overthink it.

It's a misconception I see and hear all the time, and if I don't overthink, I miss out on the opportunity to correct perceived mistakes, which is one of the things I live for.

[zombie]

it's not a term that liberals apply to themselves either, the way the right uses it.

[Jason]

Keep in mind that the far-left very much supports gun rights. It's liberals and so-called 'progressives' that don't.

Being 'woke' is not a sign of anything far-left, it's a sign of being liberal.

We need to make sure that we understand this. If you're a leftist, you are anti-capitalist, and hopefully voting for socialist parties. If you're a liberal, you're a supporter of capitalism (regulated, perhaps, but you still believe in capitalism), and likely vote straight Democratic and yell at far-leftists like myself, and related, if you're a liberal, you may idioically believe in the horseshoe theory.

Leftists and liberals are not the same, and do not have the same goals.

This is mostly directed at that picture Jason posted that seemed to imply the far-left was somehow 'woke,' and it just doesn't work that way.

Being woke is not being liberal. Being liberal is anti-censorship, anti-war. Being woke is colorful haired weirdos who shame anyone who thinks there are only two genders and wants others' lives ruined for using pronouns that they deem improper.

[zombie]

"go woke go broke" has never meant don't be a bully asshole for your particular set of politics or you'll lose the dinero. but at least your way to use it could be somewhat defensible, if you actually stick to the way you laid it out here.

[Jason]

"go woke go broke" has never meant don't be a bully asshole for your particular set of politics or you'll lose the dinero. but at least your way to use it could be somewhat defensible, if you actually stick to the way you laid it out here.

What does that term mean to you?

[zombie]

"go woke go broke" has never meant don't be a bully asshole for your particular set of politics or you'll lose the dinero. but at least your way to use it could be somewhat defensible, if you actually stick to the way you laid it out here.

What does that term mean to you?

i don't like the term, because it's thrown out to just see if the accuser can make it stick in the public consciousness. but often it's thrown at some work of media or public figure that could be seen as socially or culturally subversive to conservative values.