Untangling Harvey Weinstein

It will get heated. Can't take it, don't open the forum.
Forum rules
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
User avatar
showa58taro
Administrator
Posts: 8729
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
Location: London, England

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by showa58taro »

Weinstein seems to be a creepy douche. Claiming to be feminist supportive whilst being a creep. What a hypocrite. Luckily the right never does that. How’s the Anti-abortion senator doing? :P
Image
User avatar
Tiggnutz
Administrator
Posts: 17266
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:35 pm
Location: Baltimore

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Tiggnutz »

Harvey is a sick fuck and sounds like a good candidate for chemical castration.
Image
Jmac Attack
Charter Member
Posts: 5402
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 10:20 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Jmac Attack »

showa58taro wrote:Weinstein seems to be a creepy douche. Claiming to be feminist supportive whilst being a creep. What a hypocrite. Luckily the right never does that. How’s the Anti-abortion senator doing? :P
Exactly. Hipocrites everywhere.
Jmac Attack
Charter Member
Posts: 5402
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 10:20 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Jmac Attack »

Foo wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Foo wrote:Don't see that the guy was convicted or a known child molester when Trump (or the Clintons) associated with him. Seemed like that came out later and he has been out of that loop since.
There’s always an excuse for trump isn’t there.
I guess that tends to happen when the guy is pulled into a conversation that has nothing to do with him because of zombie's obsession with tearing him down.
Uhhhh.....the obsession is the opposite. Look in the mirror. You can't say anything bad about him. At all. It's funny, because I am keeping track of all the good things I say about Trump. It's been 4 times in three weeks. I have heard crickets. I can't wait for you to tell my that I just hate him to hate him. Lulz. Carry on.......
Jmac Attack
Charter Member
Posts: 5402
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 10:20 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Jmac Attack »

Tiggnutz wrote:Harvey is a sick fuck and sounds like a good candidate for chemical castration.
This.
User avatar
Reign in Blood
Administrator
Posts: 9456
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Reign in Blood »

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/lis ... 24140.html

Gotta pick and choose. Win and lose.
Image
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Foo »

Jmac Attack wrote:
Foo wrote:
showa58taro wrote:
Foo wrote:Don't see that the guy was convicted or a known child molester when Trump (or the Clintons) associated with him. Seemed like that came out later and he has been out of that loop since.
There’s always an excuse for trump isn’t there.
I guess that tends to happen when the guy is pulled into a conversation that has nothing to do with him because of zombie's obsession with tearing him down.
Uhhhh.....the obsession is the opposite. Look in the mirror. You can't say anything bad about him. At all. It's funny, because I am keeping track of all the good things I say about Trump. It's been 4 times in three weeks. I have heard crickets. I can't wait for you to tell my that I just hate him to hate him. Lulz. Carry on.......
Did you build a special phone app for this purpose, or do you keep a little tiny notepad in your pocket?
User avatar
Headhunter
Charter Member
Posts: 10952
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Headhunter »

Conservatives said nothing about Roger Ailes. They should have some self respect and admit they don't actually care about the allegations, just that they can tie it to "the enemy".

Partisan hackery everywhere.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
User avatar
Headhunter
Charter Member
Posts: 10952
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Headhunter »

But I'll give the OP a fair shake and break it down. Making a big deal about this because it's tied to liberals/Democrats means one of two things:

1. You hold Democrats to a higher moral standard and believe the behavior would be acceptable from Republicans.

2. You're being a partisan hack who insults victims by dragging their stories through the mud for political brownie points.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Foo »

There are no victims in this as far as I have seen. There is no rape, there is one group of opportunists versus the other.
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Foo »

It is like a "feminist" battle royal. Keep hoping Joss Whedon will chime in.
User avatar
Headhunter
Charter Member
Posts: 10952
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Headhunter »

However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Foo »

Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!

And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
User avatar
Headhunter
Charter Member
Posts: 10952
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Headhunter »

Foo wrote:
Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!

And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
User avatar
Headhunter
Charter Member
Posts: 10952
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Headhunter »

This section is just a click-bait Breitbart knock off at this point.
Last edited by Headhunter on Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
User avatar
zombie
Administrator
Posts: 11700
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:28 pm

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by zombie »

Headhunter wrote:
Foo wrote:
Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!

And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.
maybe it would be more interesting if i left it alone? :P
User avatar
Headhunter
Charter Member
Posts: 10952
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Headhunter »

zombie wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Foo wrote:
Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!

And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.
maybe it would be more interesting if i left it alone? :P
I do think it's curious that you engage every time, but you're a good dude that way. You know what the deal is every time, nothing's going to change.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
User avatar
zombie
Administrator
Posts: 11700
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:28 pm

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by zombie »

Headhunter wrote:
zombie wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Foo wrote:
Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!

And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.
maybe it would be more interesting if i left it alone? :P
I do think it's curious that you engage every time, but you're a good dude that way. You know what the deal is every time, nothing's going to change.
it just feels like it needs to be challenged. that's my shortcoming, i guess.
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Foo »

Headhunter wrote:
Foo wrote:
Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!

And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.
I have taken this section under my wing and tried to generate discussion. Of course if I am making most of the threads it is going to tilt to my personality.
User avatar
Headhunter
Charter Member
Posts: 10952
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am

Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein

Post by Headhunter »

Foo, I do really respect that you're at least honest about the partisan nature of this stuff. We both know there are too many conservatives who constantly do the run-around bullshit to not offend 75% of the country. The semantics and the games with this stuff are annoying.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Post Reply