Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Forum rules
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
- showa58taro
- Administrator
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Weinstein seems to be a creepy douche. Claiming to be feminist supportive whilst being a creep. What a hypocrite. Luckily the right never does that. How’s the Anti-abortion senator doing?
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Harvey is a sick fuck and sounds like a good candidate for chemical castration.
-
- Charter Member
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 10:20 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Exactly. Hipocrites everywhere.showa58taro wrote:Weinstein seems to be a creepy douche. Claiming to be feminist supportive whilst being a creep. What a hypocrite. Luckily the right never does that. How’s the Anti-abortion senator doing?
-
- Charter Member
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 10:20 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Uhhhh.....the obsession is the opposite. Look in the mirror. You can't say anything bad about him. At all. It's funny, because I am keeping track of all the good things I say about Trump. It's been 4 times in three weeks. I have heard crickets. I can't wait for you to tell my that I just hate him to hate him. Lulz. Carry on.......Foo wrote:I guess that tends to happen when the guy is pulled into a conversation that has nothing to do with him because of zombie's obsession with tearing him down.showa58taro wrote:There’s always an excuse for trump isn’t there.Foo wrote:Don't see that the guy was convicted or a known child molester when Trump (or the Clintons) associated with him. Seemed like that came out later and he has been out of that loop since.
-
- Charter Member
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 10:20 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
This.Tiggnutz wrote:Harvey is a sick fuck and sounds like a good candidate for chemical castration.
- Reign in Blood
- Administrator
- Posts: 9456
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Did you build a special phone app for this purpose, or do you keep a little tiny notepad in your pocket?Jmac Attack wrote:Uhhhh.....the obsession is the opposite. Look in the mirror. You can't say anything bad about him. At all. It's funny, because I am keeping track of all the good things I say about Trump. It's been 4 times in three weeks. I have heard crickets. I can't wait for you to tell my that I just hate him to hate him. Lulz. Carry on.......Foo wrote:I guess that tends to happen when the guy is pulled into a conversation that has nothing to do with him because of zombie's obsession with tearing him down.showa58taro wrote:There’s always an excuse for trump isn’t there.Foo wrote:Don't see that the guy was convicted or a known child molester when Trump (or the Clintons) associated with him. Seemed like that came out later and he has been out of that loop since.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Conservatives said nothing about Roger Ailes. They should have some self respect and admit they don't actually care about the allegations, just that they can tie it to "the enemy".
Partisan hackery everywhere.
Partisan hackery everywhere.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
But I'll give the OP a fair shake and break it down. Making a big deal about this because it's tied to liberals/Democrats means one of two things:
1. You hold Democrats to a higher moral standard and believe the behavior would be acceptable from Republicans.
2. You're being a partisan hack who insults victims by dragging their stories through the mud for political brownie points.
1. You hold Democrats to a higher moral standard and believe the behavior would be acceptable from Republicans.
2. You're being a partisan hack who insults victims by dragging their stories through the mud for political brownie points.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
There are no victims in this as far as I have seen. There is no rape, there is one group of opportunists versus the other.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
It is like a "feminist" battle royal. Keep hoping Joss Whedon will chime in.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
I thought this section was always an embarrassment!Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.Foo wrote:I thought this section was always an embarrassment!Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
This section is just a click-bait Breitbart knock off at this point.
Last edited by Headhunter on Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
maybe it would be more interesting if i left it alone?Headhunter wrote:Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.Foo wrote:I thought this section was always an embarrassment!Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
I do think it's curious that you engage every time, but you're a good dude that way. You know what the deal is every time, nothing's going to change.zombie wrote:maybe it would be more interesting if i left it alone?Headhunter wrote:Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.Foo wrote:I thought this section was always an embarrassment!Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
it just feels like it needs to be challenged. that's my shortcoming, i guess.Headhunter wrote:I do think it's curious that you engage every time, but you're a good dude that way. You know what the deal is every time, nothing's going to change.zombie wrote:maybe it would be more interesting if i left it alone?Headhunter wrote:Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.Foo wrote:I thought this section was always an embarrassment!Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
I have taken this section under my wing and tried to generate discussion. Of course if I am making most of the threads it is going to tilt to my personality.Headhunter wrote:Why would you think that? There were once good discussions from both sides in this forum. Now it's just an endless stream of "Fuck liberals" threads with the same formula. Outrageous partisan hackery in the OP with Zombie inevitably unraveling the partisan angle, dragging out 2-3 pages with nothing resembling a real discussion. How fun.Foo wrote:I thought this section was always an embarrassment!Headhunter wrote:However you want to define it is cool with me, but it's telling that you wanted to pick apart that detail. Admission that this thread is nothing but partisan hackery. This section has become an embarrassment.
And yeah, I have no shame. Fuck all the phony feminists. Harassment, cheating, opportunistic, slutty, etc. Like I said, there are no victims.
- Headhunter
- Charter Member
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Untangling Harvey Weinstein
Foo, I do really respect that you're at least honest about the partisan nature of this stuff. We both know there are too many conservatives who constantly do the run-around bullshit to not offend 75% of the country. The semantics and the games with this stuff are annoying.
Not removing until John Elway is fired.